Teacher Evaluation in Primary and Secondary Schools: A Systematic Review of SSCI Journal Publications from 2012 to 2022

This study revealed the current situation and developments in teacher evaluation in primary and secondary schools by reviewing 54 articles published in the recent decade (i.e., from January 2012 to October 2022). The coding scheme was developed based on the three components of effective teacher evaluation systems: “what”, “how”, and “who”. Specifically, we investigated the frameworks used for teacher evaluation, methods of evaluation, and participants in teacher evaluation. Based on our results, most studies evaluated teachers from the dimension of Instructional Support. Evaluation through video recording became popular due to technological advancement. Further, an increasing number of schools invited external experts to conduct teacher evaluations to ensure fairness. We also identified several crucial factors for teacher development: effective use of teaching resources and technology, high-quality feedback and communication, emotional support, classroom organization, and professional responsibilities. Due to COVID-19, many schools adopted distance learning, prompting the need to develop technological skills for teachers. Through the in-depth analysis of the current situation and development trends in the various dimensions of teacher evaluation in primary and secondary education, future research directions and issues were discussed and explored in this review.

[1]  A. Chia,et al.  “From the beginning, I think it was a stretch” – teachers’ perceptions and practices in teaching multiliteracies , 2022, English Teaching: Practice & Critique.

[2]  Mohammed Amin Almaiah,et al.  Actual Use of Mobile Learning Technologies during Social Distancing Circumstances: Case Study of King Faisal University Students , 2022, Sustainability.

[3]  Shu Zhang,et al.  Characteristics of Chinese high-quality mathematics lessons from a lesson structure perspective , 2022, ZDM – Mathematics Education.

[4]  L. Kohnke,et al.  A bibliometric analysis of the trends and research topics of empirical research on TPACK , 2022, Education and Information Technologies.

[5]  Renli Li Chinese folk music: Study and dissemination through online learning courses , 2022, Education and Information Technologies : Official Journal of the IFIP technical committee on Education.

[6]  C. Chai,et al.  Exploring secondary school teachers’ TPACK for video-based flipped learning: the role of pedagogical beliefs , 2022, Educ. Inf. Technol..

[7]  Kirsti Klette,et al.  Teacher feedback on procedural skills, conceptual understanding, and mathematical practices: A video study in lower secondary mathematics classrooms , 2022, Teaching and Teacher Education.

[8]  Jeremy M. Law,et al.  Supporting primary school students' mental health needs: Teachers' perceptions of roles, barriers, and abilities , 2022, Psychology in the Schools.

[9]  Wei Chen,et al.  Developing a plugged-in class observation protocol in high-school blended STEM classes: Student engagement, teacher behaviors and student-teacher interaction patterns , 2021, Comput. Educ..

[10]  Kevin M. Wong,et al.  Digital competence and online language teaching: Hong Kong language teacher practices in primary and secondary classrooms , 2021, System.

[11]  Lawrence Branco Sekalegga An analysis of four instructional strategies used by secondary school music teachers in Uganda , 2021, International Journal of Music Education.

[12]  L. Haerens,et al.  Effectiveness of a lesson study intervention on teacher behaviour and student motivation in physical education lessons , 2021, Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy.

[13]  Daniel Martos-García,et al.  Emancipation or simulation? The pedagogy of ignorance and action research in PETE , 2021, Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy.

[14]  S. Aslan,et al.  Teachers' views related the middle school curriculum for distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2021, Education and Information Technologies.

[15]  Talal Almutairi,et al.  Teacher evaluation by different internal evaluators: Head of departments, teachers themselves, peers and students , 2021, International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE).

[16]  Rabiya Saboowala,et al.  Readiness of In-service Teachers Toward a Blended Learning Approach as a Learning Pedagogy in the Post-COVID-19 Era , 2021, Journal of Educational Technology Systems.

[17]  Ahmad Arif Widianto,et al.  Educational Transformation: An Evaluation of Online Learning Due To COVID-19 , 2021, Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn..

[18]  M. Sutherland,et al.  Cost-effective Analyses of an Urban Public School District's Classroom Breakfast Program. , 2021, The Journal of school health.

[19]  Ruofei Zhang,et al.  Types, features, and effectiveness of technologies in collaborative writing for second language learning , 2021, Computer Assisted Language Learning.

[20]  Sigrid Blömeke,et al.  Novice and expert teachers’ situation-specific skills regarding classroom management: What do they perceive, interpret and suggest? , 2021 .

[21]  Haoran Xie,et al.  Top-N personalized recommendation with graph neural networks in MOOCs , 2021, Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell..

