Analytical Prediction of Pipeline Behaviors in J-Lay on Plastic Seabed

J-lay is widely accepted as a favorable method for deepwater pipeline installation. The configuration and internal force of the pipeline during the laying process are key factors for its safety, and the embedment induced during pipeline installation plays an important role for pipeline stability in service. Traditionally, the seabed in the analysis of J-lay is assumed to be elastic, whereas deepwater deposits are usually very soft, exhibiting low strength and obvious plasticity. This paper presents an analytical model for pipelaying on plastic seabed. This model simplifies the pipeline as the combination of four segments: a natural catenary in water, a boundary-layer segment, a beam on the seabed (touchdown zone) where the soil deforms plastically, and a freely laid horizontal segment. The comparison with a traditional elastic-seabed model reveals that both models have similar pipeline configurations, although the elastic-seabed model slightly underestimates the maximum bending moment. In contrast, the pipeline embedment depths in the two models differ with deeper ultimate penetration predicted in the plastic-seabed model.

[1]  Minoo H. Patel,et al.  Mathematics of flexible risers including pressure and internal flow effects , 1992 .

[2]  D. R. Rutledge,et al.  Stiffened Catenary Calculations in Pipeline Laying Problem , 1968 .

[3]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Upper-bound yield envelopes for pipelines at shallow embedment in clay , 2008 .

[4]  E. Clukey,et al.  Steel Catenary Riser Touchdown Point Vertical Interaction Models , 2004 .

[5]  Charles Aubeny,et al.  Collapse Loads for a Cylinder Embedded in Trench in Cohesive Soil , 2005 .

[6]  Massimo Callegari,et al.  Simple analytical models for the J-lay problem , 2005 .

[7]  Charles Aubeny,et al.  Seafloor Interaction With Steel Catenary Risers , 2008 .

[8]  Svein Sævik,et al.  Advances in Design and Installation Analysis of Pipelines in Congested Areas With Rough Seabed Topography , 2004 .

[9]  David White,et al.  UPPER BOUND PLASTICITY ANALYSIS OF A PARTIALLY-EMBEDDED PIPE UNDER COMBINED VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL LOADING , 2008 .

[10]  D. N. McDonald,et al.  The Next Generation J-Lay System , 1998 .

[11]  R. Plunkett.  Static Bending Stresses in Catenaries and Drill Strings , 1967 .

[12]  Vincenzo Mallardo,et al.  A refined analytical analysis of submerged pipelines in seabed laying , 1999 .

[13]  P. Brando,et al.  Determination of Sealines Elastic Curves and Stresses to be Expected During Laying Operations , 1971 .

[14]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Non-Linear Hysteretic Seabed Model for Catenary Pipeline Contact , 2009 .

[15]  Jga Croll,et al.  Bending boundary layers in tensioned cables and rods , 2000 .

[16]  Mark Randolph,et al.  The ultimate undrained resistance of partially embedded pipelines , 2008 .

[17]  Hoda A. ElMaraghy,et al.  Advances in Design , 2006 .

[18]  Andrew Palmer,et al.  Configuration of Submarine Pipelines During Laying Operations , 1974 .

[19]  Mark Cassidy,et al.  A plasticity model for predicting the vertical and lateral behaviour of pipelines in clay soils , 2010 .

[20]  M. Randolph,et al.  T-Bar penetration testing in soft clay , 1994 .

[21]  J. D. Murff,et al.  PIPE PENETRATION IN COHESIVE SOIL , 1989 .

[22]  Andrew Palmer,et al.  Touchdown indentation of the seabed , 2008 .

[23]  K. S. Varyani,et al.  An absolute coordinate formulation for three-dimensional flexible pipe analysis , 2006 .