Spatial characteristics of transportation hubs: centrality and intermediacy

Centrality and intermediacy are identified in this article as spatial qualities that enhance the traffic levels of transportation hubs, and hence indicate which places are strategically located within transportation systems. The local, regional, national, continental or hemispheric centrality of a city has a fundamental impact on the city's own size and function and on its traffic-generating powers. Intermediacy, while it may reflect a natural geographical ‘in betweenness’, is a spatial quality that needs to be defined in the specific context of contemporary or prospective transportation systems and networks. Intermediate places can be given extra traffic if they are favoured by transport carriers as connecting hubs or relay points in the system. Passenger traffic data at US airports and container traffic at US and foreign seaports are used to illustrate these concepts of strategic commercial location. In many instances we are able to differentiate between true origin-destination and connecting traffic, giving a rough idea of the comparative contributions of the centrality and intermediacy factors to the traffic totals. It is no surprise that all large transportion hubs possess, at some scale and to some degree, both locational attributes — centrality and intermediacy.

[1]  E. J. Taaffe,et al.  Geography of Transportation , 1973 .

[2]  Crane Brinton The Americans and the French , 1968 .

[3]  A. J. Sargent Seaports and Hinterlands , 1939 .

[4]  Colin Clark,et al.  World commerce and governments , 1955 .

[5]  Gilbert J. Butland,et al.  The Port of Chicago and the St. Lawrence Seaway , 1958 .

[6]  Anthony Sampson Empires of the sky , 1984 .

[7]  H. Nelson,et al.  The West European City. , 1953 .

[8]  Anthony Giddens,et al.  Social theory and modern sociology , 1988 .

[9]  Edward J. Taaffe Air Transportation and United States Urban Distribution , 1956 .

[10]  James Bird,et al.  Seaports and seaport terminals , 1971 .

[11]  W. Siddall,et al.  Geography as Spatial Interaction , 1980 .

[12]  Douglas K. Fleming,et al.  ON THE BEATEN TRACK : A VIEW OF US WEST-COAST CONTAINER PORT COMPETITION , 1989 .

[13]  A. Lösch The economics of location , 1954 .

[14]  Yehuda Hayut Containerization and the Load Center Concept , 1981 .

[15]  Carl W. Condit,et al.  Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West , 1991 .

[16]  M. Greenhut,et al.  Location and Space Economy , 1958 .

[17]  Michael Chisholm Rural settlement and land use , 1962 .

[18]  W. H. Parker,et al.  Mackinder--geography as an aid to statecraft , 1982 .

[19]  Nellie B. b. Allen,et al.  The New Europe , 1996 .

[20]  B. Berry,et al.  Central places in Southern Germany , 1967 .

[21]  Yehuda Hayuth,et al.  Load centering competition and modal integration , 1991 .

[22]  Arthur Reed THE UNLOCKING OF HEATHROW. , 1991 .

[23]  Guido G. Weigend Some Elements in the Study of Port Geography , 1958 .

[24]  Kenneth Royston Sealy The geography of air transport , 1957 .

[25]  Van Zandt,et al.  The geography of world air transport , 1944 .