Heat and Mass Transfer between Indoor Air and a Permeable and Hygroscopic Building Envelope: Part I – Field Measurements

In this paper, measurements are presented which quantify the mass transfer of tracer gases and water vapor between indoor air and a permeable and hygroscopic building envelope. The transfer of tracer gases through the envelope requires the entire envelope to be permeable, while the transfer of moisture requires sufficient hygroscopic mass to be in contact with the indoor air. The results show that mass transfer can improve the indoor air quality and climate. The diffusion of gases through the building envelope significantly increases the effective ventilation rate for poorly ventilated rooms, but only moderately increases the effective ventilation for well-ventilated rooms. Moisture transfer, on the other hand, has a significant influence on the indoor humidity for both poorly and well-ventilated rooms.

[1]  C. A. Johnson,et al.  Energy consumption and economic evaluation of thermal storage and recovery systems for a large commercial building , 1988 .

[2]  Nicole Normandin,et al.  Hygrothermal Properties of Several Building Materials , 2002 .

[3]  Povl Ole Fanger,et al.  Air humidity requirements for human comfort , 1999 .

[4]  M Orme,et al.  Energy and ventilation , 1998 .

[5]  P. Fanger,et al.  Impact of Temperature and Humidity on the Perception of Indoor Air Quality , 1998 .

[6]  James E. Braun,et al.  Reducing energy costs and peak electrical demand through optimal control of building thermal storage , 1990 .

[7]  Carey J. Simonson,et al.  Air-to-air exchangers , 2003 .

[8]  P. Fanger,et al.  Upper limits of air humidity for preventing warm respiratory discomfort , 1998 .

[9]  Carey J. Simonson,et al.  Heat and Mass Transfer between Indoor Air and a Permeable and Hygroscopic Building Envelope: Part II – Verification and Numerical Studies , 2004 .

[10]  T Padfield.  The role of absorbent materials in moderating changes of relative humidity , 1998 .

[11]  J. E. Janssen,et al.  Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality , 1989 .

[12]  Michael J. Witte,et al.  Evaluating active desiccant systems for ventilating commercial buildings , 1999 .

[13]  D. B. Shirey,et al.  Cost-effective HVAC technologies to meet ASHRAE Standard 62-1989 in hot and humid climates , 1996 .

[14]  P. Fanger,et al.  Impact of Temperature and Humidity on Perception of Indoor Air Quality During Immediate and Longer Whole‐Body Exposures , 1998 .

[15]  Tim Padfield.  The role of absorbent building materials in moderating changes of relative humidity: Ph.D.thesis , 1999 .

[16]  Kai Sirén,et al.  The effects on indoor comfort when using phase change materials with building concrete products , 2000 .

[17]  Carey J. Simonson,et al.  Moisture Performance of an Airtight, Vapor-permeable Building Envelope in a Cold Climate , 2005 .

[18]  H.L.C. Jensen,et al.  Proceedings of Healthy Buildings 2000 , 2000 .

[19]  J. Sundell,et al.  What we know, and don`t know about sick building syndrome , 1996 .

[20]  Hr Trechsel,et al.  Moisture control in buildings , 1994 .

[21]  C. Rode,et al.  Integrated hygrothermal analysis of ecological buildings , 2003 .

[22]  Standard Ashrae.  Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy , 1992 .

[23]  Jeffrey E. Christian,et al.  The performance check between whole building thermal performance criteria and exterior wall measured clear wall R-value, thermal bridging, thermal mass, and airtightness , 1998 .