The effects of political news use, political discussion and authoritarian orientation on political participation: evidences from Singapore and Taiwan

This article utilizes two national representative surveys to examine the roles of political news use, political discussion, and authoritarian orientation in shaping political participation in two democratizing societies: Singapore and Taiwan. The regression findings show that in both societies, the effects of political news use and political discussion have to be conditioned on the type of political participation as well as the nature of the political system. Both mass and interpersonal communications are confirmed to positively influence contact and campaign participation, to different degrees depending upon the political system. Interaction effects between the two communication variables are seen as well. The authoritarian orientation is found to mainly interact with communication factors to shape political participation. Implications regarding communication influences on political participation in societies where authoritarianism is evident are discussed.

[1]  Albert C. Gunther,et al.  Balancing Trust in Media and Trust in Government during Political Change in Taiwan , 1994 .

[2]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Is It Talking, Thinking, or Both? A Lagged Dependent Variable Model of Discussion Effects on Political Knowledge , 2006 .

[3]  Public support for democracy in hong kong , 2005 .

[4]  S. Mandal.  Creativity in protest: Arts workers and the recasting of politics and society in Indonesia and Malaysia , 2003 .

[5]  G. Rawnsley,et al.  Political Communications in Democratic Taiwan: The Relationship Between Politicians and Journalists , 2011 .

[6]  Scott C. Flanagan,et al.  Value Change and Democratic Reform in Japan and Korea , 2000 .

[7]  B. Whitley.  Right-Wing Authoritarianism , Social Dominance Orientation , and Prejudice , 2004 .

[8]  M. Reith.  Viewing of crime drama and authoritarian aggression: An investigation of the relationship between crime viewing, fear, and aggression , 1999 .

[9]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation , 1999 .

[10]  Weiwu Zhang,et al.  Communication and Democratic Participation: A Critical Review and Synthesis , 2005 .

[11]  Janet Steele.  Professionalism Online , 2009 .

[12]  Mira Sotirovic, Jack M. McLeod.  Values, Communication Behavior, and Political Participation , 2001 .

[13]  Dana Ward,et al.  Right-Wing Authoritarianism , 1982 .

[14]  E. Rickert.  Authoritarianism and Economic Threat: Implications for Political Behavior , 1998 .

[15]  M. Oliver.  Influences of authoritarianism and portrayals of race on Caucasian viewers’ responses to reality‐based crime dramas , 1996, Communication Reports.

[16]  Mansur Lalljee,et al.  Measuring left right and libertarian- authoritarian values in the British electorate , 1996 .

[17]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Television Use and Social Capital: Testing Putnam's Time Displacement Hypothesis , 1999 .

[18]  Andrew R. Smith.  Dialogue in Agony: The Problem of Communication in Authoritarian Regimes , 2008 .

[19]  T. Ngo,et al.  The Cultural Construction of Politics in Asia , 2000 .

[20]  R. Stolzenberg,et al.  Multiple Regression Analysis , 2004 .

[21]  Ifat Maoz.  The Impact of Third-Party Communications on the Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations , 1999 .

[22]  Scott C. Flanagan,et al.  The New Politics, Culture Wars, and The Authoritarian-Libertarian Value Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies , 2003 .

[23]  V. Lo,et al.  Knowledge about the Gulf Wars , 2006 .

[24]  S. Chen.  State, media and democracy in Taiwan , 1998 .

[25]  Sidney Verba,et al.  Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparison. , 1980 .

[26]  James Curran,et al.  Media Systems and the Political Information Environment: A Cross-National Comparison , 2010 .

[27]  S. Verba,et al.  The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, An Analytic Study , 1964 .

[28]  S. Verba,et al.  The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations , 1964 .

[29]  Louis Leung,et al.  A Cross-Societal Study on the Role of the Mass Media in Political Socialization in China and Taiwan , 1998 .

[30]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Examining Differential Gains from Mass Media and their Implications for Participatory Behavior , 2002, Commun. Res..

[31]  T. Adorno.  The Authoritarian Personality , 1950 .

[32]  McColmFreedom House,et al.  Freedom in the World , 1993 .

[33]  P. H. Ang,et al.  Mass media laws and regulations in Singapore , 1998 .

[34]  T. Chang.  Reporting Public Opinion in Singapore , 1999 .

[35]  David Collier,et al.  Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research , 1997, World Politics.

[36]  Francis L. F. Lee.  The Impact of Political Discussion in a Democratizing Society , 2009, Commun. Res..

[37]  R. Gastil,et al.  Freedom in the World , 1998 .

[38]  Elihu Katz,et al.  News, Talk, Opinion, Participation: The Part Played by Conversation in Deliberative Democracy , 1999 .

[39]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics , 1996 .

[40]  R. Christie,et al.  Strength and Weakness: The Authoritarian Personality Today , 1995 .

[41]  J. Cappella,et al.  Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good , 1997 .

[42]  Market Competition and the Media Performance of Taiwan's Cable Television Industry , 2004 .

[43]  M. Ottaway.  Democracy Challenged: The Rise of Semi-Authoritarianism , 2002 .

[44]  R. Putnam.  Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America , 1995, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[45]  Zhengxu Wang.  Democratization in Confucian East Asia: Citizen Politics in China, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, and Vietnam , 2008 .

[46]  H. Xiaoming.  The press and public trust: The case of Singapore , 1996 .

[47]  M. Lessnoff.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1979 .

[48]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[49]  G. Rodan.  Transparency and Authoritarian Rule in Southeast Asia: Singapore and Malaysia , 2004 .

[50]  Howard G Lavine,et al.  Threat, Authoritarianism, and Selective Exposure to Information , 2005 .

[51]  Bruce C. Straits,et al.  BRINGING STRONG TIES BACK IN INTERPERSONAL GATEWAYS TO POLITICAL INFORMATION AND INFLUENCE , 1991 .

[52]  Chingching Chang.  Politically Mobilizing vs. Demobilizing Media: A Mediation Model , 2007 .

[53]  James Shanahan,et al.  Television and Authoritarianism: Exploring the Concept of Mainstreaming , 1998 .

[54]  J. Hottois.  The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion—Our Social Skin . By Noelle-Neumann Elisabeth. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984. Pp. xi + 184. $20.00.) , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[55]  S. Mandal,et al.  Challenging authoritarianism in Southeast Asia : comparing Indonesia and Malaysia , 2003 .

[56]  Lars Willnat,et al.  Political communication in Asia , 2009 .

[57]  Tianjian Shi,et al.  Political participation in Beijing , 1997 .

[58]  D. Winter,et al.  Authoritarianism and Attitudes toward Contemporary Social Issues , 1993 .

[59]  S. Iyengar,et al.  Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate , 1995 .

[60]  P. Norris.  Does Television Erode Social Capital? A Reply to Putnam , 1996, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[61]  Katrin Voltmer.  Mass Media and Political Communication in New Democracies , 2004 .

[62]  P. Mancini,et al.  Comparing Media Systems: Conclusion , 2004 .

[63]  G. Rawnsley.  The Media and Popular Protest in Pre-democratic Taiwan , 2000 .

[64]  Stephan Ortmann.  Politics and Change in Singapore and Hong Kong: Containing Contention , 2009 .