The minimal cadherin-catenin complex binds to actin filaments under force

INTRODUCTION Cadherins are an ancient class of transmembrane proteins that are essential for the formation of multicellular tissues in metazoans. Cadherins link intercellular adhesions to the cellular cytoskeleton, but how they are connected specifically to actin filaments is a hotly debated issue. Genetic and cell culture experiments indicate that E-cadherin, β-catenin, and the actin filament binding protein αE-catenin form a minimal cadherin-catenin complex that binds to the actin cytoskeleton directly in epithelial tissues. However, experiments with purified proteins showed that a stable cadherin-catenin complex can be reconstituted, but it does not bind strongly to actin filaments in solution. Nevertheless, cell culture experiments indicated that the cadherin-catenin complex is under constitutive actomyosin-generated tension and that this connection is required for mechanotransduction at cadherin-based adhesions. Here, we tested the hypothesis that tension is required to stabilize a linkage between the cadherin-catenin complex and actin filaments, and clarify how the cadherin-catenin complex could interact directly with the actin cytoskeleton in cells. Two-state catch bond model of cadherin-catenin/F-actin interactions. Force stabilizes the cadherin-catenin/F-actin bond by shifting it from a weakly to a strongly bound state. The force dependence of the connection between the cadherin-catenin complex and actin f laments may explain the mechanosensitivity of cadherin-mediated intercellular adhesions. RATIONALE We developed an optical trap–based assay to measure the lifetime of cadherin-catenin complex/actin filament bonds under tension. An actin filament was attached to two optically trapped beads and suspended above purified cadherin-catenin complexes immobilized on a glass coverslip surface that was precoated with glass microspheres. The coverslip was mounted on a motorized stage. This spatial arrangement was informed by electron tomography of cell-cell junctions, which showed actin filaments parallel to the plasma membrane. Tension was applied to cadherin-catenin complex/actin bonds by moving the sample stage back and forth parallel to the actin filament; if the immobilized cadherin-catenin complexes bound the actin filament, the attached beads were displaced from the optical trap. The lifetime of the bond was measured from the time series of the force exerted on the trapped beads. Kinetic models were fit to bond lifetime distributions with respect to applied force. RESULTS We observed robust, reproducible cadherin-catenin complex/actin filament binding under force in optical trap–based experiments. Bond lifetime distributions had a biphasic dependence on force. The mean lifetimes increased from ~60 ms at low force to ~1.2 s at ~10 pN, after which they decreased. A two-state catch bond model is consistent with the biphasic mean lifetime distribution and the presence of two distinct lifetime subpopulations. In this model, bonds between a cadherin-catenin complex and an actin filament form in a weakly bound state and quickly dissociate, but rapidly transition to a strongly bound state as applied force increases. Long lifetimes are achieved in this state until higher forces accelerate dissociation from the strongly bound state (see the figure). CONCLUSION Our data and kinetic model reconcile previous in vitro and in vivo work by demonstrating that the cadherin-catenin complex binds robustly to actin filaments under force. Thus, it seems that direct cadherin-catenin complex/actin filament binding was not detected in previous solution-based assays because bonds were not strengthened by tension. The two bound states in our model may correspond to different conformational states of αE-catenin, consistent with previous observations that αE-catenin may undergo changes in conformation in response to actomyosin-generated cytoskeletal tension. Our model of cadherin-catenin complex/ actin filament bond dissociation, combined with previous evidence of cooperative binding of αE-catenin to actin filaments, indicates that the linkage is self-reinforcing and that its stability is dynamically regulated by mechanical force during tissue development and maintenance. Pulling me apart only makes me stronger Tension transmitted between neighboring cells can exert profound effects on cell proliferation, differentiation, and tissue organization. Exactly how intercellular mechanical tension is sensed at the molecular level is unknown. One attractive hypothesis is that a linkage between the cell-cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin, its binding partners α- and β-catenin, and actin filaments may act as a tension sensor. However, how this linkage is established at the molecular level is not known. Buckley et al. used optical tweezers to determine how mechanical load influences interactions of the cadherin/catenin complex with single actin filaments. The data support a model in which force shifts the interaction from a force-independent, weakly bound state to a highly force-sensitive, strongly bound state. The findings may explain how cells maintain tissue integrity while still being able to move and change shape. Science, this issue p. 10.1126/science.1254211 A protein complex involved in cell adhesion forms a two-state catch bond with the cytoskeleton under mechanical load. Linkage between the adherens junction (AJ) and the actin cytoskeleton is required for tissue development and homeostasis. In vivo findings indicated that the AJ proteins E-cadherin, β-catenin, and the filamentous (F)–actin binding protein αE-catenin form a minimal cadherin-catenin complex that binds directly to F-actin. Biochemical studies challenged this model because the purified cadherin-catenin complex does not bind F-actin in solution. Here, we reconciled this difference. Using an optical trap–based assay, we showed that the minimal cadherin-catenin complex formed stable bonds with an actin filament under force. Bond dissociation kinetics can be explained by a catch-bond model in which force shifts the bond from a weakly to a strongly bound state. These results may explain how the cadherin-catenin complex transduces mechanical forces at cell-cell junctions.

