Centralized and decentralized process and sensor fault monitoring using data fusion based on adaptive extended Kalman filter algorithm

Abstract This paper presents an integrated design framework to utilize multi-sensor data fusion (MSDF) techniques for process monitoring enhancement to detect and diagnose sensor and process faults. Two different distributed and centralized architectures are presented to integrate the multi-sensor data based on extended Kalman filter (EKF) data fusion algorithm. The distributed integration architecture uses the state-vector fusion method, while the centralized integration architecture is based on the output augmented fusion (OAF) method. The usual approach in the classical EKF implementation is based on the assumption of constant diagonal matrices for both the process and measurement covariances. This inflexible constant covariance set-up may cause degradation in the EKF performance. A new adaptive modified EKF (AMEKF) algorithm has been developed to prevent the filter divergence and hence leading to an improved EKF estimation. A set of simulation studies have been conducted to demonstrate the performances of the proposed adaptive and non-adaptive process monitoring approaches on a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) benchmark problem. The sensor fault studies include the sensor faults due to drift in calibration and drift in sensor degradation anomalies. Whereas, the process faults consist of four probable CSTR faults in cascaded single, double, triple and quadruple set-up.

[1]  Rolf Isermann,et al.  Process Fault Detection Based on Modeling and Estimation Methods , 1982 .

[2]  N E Manos,et al.  Stochastic Models , 1960, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2nd Ed..

[3]  Rolf Isermann,et al.  Process fault detection based on modeling and estimation methods - A survey , 1984, Autom..

[4]  M. Dohnal,et al.  Fuzzy strategy for failure detection and safety control of complex processes , 1985 .

[5]  Alan S. Willsky,et al.  A survey of design methods for failure detection in dynamic systems , 1976, Autom..

[6]  W. A. Wolfe Fault tree analysis , 1978 .

[7]  Yih Yuan Hsu,et al.  A self-learning fault diagnosis system based on reinforcement learning , 1992 .

[8]  Ashok K. Goel Adaptive Modeling , 2002 .

[9]  N. Sawattanakit,et al.  Process fault detection and diagnosis in CSTR system using on-line approximator , 1998, IEEE. APCCAS 1998. 1998 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems. Microelectronics and Integrating Systems. Proceedings (Cat. No.98EX242).

[10]  D. Chakrabarti,et al.  A fast fixed - point algorithm for independent component analysis , 1997 .

[11]  William L. Luyben,et al.  Process Modeling, Simulation and Control for Chemical Engineers , 1973 .

[12]  Ji Zhang,et al.  Fault diagnosis approach based on the integration of qualitative model and quantitative knowledge of signed directed graph , 2005, 2005 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[13]  C. J. Harris,et al.  Comparison of two measurement fusion methods for Kalman-filter-based multisensor data fusion , 2001 .

[14]  Xia Hong,et al.  Adaptive Modelling, Estimation and Fusion from Data: A Neurofuzzy Approach , 2002, Advanced information processing.

[15]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  A Fast Fixed-Point Algorithm for Independent Component Analysis , 1997, Neural Computation.

[16]  Mark A. Kramer,et al.  A rule‐based approach to fault diagnosis using the signed directed graph , 1987 .

[17]  Kristian Kroschel,et al.  Issues in Decentralized Kalman Filters , 2004 .

[18]  C. H. Lie,et al.  Fault Tree Analysis, Methods, and Applications ߝ A Review , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[19]  David Mautner Himmelblau,et al.  Fault detection and diagnosis in chemical and petrochemical processes , 1978 .