Assessment of Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling by Cardiac MRI in Patients Undergoing Repair Surgery for Severe Aortic or Mitral Regurgitation.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling after repair surgery for mitral regurgitation (MR) or aortic regurgitation (AR), aiming at determining optimal preoperative thresholds for normalization of LV volumes and function after surgery. DESIGN Observational prospective cohort study. SETTING Single-center, academic, tertiary care cardiovascular center. PARTICIPANTS Patients and volunteers. INTERVENTIONS Cardiac magnetic resonance with measurement of indexed LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDVi) and end-systolic volume (LVESVi), mass (LVmassi), and ejection fraction (LVEF) was performed preoperatively and postoperatively. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The authors included 29 patients with AR and 59 patients with MR (46 ± 12 and 56 ± 12 years, follow-up 222 ± 57 days). Both AR and MR repair resulted in a significant reduction of LV volumes and mass (respectively, delta change in LVEDVi -55 mL/m² and -43 mL/m²; in LVESVi -26 mL/m² and -10 mL/m²; and in LVmassi -24 g/m² and -12 g/m²; p < 0.001 for all). Yet despite the absence of perioperative necrosis, 7 (24%) patients with AR had persistent LV dilatation (LVEDVi >106 mL/m²) relative to controls and 16 (27%) patients with MR developed systolic LV dysfunction (LVEF <50%) postoperatively. Binary logistic regression analysis indicated preoperative LV volumes as the most accurate parameter for predicting both incomplete LV reverse remodeling in AR and LV dysfunction in MR. Receiver operating characteristic-determined thresholds were LVEDVi >155 mL/m² for AR and >129 mL/m² for MR. CONCLUSION Although both AR and MR repair allow significant reverse postoperative LV remodeling, persistent LV dilatation after AR correction and systolic LV dysfunction after MR repair are common and best predicted by increased preoperative LV volumes. This highlights the importance of considering LV volumes in the decision-making process.

[1]  S. Wolff,et al.  Use of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessing Mitral Regurgitation: Current Evidence. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  M. Penicka,et al.  Prognostic Implications of Magnetic Resonance–Derived Quantification in Asymptomatic Patients With Organic Mitral Regurgitation: Comparison With Doppler Echocardiography–Derived Integrative Approach , 2017, Circulation.

[3]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. , 2017, European heart journal.

[4]  A. Arai,et al.  Are Echocardiography and CMR Really Discordant in Mitral Regurgitation? , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[5]  B. Prendergast,et al.  Determination of Clinical Outcome in Mitral Regurgitation With Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Quantification , 2016, Circulation.

[6]  Roberto Lang,et al.  Discordance between echocardiography and MRI in the assessment of mitral regurgitation severity: a prospective multicenter trial. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Victor Mor-Avi,et al.  Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. , 2015, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[8]  James D. Thomas,et al.  Regurgitant volume informs rate of progressive cardiac dysfunction in asymptomatic patients with chronic aortic or mitral regurgitation. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[9]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Left ventricular dysfunction after mitral valve repair--the fallacy of "normal" preoperative myocardial function. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[10]  B. Gerber,et al.  Valve repair improves the outcome of surgery for chronic severe aortic regurgitation: a propensity score analysis. , 2014, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

[11]  Thoralf M Sundt,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  O. Bertrand,et al.  Predictors of left ventricular remodeling after surgical repair or replacement for pure severe mitral regurgitation caused by leaflet prolapse. , 2013, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  J. Zamorano,et al.  Recommendations for the echocardiographic assessment of native valvular regurgitation: an executive summary from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. , 2013, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[14]  J. Francis,et al.  Clinical Outcome in Aortic Regurgitation with Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance , 2012 .

[15]  T. Denney,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging With 3-Dimensional Analysis of Left Ventricular Remodeling in Isolated Mitral Regurgitation: Implications Beyond Dimensions , 2012, Circulation.

[16]  F. Dagenais,et al.  Usefulness of preoperative stroke volume as strong predictor of left ventricular remodeling and outcomes after aortic valve replacement in patients with severe pure aortic regurgitation. , 2011, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  C. Tribouilloy,et al.  Predicting left ventricular dysfunction after valve repair for mitral regurgitation due to leaflet prolapse: additive value of left ventricular end-systolic dimension to ejection fraction. , 2011, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[18]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Regression in left ventricular mass after aortic valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation is unrelated to prosthetic valve size. , 2011, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[19]  S. Wolff,et al.  Quantification of left ventricular remodeling in response to isolated aortic or mitral regurgitation , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[20]  H. Schäfers,et al.  Aortic valve repair leads to a low incidence of valve-related complications. , 2010, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[21]  Robert J Anderson,et al.  Meta-analysis of clinical outcomes following surgical mitral valve repair or replacement. , 2007, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.

[22]  A. Evangelista,et al.  Long-term outcome of surgically treated aortic regurgitation: influence of guideline adherence toward early surgery. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  S. Hosoda,et al.  Echocardiographic prediction of left ventricular dysfunction after mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation as an indicator to decide the optimal timing of repair. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Very Long-Term Survival and Durability of Mitral Valve Repair for Mitral Valve Prolapse , 2001, Circulation.

[25]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Mortality and morbidity of aortic regurgitation in clinical practice. A long-term follow-up study. , 1999, Circulation.

[26]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Mortality and Morbidity of Aortic Regurgitation in Clinical Practice , 1999 .

[27]  J B Seward,et al.  Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular remodeling: are left ventricular diameters suitable tools? , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  S. Pargaonkar,et al.  Surgical treatment of asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic mitral regurgitation. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[29]  P. Kligfield,et al.  Reversal of left ventricular dilatation, hypertrophy, and dysfunction by valve replacement in aortic regurgitation. , 1989, American heart journal.

[30]  R. Bonow,et al.  Long-term serial changes in left ventricular function and reversal of ventricular dilatation after valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation. , 1988, Circulation.

[31]  J Ross,et al.  Afterload mismatch in aortic and mitral valve disease: implications for surgical therapy. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  J. Spann,et al.  Differences in myocardial performance and load between patients with similar amounts of chronic aortic versus chronic mitral regurgitation. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[33]  E. Braunwald,et al.  End-systolic volume as a predictor of postoperative left ventricular performance in volume overload from valvular regurgitation. , 1980, The American journal of medicine.

[34]  W. Gaasch,et al.  Chronic Aortic Regurgitation: The Effect of Aortic Valve Replacement on Left Ventricular Volume, Mass and Function , 1978, Circulation.

[35]  S. Sasayama,et al.  Adaptations of the Left Ventricle to Chronic Pressure Overload , 1976, Circulation research.

[36]  W Grossman,et al.  Wall stress and patterns of hypertrophy in the human left ventricle. , 1975, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[37]  J. Ross Adaptations of the Left Ventricle to Chronic Volume Overload , 1974, Circulation research.