Special aspects of cosmetic spray safety evaluations: principles on inhalation risk assessment.

The consumer exposure to the vast majority of cosmetic products is limited to dermal contact. Even spray applications tend to be topically exposed to skin or hair. Besides this skin contact, spray products require additional considerations in regard to potential inhalation for building a robust and reliable safety assessment. Over the years, cosmetic industry developed prediction models for the best estimate of inhalation exposure combining data from computer simulation programs available in the market, individual real measured data and last but not least the experience from the market. Such attempt is driven by the toxicological profile of individual used ingredients. The focus of this review is on the determination of inhalation exposure, and the derivation of safe exposure levels for cosmetic spray products. Many of the methods employed to ensure product safety of cosmetic sprays in accordance with the general requirements of the EC Cosmetics Directive are based on industry experience which are not necessarily consistent across companies. This paper presents an approach to compile common principles for risk assessment and thus contribute to standardisation of safety assessment methodologies utilized for spray product evaluation without interfering with the flexibility of the individual safety assessor. It is based on the experience within the author's companies and may be useful as a support document as well for SME (Small and Medium Enterprises) companies safety assessors. In this respect it can be seen as one fundamental step in a tiered approach of cosmetic spray safety evaluation.

[1]  Karen Blackburn,et al.  Application of the threshold of toxicological concern approach to ingredients in personal and household care products. , 2005, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[2]  David Vernez,et al.  Acute Respiratory Syndrome After Inhalation of Waterproofing Sprays: A Posteriori Exposure-Response Assessment in 102 Cases , 2006, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[3]  H. van Loveren,et al.  Prevention of work‐related airway allergies; summary of the advice from the Health Council of the Netherlands , 2008, Allergy.

[4]  Ulrich Mohr,et al.  Experimental approaches to evaluate respiratory allergy in animal models. , 2005, Experimental and Toxicological Pathology.

[5]  Philip Carthew,et al.  SAFETY ASSESSMENT FOR HAIR-SPRAY RESINS: RISK ASSESSMENT BASED ON RODENT INHALATION STUDIES , 2002, Inhalation toxicology.

[6]  Günter Oberdörster,et al.  TOXICOKINETICS AND EFFECTS OF FIBROUS AND NONFIBROUS PARTICLES , 2002, Inhalation toxicology.

[7]  Jürgen Pauluhn,et al.  Comparative pulmonary response to inhaled nanostructures: considerations on test design and endpoints , 2009, Inhalation toxicology.

[8]  H Greim,et al.  Toxicity of fibers and particles. Report of the workshop held in Munich, Germany, 26-27 October 2000. , 2001, Inhalation toxicology.

[9]  Darrell R Boverhof,et al.  Respiratory sensitization and allergy: current research approaches and needs. , 2008, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[10]  J L Mauderly,et al.  Relevance of particle-induced rat lung tumors for assessing lung carcinogenic hazard and human lung cancer risk. , 1997, Environmental health perspectives.

[11]  Bremmer Hj,et al.  Cosmetics Fact Sheet. To assess the risks for the consumer. Updated version for ConsExpo 4 , 2006 .

[12]  B. Brunekreef,et al.  IMMUNE BIOMARKERS IN RELATION TO EXPOSURE TO PARTICULATE MATTER: A Cross-Sectional Survey in 17 Cities of Central Europe , 2000, Inhalation toxicology.

[13]  Natalie W. Harrington,et al.  Recommended distributions for exposure factors frequently used in health risk assessment. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[14]  Stephen S. Olin,et al.  THE RELEVANCE OF THE RAT LUNG RESPONSE TO PARTICLE OVERLOAD FOR HUMAN RISK ASSESSMENT: A Workshop Consensus Report , 2000, Inhalation toxicology.

[15]  S. Gutsell,et al.  Exposure based waiving: the application of the toxicological threshold of concern (TTC) to inhalation exposure for aerosol ingredients in consumer products. , 2009, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[16]  Helmut Greim,et al.  Application of the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) to the safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients. , 2007, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[17]  Michael J Oldham,et al.  Aerosol dosimetry considerations. , 2006, Clinics in occupational and environmental medicine.

[18]  Anne Marie Api,et al.  Exposure data for personal care products: hairspray, spray perfume, liquid foundation, shampoo, body wash, and solid antiperspirant. , 2006, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[19]  John Frangos,et al.  The Concentration of No Toxicological Concern (CoNTC): A Risk Assessment Screening Tool for Air Toxics , 2007, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[20]  Cees de Heer,et al.  Dose-Response Relationships and Threshold Levels in Skin and Respiratory Allergy , 2006, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[21]  J. Heyder,et al.  Deposition of particles in the human respiratory tract in the size range 0.005–15 μm , 1986 .

[22]  B. Huber,et al.  The New EC Cosmetics Regulation 1223/2009 Contents and First Explanations , 2010 .

[23]  C McNamara,et al.  European consumer exposure to cosmetic products, a framework for conducting population exposure assessments. , 2007, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[24]  Bremmer Hj,et al.  General fact sheet - Limiting conditions and reliability, ventilation, room size, body surface area. Updated version for ConsExpo 4 , 2006 .

[25]  I Mangelsdorf,et al.  Inhalation toxicity of mineral particles: critical appraisal of endpoints and study design. , 2003, Toxicology letters.

[26]  S E Escher,et al.  Evaluation of inhalation TTC values with the database RepDose. , 2010, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.