Though legislatures and agencies are considering how to prevent further climate change, some adverse effects from a warming climate are already inevitable. Adapting to these effects is essential, but regulators and scholars have largely neglected this need. This Article evaluates the capacity of natural resource governance to cope with the effects of climate change, and provides a framework for Congress to help it do so.The Article identifies unprecedented uncertainty as the paramount impediment raised by climate change, and demonstrates how existing fragmented governance is poorly adapted to deal with this challenge. Drawing on lessons from prior regulatory experiments, it proposes a comprehensive strategy for managing uncertainty that promotes interagency information sharing. It also recommends that legislators adopt an "adaptive governance" framework that requires agencies to systematically monitor and adapt their decisions and programs. This learning infrastructure would promote agency learning and accountability, help manage uncertainty, and reduce the likelihood and magnitude of mistakes expected to come with facing such an exceptional problem with initially imprecise tools.The Article operates on four levels. First, it uses case studies to illustrate valuable lessons about the challenges of creating effective natural resource management. Second, the Article is anchored in the specific implications of climate change, considering the value of interagency information sharing and adaptive governance in addressing climate effects. Third, it engages the growing theoretical literature on adaptive management and federalism. Finally, it provides insight on how agencies can manage uncertainty that has far-reaching implications for other areas of administrative regulation.
[1]
William W. Buzbee.
Interaction's Promise: Preemption Policy Shifts, Risk Regulation, and Experimentalism Lessons
,
2008
.
[2]
W. Neil Adger,et al.
Does Adaptive Management of Natural Resources Enhance Resilience to Climate Change
,
2004
.
[3]
S. Schwarcz.
Regulating Complexity in Financial Markets
,
2010
.
[4]
R. Schapiro.
Polyphonic Federalism: State Constitutions in the Federal Courts
,
1999
.
[5]
Daniel A. Farber.
Bringing Environmental Assessment into the Digital Age
,
2006
.
[6]
A. O'Connell.
The Architecture of Smart Intelligence: Structuring and Overseeing Agencies in the Post-9/11 World
,
2006
.
[7]
J. B. Ruhl,et al.
Regulation by Adaptive Management - is it Possible?
,
2005
.
[8]
U. Fish.
Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants
,
1987
.