Motivation for Achievement and Attitudes toward Mathematics Instruction in a Required Calculus Course at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology

This study from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) examines students’ learning goals and attitudes toward mathematics in a first-year calculus course in undergraduate engineering education. Achievement motivation research using the Achievement Goal Questionnaire (AGQ) is advanced from current literature with two additions: (1) a course specific context using introductory college calculus students, and (2) participation of Norwegian students. Preand posttest measures of attitudes indicate that students do change learning goals over time, unfortunately opposite to the instructors’ aspirations. A significant increase in “Mastery Avoidance” and “Work Avoidance” was accompanied with a drop in “Mastery Approach” and “Performance Approach”. Variables such as value, motivation and enjoyment decreased along with a significant drop in self-confidence.

[1]  A. Elliot,et al.  A 2 X 2 achievement goal framework. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  K. E. Barron,et al.  Predictors and Consequences of Achievement Goals in the College Classroom: Maintaining Interest and Making the Grade , 1997 .

[3]  Andrew J. Elliot,et al.  Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. , 2000 .

[4]  George E. Marsh,et al.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Attitudes toward Mathematics Inventory. , 2002 .

[5]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  The Relationship between Motivational Beliefs and Learning Strategy Use among Norwegian College Students , 1998, Contemporary educational psychology.

[6]  An investigation of Physics undergraduates’ attitudes towards mathematics , 2010 .

[7]  M. Tapia,et al.  The Attitudes toward Mathematics Instrument. , 1996 .

[8]  C. Berg.  Factors related to observed attitude change toward learning chemistry among university students , 2005 .

[9]  J. Tyssedal,et al.  Approaches to Study and the Quality of Learning. Some Empirical Evidence from Engineering Education , 2005 .

[10]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulated learning and academic achievement : theoretical perspectives , 2001 .

[11]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Understanding Student Learning , 1983 .

[12]  Richard L. Scheaffer.  Scientifically Based Research in Quantitative Literacy: Guidelines for Building a Knowledge Base , 2008 .

[13]  W. S. Gardner,et al.  A Framework for Assessing General Education Outcomes Within the Majors , 2004 .

[14]  A. A. Lumsdaine.  Communication and persuasion , 1954 .

[15]  K. E. Barron,et al.  Examining the Psychometric Properties of the Achievement Goal Questionnaire in a General Academic Context , 2004 .

[16]  Pieter Reitsma,et al.  Educational and Psychological Measurement , 2003 .

[17]  Dorothy Wallace,et al.  Calculus, Biology and Medicine: A Case Study in Quantitative Literacy for Science Students , 2011 .

[18]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[19]  Inessa Levi,et al.  An Assessment of General Education Mathematics Courses via Examination of Student Expectations and Performance , 2004 .

[20]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Beyond Cold Conceptual Change: The Role of Motivational Beliefs and Classroom Contextual Factors in the Process of Conceptual Change , 1993 .

[21]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[22]  Robert J. Marzano,et al.  Designing a New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[23]  Mark W. Anderson,et al.  Attitude Changes of Undergraduate University Students in General Education Courses , 2007, The Journal of General Education.