Conspicuity of microcalcifications on digital screening mammograms using varying degrees of monitor zooming.

[1]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[2]  P. Bourgouin,et al.  Chest "gestalt" and detectability of lung lesions. , 1993, European journal of radiology.

[3]  E. Grabbe,et al.  Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications , 2002, European Radiology.

[4]  Claudia Mello-Thoms,et al.  Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  Mary Scott Soo,et al.  Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display. , 2002, Radiology.

[6]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  Per Skaane,et al.  Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--Oslo I study. , 2003, Radiology.

[8]  Etta D Pisano,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer Senoscan Digital Mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[9]  Per Skaane,et al.  Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program--the Oslo II Study. , 2004, Radiology.

[10]  Jung-Han Kim,et al.  Screen-Film Mammography and Soft-Copy Full-Field Digital Mammography: Comparison in the Patients with Microcalcifications , 2005, Korean journal of radiology.

[11]  Elizabeth A. Krupinski,et al.  Differential Use of Image Enhancement Techniques by Experienced and Inexperienced Observers , 2005, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[12]  Jules Sumkin,et al.  Effects of lesion conspicuity on visual search in mammogram reading. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[13]  Kathy M Willison,et al.  Full-field digital mammography on LCD versus CRT monitors. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  Yuanshui Zheng,et al.  Comparison of calcification specificity in digital mammography using soft-copy display versus screen-film mammography. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  R. Hendrick,et al.  Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  P. Taylor,et al.  A review of research into the development of radiologic expertise: implications for computer-based training. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[17]  P. Skaane,et al.  Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. , 2007, Radiology.

[18]  Stefano Ciatto,et al.  Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  Dev P Chakraborty,et al.  Validation and statistical power comparison of methods for analyzing free-response observer performance studies. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[20]  Jean B. Cormack,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. , 2008, Radiology.

[21]  Claudia Mello-Thoms,et al.  Using gaze-tracking data and mixture distribution analysis to support a holistic model for the detection of cancers on mammograms. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[22]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  The effect of breast compression on mass conspicuity in digital mammography. , 2008, Medical physics.

[23]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Experimental design and data analysis in receiver operating characteristic studies: lessons learned from reports in radiology from 1997 to 2006. , 2009, Radiology.

[24]  T. Stephens,et al.  Timed efficiency of interpretation of digital and film-screen screening mammograms. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  Jihong Wang,et al.  Why Does It Take Longer to Read Digital Than Film-Screen Screening Mammograms? A Partial Explanation , 2010, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[26]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. , 2009, Radiology.

[27]  Mercè Comas,et al.  Implementation of digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program: effect of screening round on recall rate and cancer detection. , 2009, Radiology.

[28]  S. V. Destounis.  Accuracy of Soft-Copy Digital Mammography versus That of Screen-Film Mammography according to Digital Manufacturer: ACRIN DMIST Retrospective Multireader Study , 2009 .

[29]  Sarah Vinnicombe,et al.  Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data. , 2009, Radiology.

[30]  Anabel M Scaranelo,et al.  Sensitivity of a Direct Computer-aided Detection System in Full-field Digital Mammography for Detection of Microcalcifications Not Associated with Mass or Architectural Distortion , 2010, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.