Mapping soil texture classes using field texturing, particle size distribution and local knowledge by both conventional and geostatistical methods

Summary We investigated the utility of three interpolation techniques that ignored descriptive ‘soft’ information and one that used it for mapping topsoil texture classes: re-coding of soil map units within Geographical Information Systems (GIS), Thiessen polygons, and classification of probability vectors estimated by ordinary indicator kriging and simple indicator kriging with local prior means. The results were compared with texture maps based on a classification of kriged maps of particle size distribution. The methods were applied to two distinct regions, which represent large areas in rain-fed rice ecosystems and irrigated rice ecosystems. The ‘hard’ databases for both areas contained soil information needed for mapping at regional scales (1:100 000‐1:150 000). These data were complemented with ‘soft’ information derived from farmers and soil experts (Northeast Thailand) and soil maps (Nueva Ecija, Philippines). Interpolated maps agreed with the texture map based on interpolation of particle size distribution, and field estimates of soil texture proved to be valuable surrogates for laboratory measurements of soil texture classes. The interpolation of categorical data such as soil texture classes allows for upgrading and increasing the resolution of maps in sparsely sampled regions by using simple field measurements. Validation using independent test sets showed that indicator kriging with local prior means performed best in the rain-fed lands, whereas soft information did not improve the predictions in Nueva Ecija. Local knowledge in a formalized form was valuable in Northeast Thailand and the interpolated soil texture map for this area had an accuracy and resolution to support agronomic decisions at the village scale. The poor quality of the soil map and the fact that the gradually changing variability in young alluvial soils can be modelled with fewer data explained the lower accuracy of simple indicator kriging with local prior means in Nueva Ecija. Thiessen polygons performed well in the undulating rain-fed lands but were not as reliable as indicator kriging in the gradually changing irrigated lands.

[1]  András Bárdossy,et al.  Spatial distribution of soil moisture in a small catchment. Part 1: geostatistical analysis , 1998 .

[2]  Amilcar Soares,et al.  Geostatistical estimation of multi-phase structures , 1992 .

[3]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice , 1976 .

[4]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[5]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[6]  Boucneau,et al.  Integrating properties of soil map delineations into ordinary kriging , 1998 .

[7]  E. Jolayemi,et al.  On the Measure of Agreement Between Two Raters , 1990 .

[8]  S. Bie,et al.  QUALITY CONTROL IN SOIL SURVEY , 1971 .

[9]  P. Goovaerts,et al.  Comparison of coIK, IK and mIK Performances for Modeling Conditional Probabilities of Categorical Variables , 1994 .

[10]  G. Foody Ordinal-level classification of sub-pixel tropical forest cover , 1994 .

[11]  J. Wösten,et al.  Comparing two approaches of characterizing soil map unit behavior in solute transport , 1996 .

[12]  A. Dobermann,et al.  How good is a reconnaissance soil map for agronomic purposes , 1996 .

[13]  Arnold K. Bregt,et al.  Mapping ordinal data in soil survey: a Costa Rican example , 1992 .

[14]  R. C. Palmer,et al.  A COMPARISON OF FIELD ESTIMATES AND LABORATORY ANALYSES OF THE SILT AND CLAY CONTENTS OF SOME WEST MIDLAND SOILS , 1976 .

[15]  Timothy C. Coburn,et al.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation , 2000, Technometrics.

[16]  L. Furbee,et al.  Indigenous knowledge and classification of soils in the Andes of southern Peru , 1996 .

[17]  I. Baillie,et al.  Booker tropical soil manual. , 1986 .

[18]  R. Webster,et al.  Statistical Methods in Soil and Land Resource Survey. , 1990 .

[19]  Marc Voltz,et al.  A comparison of kriging, cubic splines and classification for predicting soil properties from sample information , 1990 .

[20]  Pierre Goovaerts,et al.  Integrating soil map information in modelling the spatial variation of continuous soil properties , 1995 .

[21]  Arnold K. Bregt,et al.  The performance of spatial interpolation methods and choropleth maps to estimate properties at points: a soil survey case study. , 1996 .

[22]  Andre G. Journel,et al.  Constrained interpolation and qualitative information—The soft kriging approach , 1986 .

[23]  Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,et al.  Combining soil maps with interpolations from point observations to predict quantitative soil properties , 1992 .

[24]  Marc Voltz,et al.  Evaluating soil maps for prediction of soil water properties , 1994 .