Impact of mesh and DEM resolutions in SEM simulation of 3D seismic response

This study shows that the resolution of a digital elevation model (DEM) and model mesh strongly influences 3D simulations of seismic response. Topographic heterogeneity scatters seismic waves and causes variation in seismic response (am-plification and deamplification of seismic amplitudes) at the Earth’s surface. DEM resolution influences the accuracy and detail with which the Earth’s surface can be represented and hence affects seismic simulation studies. Apart from the spatial resolution of a DEM, the mesh resolution, adopted in the creation of a 3D spectral element meshing, also changes the detailedness of surface topography. Working with high-resolution data is in most cases not possible on a regional scale because of its costliness in terms of time, money, and computation. In this study, we evaluate how low the resolution of DEM and mesh can become before the results are significantly affected. We simulated models with different combinations of DEM and mesh resolutions. The peak ground displacement (PGD) obtained from these simulations was compared with the PGD of the model with the finest mesh and DEM resolution. Our results show that any mesh or DEM resolution of 540 m or coarser will give unrealistic results. These results are valid for similar terrains as studied here and might not be directly applicable to regions with significantly different topography.

[1]  Jeroen Tromp,et al.  Three-Dimensional Simulations of Seismic-Wave Propagation in the Taipei Basin with Realistic Topography Based upon the Spectral-Element Method , 2008 .

[2]  S. T. G. Raghukanth,et al.  Ground motion estimation during 25th April 2015 Nepal earthquake , 2017, Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica.

[3]  Takashi Furumura,et al.  Scattering of high-frequency seismic waves caused by irregular surface topography and small-scale velocity inhomogeneity , 2015 .

[4]  D. Komatitsch,et al.  Introduction to the spectral element method for three-dimensional seismic wave propagation , 1999 .

[5]  D. Komatitsch,et al.  Effects of Realistic Surface Topography on Seismic Ground Motion in the Yangminshan Region of Taiwan Based Upon the Spectral-Element Method and LiDAR DTM , 2009 .

[6]  Achilleas G. Papadimitriou,et al.  Numerical evaluation of slope topography effects on seismic ground motion , 2005 .

[7]  Fabrice Hollender,et al.  Earthquake Ground Motion in the Mygdonian Basin, Greece: The E2VP Verification and Validation of 3D Numerical Simulation up to 4 Hz , 2015 .

[8]  F. Meer,et al.  Predicting topographic aggravation of seismic ground shaking by applying geospatial tools , 2008 .

[9]  P. Earle,et al.  Earthquake Casualty Models Within the USGS Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquakes for Response (PAGER) System , 2011 .

[10]  J. Seibert,et al.  Effects of DEM resolution on the calculation of topographical indices: TWI and its components , 2007 .

[11]  Guohe Huang,et al.  A study on DEM-derived primary topographic attributes for hydrologic applications: Sensitivity to elevation data resolution , 2008 .

[12]  Susan E. Hough,et al.  Localized damage caused by topographic amplification during the 2010 M 7.0 Haiti earthquake , 2010 .

[13]  Freek D. van der Meer,et al.  Impact of DEM source and resolution on topographic seismic amplification , 2011, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[14]  Craig A. Schultz,et al.  Effect of three‐dimensional topography on seismic motion , 1996 .

[15]  Jeroen Tromp,et al.  Effects of Topography on Seismic-Wave Propagation: An Example from Northern Taiwan , 2009 .

[16]  Margaret Hellweg,et al.  Directional topographic site response at Tarzana observed in aftershocks of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake: Implications for mainshock motions , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[17]  Jin Teng,et al.  Impact of DEM accuracy and resolution on topographic indices , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[18]  Stephen H. Hartzell,et al.  Initial investigation of site and topographic effects at Robinwood Ridge, California , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[19]  James Rose,et al.  Geomorphological mapping of glacial landforms from remotely sensed data : An evaluation of the principal data sources and an assessment of their quality , 2006 .

[20]  D. Rossiter,et al.  Geophysical and remote sensing-based approach to model regolith thickness in a data-sparse environment , 2011 .

[21]  Tatsuhiko Saito,et al.  Characterization of scattered seismic wavefields simulated in heterogeneous media with topography , 2010 .

[22]  Eduardo Kausel,et al.  Wave propagation and soil–structure interaction on a cliff crest during the 1999 Athens Earthquake , 2005 .