Informed Refusal

“Informed consent” implicitly links the transmission of information to the granting of permission on the part of patients, tissue donors, and research subjects. But what of the corollary, informed refusal? Drawing together insights from three moments of refusal, this article explores the rights and obligations of biological citizenship from the vantage point of biodefectors—those who attempt to resist technoscientific conscription. Taken together, the cases expose the limits of individual autonomy as one of the bedrocks of bioethics and suggest the need for a justice-oriented approach to science, medicine, and technology that reclaims the epistemological and political value of refusal.

[1]  Steven Epstein,et al.  The Rise of `Recruitmentology' , 2008, Social studies of science.

[2]  Ruha Benjamin.  Race for Cures: Rethinking the Racial Logics of ‘Trust’ in Biomedicine , 2014 .

[3]  G. DeFriese,et al.  The New York Times , 2020, Publishing for Libraries.

[4]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[5]  Charis Thompson,et al.  Good Science: The Ethical Choreography of Stem Cell Research , 2013 .

[6]  Roger Chennells.  Equitable Access to Human Biological Resources in Developing Countries: Benefit Sharing Without Undue Inducement , 2015 .

[7]  Robert Taylor,et al.  Religion, health and medicine in African Americans: implications for physicians. , 2005, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[8]  Haidan Chen.  People's Science: bodies and rights on the stem cell frontier , 2016 .

[9]  Thomas D. Beamish,et al.  Alliance Building across Social Movements: Bridging Difference in a Peace and Justice Coalition , 2009 .

[10]  Michael J. Montoya,et al.  BIOETHNIC CONSCRIPTION: Genes, Race, and Mexicana/o Ethnicity in Diabetes Research , 2007 .

[11]  Roger Chennells.  Undue Inducement and Coercion , 2016 .

[12]  Stefan Timmermans.  Good Science: The Ethical Choreography of Stem Cell Research by Charis Thompson (review) , 2018 .

[13]  J. Reardon,et al.  “Your DNA Is Our History” , 2012, Current Anthropology.

[14]  J. Murray-García,et al.  Cultural Humility Versus Cultural Competence: A Critical Distinction in Defining Physician Training Outcomes in Multicultural Education , 1998, Journal of health care for the poor and underserved.

[15]  Ian Whitmarsh.  Biomedical ambivalence: Asthma diagnosis, the pharmaceutical, and other contradictions in Barbados , 2008 .

[16]  Tom H. Pringle,et al.  Complete Khoisan and Bantu genomes from southern Africa , 2010, Nature.

[17]  K. Tallbear,et al.  Native American DNA: Tribal Belonging and the False Promise of Genetic Science , 2013 .

[18]  S. McGhee,et al.  Patients' attitudes to participation in clinical trials. , 1993, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[19]  J. Reardon,et al.  “ Your DNA Is Our History ” Genomics , Anthropology , and the Construction of Whiteness as Property by , 2012 .

[20]  A. Pollock.  On the Suspended Sentences of the Scott Sisters , 2015 .

[21]  W. D. Bois.  Souls of black folk , 1903 .

[22]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  Technologies of humility , 2007, Nature.

[23]  Christopher Kelty,et al.  Outlaw, hackers, victorian amateurs: diagnosing public participation in the life sciences today , 2010 .

[24]  Audra Simpson.  On Ethnographic Refusal: Indigeneity, ‘Voice’ and Colonial Citizenship , 2007 .

[25]  Paul Rabinow,et al.  Essays on the Anthropology of Reason , 1997 .

[26]  Ruha Benjamin.  Organized ambivalence: when sickle cell disease and stem cell research converge , 2011, Ethnicity & health.

[27]  T. J. Ward.  Body and Soul: The Black Panther Party and the Fight Against Medical Discrimination , 2014 .

[28]  N. Budwig,et al.  Therapeutic misconceptions: when the voices of caring and research are misconstrued as the voice of curing. , 1992, Ethics & behavior.

[29]  R. Tutton,et al.  Suspect technologies: forensic testing of asylum seekers at the UK border , 2014 .

[30]  H. Marcuse.  One Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society , 1964 .

[31]  L. Remennick.  Life Exposed: Biological Citizens After Chernobyl , 2003 .

[32]  O. Corrigan,et al.  Empty ethics: the problem with informed consent. , 2003, Sociology of health & illness.

[33]  N. King.  Defining and Describing Benefit Appropriately in Clinical Trials , 2000, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[34]  Michael G. Powell.  When Nature Goes Public: The Making and Unmaking of Bioprospecting in Mexico , 2005 .

[35]  D. Roberts.  Fatal Invention: How Science, Politics, and Big Business Re-create Race in the Twenty-First Century , 2011 .

[36]  Christopher Kelty,et al.  Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software , 2008 .