[22]  Kui Xie,et al.  Investing Time in Technology: Teachers’ Value Beliefs and Time Cost Profiles for Classroom Technology Integration , 2020, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[23]  Haoran Xie,et al.  A systematic review of research on flipped language classrooms: theoretical foundations, learning activities, tools, research topics and findings , 2020, Computer Assisted Language Learning.

[24]  Y. Soysal Talking Science , 2020, Science & Education.

[25]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Preparing educators for the time of COVID … and beyond , 2020 .

[26]  Chrysi Rapanta,et al.  Online University Teaching During and After the Covid-19 Crisis: Refocusing Teacher Presence and Learning Activity , 2020, Postdigital Science and Education.

[27]  P. Trofimovich,et al.  Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about second language pronunciation teaching, their experience, and speech assessments , 2020, Language Teaching Research.

[28]  Ruofei Zhang,et al.  Types, purposes, and effectiveness of state-of-the-art technologies for second and foreign language learning , 2020, Computer Assisted Language Learning.

[29]  Vesal Dini,et al.  Characterizing the formative assessment enactment of experienced science teachers , 2020 .

[30]  A. Sezen-Barrie,et al.  Science teachers' sensemaking of the use of epistemic tools to scaffold students' knowledge (re)construction in classrooms , 2020 .

[31]  Siv M. Gamlem,et al.  Teacher–student interactions and feedback in English as a foreign language classrooms , 2020 .

[32]  A. Yeung,et al.  Competence and challenge in professional development: teacher perceptions at different stages of career , 2020 .

[33]  Deniz Ünal,et al.  A Lesson Study to Develop Teachers' Geometric Habits of Mind , 2020 .

[34]  School Peer Review for Educational Improvement and Accountability , 2020, Accountability and Educational Improvement.

[35]  Haoran Xie,et al.  Application and theory gaps during the rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education , 2020, Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell..

[36]  J. Kabele,et al.  Social Constructivism , 2020, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[37]  Xinmin Zheng,et al.  Differentiated teacher evaluation and professional learning: policies and practices for promoting career growth , 2021, Teacher Development.

[38]  Sirpa Kärkkäinen,et al.  Biology student teachers’ dialogic talk in inquiry-based instruction , 2020, Journal of Biological Education.

[39]  Zuway-R. Hong,et al.  Exploring the pedagogical features of integrating essential competencies of scientific inquiry in classroom teaching , 2020, Research in Science & Technological Education.

[40]  T. C. Nochumson Elementary schoolteachers’ use of Twitter: exploring the implications of learning through online social media , 2019, Professional Development in Education.

[41]  Haoran Xie,et al.  How to facilitate self-regulated learning? A case study on open educational resources , 2019, Journal of Computers in Education.

[42]  S. Schmier Performing the performance assessment , 2019, English Teaching: Practice & Critique.

[43]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  Trends and development in technology-enhanced adaptive/personalized learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2017 , 2019, Comput. Educ..

[44]  Minhong Wang,et al.  Personalized word learning for university students: a profile-based method for e-learning systems , 2019, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[45]  Y. Soysal,et al.  Relationships Between Teacher Discursive Moves and Middle School Students’ Cognitive Contributions to Science Concepts , 2019, Research in Science Education.

[46]  Guili Zhang,et al.  Preservice Teacher Experiences Implementing Classroom Management Practices Through Mixed-Reality Simulations , 2019, Rural Special Education Quarterly.

[47]  B. Wei,et al.  An Investigation of Sources of Science Teachers’ Practical Knowledge of Teaching with Practical Work , 2019 .

[48]  Malcolm Swan,et al.  Using digital technology to enhance formative assessment in mathematics classrooms , 2019, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[49]  Evrim Baran,et al.  Observing the Indicators of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Classrooms: Video-Based Research , 2019, Journal of Research on Technology in Education.

[50]  Zelha Tunç-Pekkan,et al.  Mathematical Opportunities: Noticing and Acting , 2015, TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM.

[51]  Kemal Izci,et al.  Attending to assessment problems of practice during community-centered professional development , 2019, International Journal of Educational Research.

[52]  J. Vermunt,et al.  The role of pupil voice as a trigger for teacher learning in Lesson Study professional groups , 2018, Cambridge Journal of Education.

[53]  G. McNamara,et al.  Integrated Co-Professional Evaluation? Converging Approaches to School Evaluation Across Frontiers , 2018, Australian Journal of Teacher Education.

[54]  Kui Xie,et al.  A systematic review of design and technology components of educational digital resources , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[55]  R. Bakeman,et al.  Developing knowledge-in-action with a learning progression: Sequential analysis of teachers' questions and responses to student ideas , 2018, Teaching and Teacher Education.