[1]  J R Kremer,et al.  Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[2]  Timothy A. Springer,et al.  Structural basis for selectin mechanochemistry , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Hui Li,et al.  Resolving the molecular mechanism of cadherin catch bond formation , 2014, Nature Communications.

[4]  Beth L. Pruitt,et al.  E-cadherin is under constitutive actomyosin-generated tension that is increased at cell–cell contacts upon externally applied stretch , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  D. Leckband,et al.  Tissue organization by cadherin adhesion molecules: dynamic molecular and cellular mechanisms of morphogenetic regulation. , 2011, Physiological reviews.

[6]  W. Weis,et al.  Biochemical and Structural Definition of the l-Afadin- and Actin-binding Sites of α-Catenin* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  Colin Echeverría Aitken,et al.  An oxygen scavenging system for improvement of dye stability in single-molecule fluorescence experiments. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[8]  William H Guilford,et al.  Mechanics of actomyosin bonds in different nucleotide states are tuned to muscle contraction. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  M. Takeichi,et al.  Adherens junction: molecular architecture and regulation. , 2009, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[10]  M. Takeichi,et al.  EPLIN mediates linkage of the cadherin–catenin complex to F-actin and stabilizes the circumferential actin belt , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  R. Liddington,et al.  αE-catenin is an autoinhibited molecule that coactivates vinculin , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  E. Evans Probing the relation between force--lifetime--and chemistry in single molecular bonds. , 2001, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[13]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Quantifying the Effects of Molecular Orientation and Length on Two-dimensional Receptor-Ligand Binding Kinetics* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  Amy M. Clobes,et al.  Loop 2 of myosin is a force-dependent inhibitor of the rigor bond , 2014, Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility.

[15]  E. Rangarajan,et al.  The Cytoskeletal Protein α-Catenin Unfurls upon Binding to Vinculin* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  B. Jockusch,et al.  Vinculin Is Part of the Cadherin–Catenin Junctional Complex: Complex Formation between α-Catenin and Vinculin , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[17]  D L Rimm,et al.  Alpha 1(E)-catenin is an actin-binding and -bundling protein mediating the attachment of F-actin to the membrane adhesion complex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  B. Gumbiner,et al.  Regulation of cadherin-mediated adhesion in morphogenesis , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[19]  Dynamic response of adhesion complexes: beyond the single-path picture. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  Guillermo A. Gomez,et al.  α-Catenin cytomechanics – role in cadherin-dependent adhesion and mechanotransduction , 2014, Development.

[21]  Simon C Watkins,et al.  αE-catenin actin-binding domain alters actin filament conformation and regulates binding of nucleation and disassembly factors , 2013, Molecular biology of the cell.

[22]  W. Nelson,et al.  Localized zones of Rho and Rac activities drive initiation and expansion of epithelial cell–cell adhesion , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[23]  V Barsegov,et al.  Dynamics of unbinding of cell adhesion molecules: transition from catch to slip bonds. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Kirstine Berg-Sørensen,et al.  tweezercalib 2.1: Faster version of MatLab package for precise calibration of optical tweezers , 2006, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[25]  William I. Weis,et al.  Structure of the Dimerization and β-Catenin- Binding Region of α-Catenin , 2000 .

[26]  J. D. Pardee,et al.  [18] Purification of muscle actin , 1982 .

[27]  Lina M. Nilsson,et al.  Catch-bond model derived from allostery explains force-activated bacterial adhesion. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[28]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Direct observation of catch bonds involving cell-adhesion molecules , 2003, Nature.

[29]  K. Tachibana,et al.  Two Cell Adhesion Molecules, Nectin and Cadherin, Interact through Their Cytoplasmic Domain–Associated Proteins , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  Jizhong Lou,et al.  Force history dependence of receptor-ligand dissociation. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[31]  E. Spanjaard,et al.  Vinculin associates with endothelial VE-cadherin junctions to control force-dependent remodeling , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[32]  D. Rimm,et al.  Vinculin Is Associated with the E-cadherin Adhesion Complex* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Cofilin activity downstream of Pak1 regulates cell protrusion efficiency by organizing lamellipodium and lamella actin networks. , 2007, Developmental cell.

[34]  M. Mareel,et al.  αT-Catenin: a novel tissue-specific β-catenin-binding protein mediating strong cell-cell adhesion , 2001 .

