From Anatomical to Digital Dissection: A Historical Perspective Since Antiquity Towards the Twenty-First Century

As the oldest medical craft, anatomy remains the core and foundational field of medicine. That is why anatomy is in perpetual advancement, thanks to the technical progress in exploring the human body through computer science and biomedical research. Knowledge of the human body is the basis of medicine. Classical cadaver dissection, the standard discovery tool for centuries, is both unique and destructive of the surrounding tissues. For many years, anatomists have sought to preserve the shape of dissected organs for reference, teaching, and further inspection through different methods. Wax models make a copy of selected dissections. Vessel or duct injection with resin is another dissection-preserving technique. However, all these anatomical objects are unique in time and frozen in place. In contrast, modern Digital Anatomy aims to preserve structures from dissection in flexible ways. Then deliver the results quickly, flexibly, reproducibly, and interactively via advanced digital tools. Thus, computer-aided anatomical dissection addresses the limitations of classical dissection. Through it, experienced anatomists recognize the structures previously segmented with dedicated software to create accurate 3D models from macro or microscopic slices. Its interactivity, flexibility, and endless reusability make digital dissection a perfect tool for educational anatomy. This chapter explores the history of anatomical studies from their inception to the twenty-first century related to the remainder of the book.

[1]  Ezequiel R. Zorzal,et al.  Anatomy Studio: A tool for virtual dissection through augmented 3D reconstruction , 2019, Comput. Graph..

[2]  Daniel Simões Lopes,et al.  PIÑATA: Pinpoint insertion of intravenous needles via augmented reality training assistance , 2020, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[3]  Torsten Kuhlen,et al.  Quo Vadis CAVE: Does Immersive Visualization Still Matter? , 2014, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[4]  M. Mulligan,et al.  International anatomical terminology , 2006, Skeletal Radiology.

[5]  Mario Costa Sousa,et al.  Sketch-based modeling: A survey , 2009, Comput. Graph..

[6]  M J Ackerman,et al.  The Visible Human Project: a resource for education. , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[7]  Joaquim A. Jorge,et al.  Extending medical interfaces towards virtual reality and augmented reality , 2019, Annals of Medicine.

[8]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Effects of Immersion on Visual Analysis of Volume Data , 2013, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[9]  C. Singer,et al.  Galen on Anatomical Procedures , 1956 .

[10]  Chin-Boon Chng,et al.  In situ spatial AR surgical planning using projector-Kinect system , 2013, SoICT.

[11]  Daniel Mendes,et al.  VRRRRoom: Virtual Reality for Radiologists in the Reading Room , 2017, CHI.

[12]  Veronica Papa,et al.  Teaching Anatomy in the XXI Century: New Aspects and Pitfalls , 2013, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[13]  Daniel Medeiros,et al.  Interaction Techniques for Immersive CT Colonography: A Professional Assessment , 2018, MICCAI.

[14]  R. Diogo,et al.  Hiding in Plain Sight‐ancient Chinese anatomy , 2020, Anatomical record.

[15]  A. C. Eycleshymer,et al.  A cross-section anatomy , 1970 .

[16]  D. Wujastyk A Body Of Knowledge: The Wellcome Ayurvedic Anatomical Man And His Sanskrit Context. , 2009, Asian medicine.

[17]  Bernhard Preim,et al.  A survey of virtual human anatomy education systems , 2018, Comput. Graph..

[18]  P. Unschuld Medicine in China : a history of ideas , 1985 .