Quality self-control and co-supervision mechanism of construction agent in public investment project in China

Public investment project (PIP) plays an important role in the China economy. In order to improve the project management performance of public projects, the government is searching for a scientific system to build a construction management supervision mode. This paper introduces the policy background and connotation of Agent Construction System (ACS). As a public investment construction management model, ACS, is gradually being incorporated into the legal framework, it is necessary to improve the construction agent supervision mechanism. This article analyzes the supervision mechanism of construction agent quality management under the principle of two-stage agent mode and establishes an agent quality self-control system and a government co-supervision system. These systems take the contract management as the core and the project quality objective as the guidance. These systems also consist of a two-dimensional framework of vertical self-control and horizontal supervision, which form a quality supervision mechanism. Based on Rough Set theory, the article proposes the idea of building an agent quality self-control and government co-supervision model, and illustrates it with a flow chart for building the model, which paves the way of quantitative research for the future.

[1]  Pang Li-fan Principle and Application of Multi-level and Comprehensive Fuzzy Evaluation Method for Quality of Building Engineering , 2009 .

[2]  Ahmet Öztaş,et al.  Development of quality matrix to measure the effectiveness of quality management systems in Turkish construction industry , 2007 .

[3]  Wuyi Yue,et al.  Dynamic risk management in petroleum project investment based on a variable precision rough set model , 2010 .

[4]  Sangyoon Chin,et al.  A process-based quality management information system , 2004 .

[5]  Ling Yan,et al.  Research frame for incentive mechanism of the construction Agent in government investment project: from the perspective of project governance , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[6]  Li Jinlong,et al.  The group decision-making rules based on rough sets on large scale engineering emergency☆ , 2012 .

[7]  Graham Winch,et al.  Governing the project process: a conceptual framework , 2001 .

[8]  Fang Zhi-geng Process Evaluation of Construction Project Based on Dominance Rough Set Approach , 2009 .

[9]  Yan Zhu,et al.  Credit Assessment of Contractors: A Rough Set Method , 2006 .

[10]  Donn E. Hancher,et al.  Quality-Based Prequalification of Contractors , 2002 .

[11]  Kin Keung Lai,et al.  Variable precision rough set for group decision-making: An application , 2008, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[12]  F. Ling How project managers can better control the performance of design-build projects , 2004 .

[13]  Kun Zhou,et al.  Feasibility Evaluation for Wind Power Generation Based on Rough Set Theory , 2011 .

[14]  J. Turner,et al.  Mechanisms of governance in the project-based organization:: Roles of the broker and steward , 2001 .