[56]  Diego Palacios,et al.  Evaluating the quality of teaching: can there be valid differentiation in the middle of the performance distribution? , 2018, School Effectiveness and School Improvement.

[57]  Michael B. Sherry,et al.  Positioning in prospective secondary English teachers’ annotations of teaching videos , 2018, English Teaching: Practice & Critique.

[58]  B. Neuhaus,et al.  Effects of three basic dimensions of instructional quality on students’ situational interest in sixth-grade biology instruction , 2018, Learning and Instruction.

[59]  Alain Gholam A Mentoring Experience: From the Perspective of a Novice Teacher , 2018 .

[60]  Charlotte Dignath,et al.  Teachers’ direct and indirect promotion of self-regulated learning in primary and secondary school mathematics classes – insights from video-based classroom observations and teacher interviews , 2018 .

[61]  Henderien W. Steenbeek,et al.  The Effects of Video Feedback Coaching for Teachers on Scientific Knowledge of Primary Students , 2018 .

[62]  J. Gore,et al.  Effects of professional development on the quality of teaching: Results from a randomised controlled trial of Quality Teaching Rounds , 2017 .

[63]  K. Kiemer,et al.  Quality Talk and dialogic teaching—an examination of a professional development programme on secondary teachers’ facilitation of student talk , 2017 .

[64]  M. Holmqvist,et al.  Analysing teachers' operations when teaching students: what constitutes scientific theories? , 2017 .

[65]  G. J. Kelly,et al.  From the teacher’s eyes: facilitating teachers noticings on informal formative assessments (IFAs) and exploring the challenges to effective implementation , 2017 .

[66]  Ian A. G. Wilkinson,et al.  Toward a more dialogic pedagogy: changing teachers’ beliefs and practices through professional development in language arts classrooms , 2017 .

[67]  G. McNamara,et al.  External specialist support for school self-evaluation: Testing a model of support in Irish post-primary schools , 2017 .

[68]  I. M. Evans,et al.  Warming the Emotional Climate of the Classroom: Can Teachers' Social-Emotional Skills Change?. , 2016 .

[69]  R. Lambert,et al.  Primary Grades Teachers’ Instructional Decisions During Online Mathematics Professional Development Activities , 2016 .

[70]  Sara C. Heredia,et al.  Teachers’ formative assessment abilities and their relationship to student learning: findings from a four-year intervention study , 2016 .

[71]  Xiufeng Liu,et al.  Using Rasch measurement to validate an instrument for measuring the quality of classroom teaching in secondary chemistry lessons , 2016 .

[72]  Min-Ling Hung,et al.  Teacher readiness for online learning: Scale development and teacher perceptions , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[73]  S. Gutierez Building a classroom-based professional learning community through lesson study: insights from elementary school science teachers , 2016 .

[74]  B. A. Ermeling,et al.  Expanding Instructional Horizons: A Case Study of Teacher Team-Outside Expert Partnerships , 2016, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[75]  A. Hult,et al.  Teacher ambivalence towards school evaluation: promoting and ruining teacher professionalism , 2016 .

[76]  Raymond Y. K. Lau,et al.  Generating Incidental Word-Learning Tasks via Topic-Based and Load-Based Profiles , 2016, IEEE MultiMedia.

[77]  W. Grift,et al.  A longitudinal study of induction on the acceleration of growth in teaching quality of beginning teachers through the eyes of their students , 2015 .

[78]  S. Brindley,et al.  “Resisting the rage for certainty”: dialogic assessment: A case study of one secondary English subject classroom in the UK , 2015 .

[79]  Hsien-Chang Tsai,et al.  Collaborative Professional Development of Mentor Teachers and Pre-Service Teachers in Relation to Technology Integration , 2015, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[80]  Sigrid Blömeke,et al.  Early Career Mathematics Teachers’ General Pedagogical Knowledge and Skills: Do Teacher Education, Teaching Experience, and Working Conditions Make a Difference? , 2015 .

[81]  R. Maulana,et al.  Within-year changes of lesson structure: an exploration of pedagogical functions of lessons by means of multilevel growth curve modelling in Indonesia , 2015 .

[82]  Russell Tytler,et al.  Expert Teachers’ Discursive Moves in Science Classroom Interactive Talk , 2015 .

[83]  Berit S. Haug,et al.  Formative Assessment and Teachers' Sensitivity to Student Responses , 2015 .

[84]  P. Norman,et al.  Using Internal and External Evaluation to Shape Teacher Preparation Curriculum: A Model for Continuous Program Improvement , 2015 .

[85]  E. V. Es,et al.  Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers' ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking , 2015 .