[35]  Scott D. Hansen,et al.  Structural and Thermodynamic Characterization of Cadherin·β-Catenin·α-Catenin Complex Formation* , 2014, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[36]  Viola Vogel,et al.  Biophysics of catch bonds. , 2008, Annual review of biophysics.

[37]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[38]  D. Barford,et al.  Crystal structure of the M‐fragment of α‐catenin: implications for modulation of cell adhesion , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[39]  Guillermo A. Gomez,et al.  &agr;-Catenin cytomechanics – role in cadherin-dependent adhesion and mechanotransduction , 2014, Journal of Cell Science.

[40]  G. I. Bell Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. , 1978, Science.

[41]  Ning Wang,et al.  Vinculin potentiates E-cadherin mechanosensing and is recruited to actin-anchored sites within adherens junctions in a myosin II–dependent manner , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[42]  N. Volkmann,et al.  Correlative light-electron microscopy. , 2011, Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology.

[43]  D. Laurents,et al.  The cadherin cytoplasmic domain is unstructured in the absence of beta-catenin. A possible mechanism for regulating cadherin turnover. , 2001, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[44]  S. Yonemura,et al.  α-Catenin as a tension transducer that induces adherens junction development , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[45]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Low Force Decelerates L-selectin Dissociation from P-selectin Glycoprotein Ligand-1 and Endoglycan* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[46]  Jizhong Lou,et al.  A structure-based sliding-rebinding mechanism for catch bonds. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[47]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Mechanical switching and coupling between two dissociation pathways in a P-selectin adhesion bond. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  M. Takeichi Dynamic contacts: rearranging adherens junctions to drive epithelial remodelling , 2014, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[49]  N. Volkmann,et al.  Toxofilin upregulates the host cortical actin cytoskeleton dynamics, facilitating Toxoplasma invasion , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[50]  E. Rangarajan,et al.  Dimer asymmetry defines α-catenin interactions , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[51]  Oleg V Prezhdo,et al.  The two-pathway model for the catch-slip transition in biological adhesion. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[52]  Michael Hinczewski,et al.  Plasticity of hydrogen bond networks regulates mechanochemistry of cell adhesion complexes , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  S. Rakshit,et al.  Ideal, catch, and slip bonds in cadherin adhesion , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Mechanical Feedback through E-Cadherin Promotes Direction Sensing during Collective Cell Migration , 2014, Cell.

[55]  William I. Weis,et al.  α-Catenin Is a Molecular Switch that Binds E-Cadherin-β-Catenin and Regulates Actin-Filament Assembly , 2005, Cell.

[56]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  JCB_200810002 1275..1284 , 2009 .

[57]  L. Leinwand,et al.  Molecular consequences of the R453C hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutation on human β-cardiac myosin motor function , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  N. Volkmann,et al.  Quantitative fitting of atomic models into observed densities derived by electron microscopy. , 1999, Journal of structural biology.

[59]  Jie Yan,et al.  Force-dependent conformational switch of α-catenin controls vinculin binding , 2014, Nature Communications.

[60]  Max A. Little,et al.  Generalized methods and solvers for noise removal from piecewise constant signals. I. Background theory , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[61]  William I. Weis,et al.  Deconstructing the Cadherin-Catenin-Actin Complex , 2005, Cell.

[62]  David N Mastronarde,et al.  Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. , 2005, Journal of structural biology.

[63]  Sivaraj Sivaramakrishnan,et al.  Single-molecule dual-beam optical trap analysis of protein structure and function. , 2010, Methods in enzymology.

[64]  Ning Wang,et al.  Vinculin-dependent Cadherin mechanosensing regulates efficient epithelial barrier formation , 2012, Biology Open.

[65]  Kentaro Abe,et al.  An Autoinhibited Structure of α-Catenin and Its Implications for Vinculin Recruitment to Adherens Junctions* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[66]  S. Almo,et al.  Danio rerio αE-catenin Is a Monomeric F-actin Binding Protein with Distinct Properties from Mus musculus αE-catenin* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[67]  A. P. Soler,et al.  Interaction of alpha-actinin with the cadherin/catenin cell-cell adhesion complex via alpha-catenin , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[68]  J. Peacock Two-dimensional goodness-of-fit testing in astronomy , 1983 .

[69]  H. Kramers Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions , 1940 .

[70]  H. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Power spectrum analysis for optical tweezers , 2004 .

[71]  Valeri Vasioukhin,et al.  Adherens junctions and cancer. , 2012, Sub-cellular biochemistry.

[72]  W. Weis,et al.  Alpha-catenin is a molecular switch that binds E-cadherin-beta-catenin and regulates actin-filament assembly. , 2005, Cell.