A comparison of the timing of muscle activity during sitting down compared to standing up.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE This study was designed to investigate the temporal pattern of the activation and de-activation of muscles during sitting down to a seated position. The aim was to determine if reproducible patterns existed in the timing of muscle activation and deactivation, in normal subjects, and to compare that produced for sitting down with the pattern produced for standing up. METHOD The 10 subjects used for the experiment were a convenience sample consisting of healthy male volunteers aged 19-32 years. The design was that of a descriptive study. Subjects were instructed to stand up and sit back down to a seated position. During this activity kinematic (movement) and electromyographic (EMG) data were collected. A pattern of timing for the activity of different muscles or groups was produced and this was compared with the movement occurring. RESULTS The study found a consistent pattern of EMG activity during sitting down from a standing position. This pattern was documented and the pattern was compared with that produced during standing up. CONCLUSIONS The results demonstrated that a consistent pattern of muscle activation and de-activation was produced in this group of subjects during sitting down. The pattern of muscle activation and de-activation for sitting down was documented. When comparing the pattern produced during sitting down with that produced during standing up it is apparent that some of the muscles were active during both movement patterns at the same relative point in the pattern.

[1]  H Iwakura,et al.  Motion analysis in the movements of standing up from and sitting down on a chair. A comparison of normal and hemiparetic subjects and the differences of sex and age among the normals. , 1983, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[2]  M. Borrie,et al.  Circumstances and consequences of falls experienced by a community population 70 years and over during a prospective study. , 1990, Age and ageing.

[3]  M. Munih,et al.  Analysis of standing up and sitting down in humans: definitions and normative data presentation. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  R W Bohannon,et al.  Sit-to-Stand Test for Measuring Performance of Lower Extremity Muscles , 1995, Perceptual and motor skills.

[5]  S. Rose,et al.  Muscle mutability. Part 1. General concepts and adaptations to altered patterns of use. , 1982, Physical Therapy.

[6]  G. M. Shambes,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of the sit-to-stand motion in elderly persons. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  D. V. Vander Linden,et al.  Variant and invariant characteristics of the sit-to-stand task in healthy elderly adults. , 1994, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

[8]  Robertw . Mann,et al.  Whole-body movements during rising to standing from sitting. , 1990, Physical therapy.

[9]  J. Basmajian Muscles Alive—their functions revealed by electromyography , 1963 .

[10]  P. Riley,et al.  Reliability of a clinical kinematic assessment of the sit-to-stand movement. , 1990, Physical therapy.

[11]  Michael W. Whittle,et al.  Gait Analysis: An Introduction , 1986 .

[12]  R. D'ambrosia,et al.  Muscular coactivation , 1988, The American journal of sports medicine.

[13]  A. Schultz,et al.  Rising from a chair: effects of age and functional ability on performance biomechanics. , 1991, Journal of gerontology.

[14]  M W Rogers,et al.  Reliability of measurements of body center-of-mass momentum during sit-to-stand in healthy adults. , 1995, Physical therapy.