Neural inhibition and interhemispheric connections in two-choice reaction time: a Laplacian ERP study.

In between-hand choice reaction time tasks, the motor cortex involved in the required response is activated while the motor cortex involved in the non-required response is inhibited. Such an inhibition could be implemented actively between the responses defined as possible alternatives by the task instructions or, alternatively, could passively result from some kind of "reciprocal inhibition" between the two motor cortices. The present study addressed this issue. To this end, we compared the surface Laplacian transforms of electroencephalographic (EEG) waves recorded over the contralateral and ipsilateral motor cortices in between-hand and within-hand choice conditions. The dynamics of the recorded EEG activities suggest that inhibition is implemented in a feed-forward manner between the cortical zones controlling the different response alternatives rather than between homologous motor cortical structures.

[1]  Febo Cincotti,et al.  Shall I Move My Right or My Left Hand , 2003 .

[2]  Peter Praamstra,et al.  The Neurophysiology of Response Competition: Motor Cortex Activation and Inhibition following Subliminal Response Priming , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[4]  B. Day,et al.  Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  Franck Vidal,et al.  A transcranial magnetic stimulation study of information processing in the motor cortex: relationship between the silent period and the reaction time delay. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[6]  Franck Vidal,et al.  The nature of unilateral motor commands in between-hand choice tasks as revealed by surface Laplacian estimation. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[7]  Werner Wolf,et al.  Onset Detection in Surface Electromyographic Signals: A Systematic Comparison of Methods , 2001, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[8]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  Franck Vidal,et al.  Physiological evidence for response inhibition in choice reaction time tasks , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[10]  J. Tanji,et al.  Contrasting neuronal activity in supplementary and precentral motor cortex of monkeys. I. Responses to instructions determining motor responses to forthcoming signals of different modalities. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  J. Stroop.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[12]  Febo Cincotti,et al.  Spatial enhancement of EEG data by surface Laplacian estimation: the use of magnetic resonance imaging-based head models , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  Hisae Gemba,et al.  Potential related to no-go reaction in go/no-go hand movement with discrimination between tone stimuli of different frequencies in the monkey , 1990, Brain Research.

[14]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. , 2006, Psychological review.

[16]  P. Nunez,et al.  High-resolution EEG using spline generated surface Laplacians on spherical and ellipsoidal surfaces , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  H. Asanuma,et al.  Effects of transcallosal volleys on pyramidal tract cell activity of cat. , 1962, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Olivier Bertrand,et al.  Scalp Current Density Mapping: Value and Estimation from Potential Data , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  G. Goldberg.  Supplementary motor area structure and function: Review and hypotheses , 1985, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.