Effects of premixed methane concentration on distribution of flame region and hazard effects in a tube and a tunnel gas explosion

Abstract Study of flame distribution laws and the hazard effects in a tunnel gas explosion accident is of great importance for safety issue. However, it has not yet been fully explored. The object of present work is mainly to study the effects of premixed gas concentration on the distribution law of the flame region and the hazard effects involving methane-air explosion in a tube and a tunnel based on experimental and numerical results. The experiments were conducted in a tube with one end closed and the other open. The tube was partially filled with premixed methane-air mixture with six different premixed methane concentrations. Major simulation works were performed in a full-scale tunnel with a length of 1000 m. The first 56 m of the tunnel were occupied by methane–air mixture. Results show that the flame region is always longer than the original gas region in any case. Concentration has significant effects on the flame region distribution and the explosion behaviors. In the tube, peak overpressures and maximum rates of overpressure rise (dp/dt) max for mixtures with lower and higher concentrations are great lower than that for mixtures close to stoichiometric concentration. Due to the gas diffusion effect, not the stoichiometric mixture but the mixture with a slightly higher concentration of 11% gets the highest peak overpressure and the shock wave speed along the tube. In the full-scale tunnel, for fuel lean and stoichiometric mixture, the maximum peak combustion rates is achieved before arriving at the boundary of the original methane accumulation region, while for fuel rich mixture, the maximum value appears beyond the region. It is also found that the flame region for the case of stoichiometric mixture is the shortest as 72 m since the higher explosion intensity shortens the gas diffusion time. The case for concentration of 13% can reach up to a longest value of 128 m for longer diffusion time and the abundant fuel. The “serious injury and death” zone caused by shock wave may reach up to 3–8 times of the length of the original methane occupied region, which is the widest damage region.

[1]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Coupling Relation Between Air Shockwave and High-Temperature Flow from Explosion of Methane in Air , 2012 .

[2]  A. Di Benedetto,et al.  CFD analysis of gas explosions vented through relief pipes. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[3]  Kees van Wingerden,et al.  Gas explosion handbook , 1997 .

[4]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Hazard effects of high‐speed flow from methane‐hydrogen premixed explosions , 2014 .

[5]  B. Launder,et al.  Mathematical Models of turbulence , 1972 .

[6]  K. Westerterp,et al.  Effect of tube size and obstacles on explosion limits in flowing gases , 1999 .

[7]  Lei Pang,et al.  Influence of laneway support spacing on methane/air explosion shock wave , 2012 .

[8]  K. Bray,et al.  Studies of the turbulent burning velocity , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[9]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Nonlinear distribution characteristics of flame regions from methane–air explosions in coal tunnels , 2014 .

[10]  Xu Jing-de,et al.  Experimental study on mine gas explosion diffusion , 2004 .

[11]  Tron Solberg,et al.  Investigations to improve and assess the accuracy of computational fluid dynamic based explosion models , 1996 .

[12]  E. Salzano,et al.  Numerical simulation of turbulent gas flames in tubes. , 2002, Journal of hazardous materials.

[13]  S. Patankar Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow , 2018, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.

[14]  Bretislav Janovsky,et al.  Vented confined explosions in Stramberk experimental mine and AutoReaGas simulation , 2006 .

[15]  John H. S. Lee,et al.  Flame acceleration due to turbulence produced by obstacles , 1980 .

[16]  Gennaro Russo,et al.  Simulation of VCEs by CFD modelling: an analysis of sensitivity , 1998 .

[17]  P. Roth,et al.  An experimental investigation of flame behavior during explosions in cylindrical enclosures with obstacles , 1989 .

[18]  Jan Kindracki,et al.  Influence of ignition position and obstacles on explosion development in methane–air mixture in closed vessels , 2007 .

[19]  Mehdi Bidabadi,et al.  Investigation of effective dimensionless numbers on initiation of instability in combustion of moisty organic dust , 2014 .

[20]  Mingshu Bi,et al.  Effects of obstacles and deposited coal dust on characteristics of premixed methane–air explosions in a long closed pipe , 2012 .