Does Early Intervention With a Light Mobilization Program Reduce Long-Term Sick Leave for Low Back Pain?

Study Design. A controlled randomized clinical trial was performed. Objective. To investigate the effect of a light mobilization program on the duration of sick leave for patients with subacute low back pain. Summary of Background Data. Early intervention with information, diagnostics, and light mobilization may be a cost-effective method for returning patients quickly to normal activity. In this experiment, patients were referred to a low back pain clinic and given this simple and systematic program as an outpatient treatment. Methods. In this study, 457 patients sick-listed 8 to 12 weeks for low back pain, as recorded by the National Insurance Offices, were randomized into two groups: an intervention group (n = 237) and a control group (n = 220). The intervention group was examined at a spine clinic and given information and advice to stay active. The control group was not examined at the clinic, but was treated with conventional primary health care. Results. At 12-month follow-up assessment, 68.4% in the intervention group had returned to full-duty work, as compared with 56.4% in the control group. Conclusions. Early intervention with examination, information, and recommendations to stay active showed significant effects in reducing sick leave for patients with low back pain.

[1]  H. Ursin,et al.  Five‐Year Follow‐Up Study of a Controlled Clinical Trial Using Light Mobilization and an Informative Approach to Low Back Pain , 1998, Spine.

[2]  H. Ursin,et al.  Predictors for outcome of a multi‐modal cognitive behavioural treatment program for low back pain patients — a 12‐month follow‐up study , 1998, European journal of pain.

[3]  A. Nachemson,et al.  Newest knowledge of low back pain. A critical look. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  M. Palmer.  Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach , 1985 .

[5]  L. Klenerman,et al.  The Prediction of Chronicity in Patients With an Acute Attack of Low Back Pain in a General Practice Setting , 1995, Spine.

[6]  L. Leresche,et al.  Back Pain in Primary Care: Patient Characteristics, Content of Initial Visit, and Short‐Term Outcomes , 1998, Spine.

[7]  H. Flor,et al.  Efficacy of multidisciplinary pain treatment centers: a meta-analytic review , 1992, Pain.

[8]  N. Hadler,et al.  Back pain in the workplace. What you lift or how you lift matters far less than whether you lift or when. , 1997, Spine.

[9]  The High Cost of Bed Rest , 1997 .

[10]  A. Indahl,et al.  Good Prognosis for Low Back Pain When Left Untampered: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 1995, Spine.

[11]  D B Allan,et al.  An historical perspective on low back pain and disability. , 1989, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[12]  Classics From the Spine Literature Revisited: A Randomized Trial of 2 Versus 7 Days of Recommended Bed Rest for Acute Low Back Pain , 1997, Spine.

[13]  T Hansson,et al.  A longitudinal, prospective study of industrial back injury reporting. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  G. Waddell.  Low Back Pain: A Twentieth Century Health Care Enigma , 1996, Spine.

[15]  G. Waddell,et al.  1987 Volvo Award in Clinical Sciences: A New Clinical Model for the Treatment of Low-Back Pain , 1987, Spine.

[16]  R. Teasell,et al.  Functional Restoration: Returning Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain to Work‐Revolution or Fad? , 1996, Spine.

[17]  E. Volinn,et al.  Is occupational low back pain on the rise? , 1999, Spine.