Uncovering relationships between view direction patterns and glare perception in a daylit workspace

This paper presents the results of an experimental study that aims to provide objective insights as to how luminance distribution in an office setting modulates our view direction (VD) in a daylit workspace while performing office tasks. Using the office-like test facility at Fraunhofer ISE (Freiburg, Germany) to create a range of controlled daylighting conditions, and a wearable mobile eye-tracker to measure eye and head orientation, we assessed VD distributions for subjects performing a standardized sequence of typical office tasks relative to two different daylight conditions: low contrast condition with no direct sunlight as compared to high contrast condition with direct sunlight coming into the room. Our results show that while the participants look more outside the window during a non-cognitive and non-visual office task, this effect is lower under the high contrast lighting conditions. Moreover, the focus of the VDs is on the task area when the participants are performing a task involving visual and cognitive activities.

[1]  Werner Osterhaus,et al.  Discomfort glare assessment and prevention for daylight applications in office environments , 2005 .

[2]  Christoph F. Reinhart,et al.  The ‘adaptive zone’ – A concept for assessing discomfort glare throughout daylit spaces , 2012 .

[3]  Marilyne Andersen,et al.  Investigation of gaze patterns in daylit workplaces: using eye-tracking methods to objectify view direction as a function of lighting conditions , 2013 .

[4]  Steve Fotios,et al.  Human Factors in Lighting, 3rd ed. , 2015 .

[5]  S. K. Guth,et al.  Brightnesses in visual field at borderline between comfort and discomfort. , 1949, Illuminating engineering.

[6]  Michael Sivak,et al.  Discomfort glare is task dependent , 1991 .

[7]  Vítor Leal,et al.  Influence of shading control patterns on the energy assessment of office spaces , 2012 .

[8]  P. R. Tregenza,et al.  View and discomfort glare from windows , 2007 .

[9]  Marc Fontoynont,et al.  Proceedings of CIE Centenary Conference "Towards a New Century of Light" , 2013 .

[10]  Stefan Kohlbecher,et al.  BASIC AND CLINICAL ASPECTS OF VERTIGO AND DIZZINESS EyeSeeCam: An Eye Movement–Driven Head Camera for the Examination of Natural Visual Exploration , 2009 .

[11]  J. Veitch Psychological Processes Influencing Lighting Quality , 2001 .

[12]  Ann R. Webb,et al.  Considerations for lighting in the built environment: Non-visual effects of light , 2006 .

[13]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of Reading in Normal and Low Vision , 2006 .

[14]  Ahmet Çakir,et al.  Human Factors in Lighting , 2014, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[15]  Jan Wienold,et al.  Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras , 2006 .

[16]  Robert Clear,et al.  Discomfort glare: What do we actually know? , 2013 .

[17]  Marilyne Andersen,et al.  Integration of Eye-tracking Methods in Visual Comfort Assessments , 2011 .

[18]  Hyunjoo Han,et al.  The position index of a glare source at the borderline between comfort and discomfort (BCD) in the whole visual field , 2009 .

[19]  Jennifer A. Veitch,et al.  Task Lighting Effects on Office Worker Satisfaction and Performance, and Energy Efficiency , 2005 .

[20]  J. J. Vos Reflections on glare , 2003 .

[21]  P. T. Stone,et al.  A model for the explanation of discomfort and pain in the eye caused by light , 2009 .