[86]  M. Chi,et al.  The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes , 2014 .

[87]  T. Seidel,et al.  Modeling and Measuring the Structure of Professional Vision in Preservice Teachers , 2014 .

[88]  Courtney A. Bell,et al.  The Instructional Challenge in Improving Teaching Quality: Lessons from a Classroom Observation Protocol , 2014, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[89]  Siv M. Gamlem,et al.  Mapping the quality of feedback to support students’ learning in lower secondary classrooms , 2014 .

[90]  Christine Howe,et al.  Classroom dialogue: a systematic review across four decades of research , 2013 .

[91]  Alexander Renkl,et al.  Instructional strategies for using video in teacher education , 2013 .

[92]  S. Benson,et al.  Teaching with Technology: Using Tpack to Understand Teaching Expertise in Online Higher Education , 2013 .

[93]  Felicitas Thiel,et al.  Training Inservice Teachers' Competencies in Classroom Management. A Quasi-Experimental Study with Teachers of Secondary Schools. , 2013 .

[94]  Pam Grossman,et al.  Measure for Measure: The Relationship between Measures of Instructional Practice in Middle School English Language Arts and Teachers' Value-Added Scores. NBER Working Paper No. 16015. , 2010 .

[95]  J. Papay Refocusing the Debate: Assessing the Purposes and Tools of Teacher Evaluation , 2012 .

[96]  John Hattie,et al.  Visible learning for teachers: maximizing impact on learning, 1st Edition , 2012 .

[97]  Heather C. Hill,et al.  A Validity Argument Approach to Evaluating Teacher Value-Added Scores , 2011 .

[98]  K. Herman,et al.  Supporting Children's Mental Health in Schools: Teacher Perceptions of Needs, Roles, and Barriers. , 2011 .

[99]  D. Wiliam What Is Assessment for Learning , 2011 .

[100]  Ricki Goldman,et al.  Conducting Video Research in the Learning Sciences: Guidance on Selection, Analysis, Technology, and Ethics , 2010 .

[101]  U. Meierhenrich,et al.  Characterization of volatile compounds of Indian cress absolute by GC-olfactometry/VIDEO-sniff and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography. , 2010, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.

[102]  Ahmet Aypay Teachers' Evaluation of Their Pre-Service Teacher Training. , 2009 .

[103]  K. Green,et al.  Pedagogical Content Knowledge as a Foundation for an Interdisciplinary Graduate Program. , 2009 .

[104]  Mark T. Greenberg,et al.  The Prosocial Classroom: Teacher Social and Emotional Competence in Relation to Student and Classroom Outcomes , 2009 .

[105]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) , 2009 .

[106]  James Pitt,et al.  Blurring the Boundaries--STEM Education and Education for Sustainable Development. , 2009 .

[107]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[108]  Nicole B. Kersting,et al.  Using Video Clips of Mathematics Classroom Instruction as Item Prompts to Measure Teachers' Knowledge of Teaching Mathematics , 2008 .

[109]  V. Shute Focus on Formative Feedback , 2007 .

[110]  J. Hattie,et al.  The Power of Feedback , 2007 .

[111]  D. Christie,et al.  THE ROLE OF TEACHER RESEARCH IN CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT , 2006 .

[112]  F. Korthagen,et al.  Teacher educators working on their own professional development: goals, activities and outcomes of a project for the professional development of teacher educators , 2008 .

[113]  J. Macbeath,et al.  School self‐evaluation and the role of a critical friend , 2005 .

[114]  David C. Berliner,et al.  Describing the Behavior and Documenting the Accomplishments of Expert Teachers , 2004 .

[115]  조남욱 전자/제조업의 Collaboration 전략 , 2003 .

[116]  J. Craven,et al.  Representation in Teaching: Inferences From Research of Expert and Novice Teachers , 2003 .

[117]  H. Heneman,et al.  Continuing Assessment of Teacher Reactions to a Standards-Based Teacher Evaluation System , 2003 .

[118]  N. Law,et al.  ICT implementation and school leadership: Case studies of ICT integration in teaching and learning , 2003 .

[119]  Vivienne Collinson,et al.  “I don’t have enough time” ‐ Teachers’ interpretations of time as a key to learning and school change , 2000 .

[120]  Claude M. Steele,et al.  The Mentor’s Dilemma: Providing Critical Feedback Across the Racial Divide , 1999 .

[121]  Laura R. Roehler,et al.  Scaffolding: A powerful tool in social constructivist classrooms. , 1997 .

[122]  Robert J. Crutcher,et al.  The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. , 1993 .

[123]  Jack C. Richards,et al.  Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics , 1992 .