Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Assessment with Ultrasonography: Value of Inlet-to-Outlet Median Nerve Area Ratio in Patients versus Healthy Volunteers

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of the Inlet-to-outlet median nerve area ratio (IOR) in patients with clinically and electrophysiologically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods Forty-six wrists in 46 consecutive patients with clinical and electrodiagnostic evidence of CTS and forty-four wrists in 44 healthy volunteers were examined with ultrasonography. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve was measured at the carpal tunnel inlet (the level of scaphoid-pisiform) and outlet (the level of the hook of the hamate), and the IOR was calculated for each wrist. Ultrasonography and electrodiagnostic tests were performed under blinded conditions. Electrodiagnostic testing combined with clinical symptoms were considered to be the gold standard test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic value between the inlet CSA and IOR. Results The study population included 16 men and 30 women (mean age, 45.3 years; range, 18–83 years). The control population included 18 men and 26 women (mean age, 50.4 years; range, 18–79 years). The mean inlet CSA was 8.7 mm2 in healthy controls and 14.6mm2 in CTS group (P<0.001). The mean IOR in healthy volunteers (1.0) was smaller than that in patients (1.6, P<0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed a diagnostic advantage to using the IOR rather than the inlet CSA (P<0.01). An IOR cutoff value of ≥ 1.3 would yield 93% specificity and 91% sensitivity in the diagnosis of CTS. Conclusion The IOR of median nerve area promises to be an effective means in the diagnosis of CTS. A large-scale, randomized controlled trial is required to determine how and when this parameter will be used.

[1]  Hyoung-Seop Kim,et al.  Comparison of proximal and distal cross-sectional areas of the median nerve, carpal tunnel, and nerve/tunnel index in subjects with carpal tunnel syndrome. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  T. Ohtsuki,et al.  Ultrasonographic reference sizes of the median and ulnar nerves and the cervical nerve roots in healthy Japanese adults. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  J. Yoon,et al.  Reference values for nerve ultrasonography in the upper extremity , 2013, Muscle & nerve.

[4]  Krishna Kumar,et al.  Ultrasonographic cross‐sectional area normal values of the ulnar nerve along its course in the arm with electrophysiological correlations in 100 asian subjects , 2013, Muscle & nerve.

[5]  A. Ulasli,et al.  Reasons for using swelling ratio in sonographic diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and a reliable method for its calculation , 2013, Muscle & nerve.

[6]  E. Wilder-Smith,et al.  Carpal tunnel syndrome—median nerve enlargement restricted to the distal carpal tunnel , 2012, Muscle & nerve.

[7]  A. Boon,et al.  Evidence‐based guideline: Neuromuscular ultrasound for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome , 2012, Muscle & nerve.

[8]  R. Werner,et al.  Electrodiagnostic evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome , 2011, Muscle & nerve.

[9]  M. Sojer,et al.  Bifid median nerve in carpal tunnel syndrome: assessment with US cross-sectional area measurement. , 2011, Radiology.

[10]  A. Pestronk,et al.  Peripheral nerve size in normals and patients with polyneuropathy: An ultrasound study , 2009, Muscle & nerve.

[11]  K. A. Cullen,et al.  Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. , 2009, National health statistics reports.

[12]  F. Walker,et al.  Ultrasonographic Reference Values for Assessing the Normal Median Nerve in Adults , 2009, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[13]  J. Hung,et al.  Best diagnostic criterion in high-resolution ultrasonography for carpal tunnel syndrome. , 2008, Chang Gung medical journal.

[14]  Elizabeth A. Rechtsteiner,et al.  Ambulatory medical care utilization estimates for 2006. , 2008, National health statistics reports.

[15]  D. Sanders,et al.  The ultrasonographic wrist-to-forearm median nerve area ratio in carpal tunnel syndrome , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  F. Walker,et al.  Cross‐sectional area reference values for nerve ultrasonography , 2008, Muscle & nerve.

[17]  B. Kaymak,et al.  A comparison of the benefits of sonography and electrophysiologic measurements as predictors of symptom severity and functional status in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  G. Cerri,et al.  Ultrasound features of carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective case-control study , 2007, Skeletal Radiology.

[19]  L. McCaig,et al.  Ambulatory medical care utilization estimates for 2005. , 2007, Advance data.

[20]  L. Visser,et al.  High-resolution sonography versus EMG in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome , 2007, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[21]  I. Keleş,et al.  Diagnostic Precision of Ultrasonography in Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome , 2005, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[22]  S. Reichenbach,et al.  Diagnostic value of sonography in patients with suspected carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective study. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[23]  Ka Sing Wong,et al.  Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnostic usefulness of sonography. , 2004, Radiology.

[24]  T. Naidich,et al.  The carpal tunnel: ultrasound display of normal imaging anatomy and pathology. , 2004, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[25]  H. Bittermann,et al.  The potential value of ultrasonography in the evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome , 2003, Neurology.

[26]  L. Visser,et al.  Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: A critical review of the literature , 2003, Muscle & nerve.

[27]  K. Nakamichi,et al.  Ultrasonographic measurement of median nerve cross‐sectional area in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: Diagnostic accuracy , 2002, Muscle & nerve.

[28]  A. Schenone,et al.  Sonography of the median nerve in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  K. Nakamichi,et al.  Enlarged median nerve in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome , 2000, Muscle & nerve.

[30]  W. Kenn,et al.  Technical advances in ultrasound and MR imaging of carpal tunnel syndrome , 2000, European Radiology.

[31]  M. Langer,et al.  MR imaging of the carpal tunnel. , 1997, European journal of radiology.

[32]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: III. How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Test: B. What Are the Results and Will They Help Me In Caring for My Patients? , 1994 .

[33]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1994, JAMA.

[34]  Practice parameter for carpal tunnel syndrome (Summary statement) , 1993, Neurology.

[35]  W. Buchberger,et al.  Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnosis with high-resolution sonography. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[36]  W. Buchberger,et al.  High‐resolution ultrasonography of the carpal tunnel. , 1991, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[37]  C. Schneck,et al.  Carpal tunnel: MR imaging. Part II. Carpal tunnel syndrome. , 1989, Radiology.

[38]  J. Fleiss The design and analysis of clinical experiments , 1987 .