Challenges of and criteria for validating a physiology model within a TCCC serious game

Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) principles save lives on the battlefield but tend to stress established military medical training structures because of the need to train the entire force, thereby encouraging new large-scale computer-based training methods such as serious games. Since improper training would cause avoidable casualty deaths, important experimental efforts have been made to ensure the validity and reliability of these new methods and of their components. This survey of validation efforts attempts to identify best practice, challenges and limitations for proper design and rigorous validation of TCCC serious games and their virtual casualty pathophysiological simulation components, guided by the hippocratical requirement that new TCCC training methods must be more effective and reliable than traditional ones, in order for their large-scale use to be ethically acceptable (first, do no harm). TCCC serious game validation solutions are then deduced to guide our own TCCC serious game demonstrator design.

[1]  T G Coleman,et al.  HUMAN. A comprehensive physiological model. , 1983, The Physiologist.

[2]  F. Al-Shamali,et al.  Author Biographies. , 2015, Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation.

[3]  Jiri Kofranek,et al.  The Atlas of Physiology and Pathophysiology: Web-based multimedia enabled interactive simulations , 2011, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[4]  I. A. Chaikovsky,et al.  Terminology for model credibility , 1979 .

[5]  T. G. Coleman,et al.  Systems biology and integrative physiological modelling , 2011, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  T. G. Coleman,et al.  Circulation: overall regulation. , 1972, Annual review of physiology.

[7]  Michael D. Proctor,et al.  Assessing Combat Medic Knowledge and Transfer Effects Resulting from Alternative Training Treatments , 2009 .

[8]  T. G. Coleman,et al.  Validation of a computational platform for the analysis of the physiologic mechanisms of a human experimental model of hemorrhage. , 2009, Resuscitation.

[9]  T. G. Coleman,et al.  Quantitative Circulatory Physiology: An integrative mathematical model of human physiology for medical education , 2007, Advances in physiology education.

[10]  Gunnar Abrahamson,et al.  Terminology for model credibility , 1980 .

[11]  Robert L. Hester,et al.  HumMod: A Modeling Environment for the Simulation of Integrative Human Physiology , 2011, Front. Physio..

[12]  M. Schijven,et al.  Systematic review of serious games for medical education and surgical skills training , 2012, The British journal of surgery.

[13]  J. Dankelman,et al.  Validation of a new basic virtual reality simulator for training of basic endoscopic skills , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[14]  J. López-Novoa,et al.  Teaching integrative physiology using the quantitative circulatory physiology model and case discussion method: evaluation of the learning experience. , 2008, Advances in physiology education.

[15]  Marko A. Hofmann,et al.  Tactical combat casualty care: Strategic issues of a serious simulation game development , 2012, Proceedings Title: Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[16]  R. M. Satava,et al.  Fundamental principles of validation, and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[17]  Frank E. Ritter,et al.  Towards Adding a Physiological Substrate to ACT-R , 2012 .

[18]  Emily Burns,et al.  U.S. Army Research, Development, And Engineering Command (RDECOM), Independent Test And Evaluation Of The Stand Alone Patient Simulator (SAPS), Under The DoD Challenge Program , 2009 .

[19]  John B Holcomb,et al.  Tactical combat casualty care 2007: evolving concepts and battlefield experience. , 2007, Military medicine.