Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: a problem of limited smooth muscle relaxation with inspiration.

We hypothesized that hyperresponsiveness in asthma is caused by an impairment in the ability of inspiration to stretch airway smooth muscle. If the hypothesis was correct, we reasoned that the sensitivity to inhaled methacholine in normal and asthmatic subjects should be the same if the challenge was carried out under conditions where deep inspirations were prohibited. 10 asthmatic and 10 normal subjects received increasing concentrations of inhaled methacholine under conditions where forced expirations from a normal end-tidal inspiration were performed. When no deep inspirations were allowed, the response to methacholine was similar in the normal and asthmatic subjects, compatible with the hypothesis we propose. Completely contrary to our expectations, however, was the marked responsivity to methacholine that remained in the normal subjects after deep breaths were initiated. 6 of the 10 normal subjects had > 20% reduction in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV 1) at doses of methacholine < 8 mg/ml, whereas there was < 15% reduction with 75 mg/ml during routine challenge. The ability of normal subjects to develop asthmatic responses when the modulating effects of increases in lung volume was voluntarily suppressed suggests that an intrinsic impairment of the ability of inspiration to stretch airway smooth muscle is a major feature of asthma.

[1]  R. Pellegrino,et al.  Changes in residual volume during induced bronchoconstriction in healthy and asthmatic subjects. , 1994, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[2]  P. Almenoff,et al.  Bronchial hyperresponsiveness after cervical spinal cord injury. , 1994, Chest.

[3]  B. Sundblad,et al.  Importance of the time interval between FEV1 measurements in a methacholine provocation test. , 1993, The European respiratory journal.

[4]  R. Pellegrino,et al.  Time course and calcium dependence of sustained bronchoconstriction induced by deep inhalation in asthma. , 1991, The American review of respiratory disease.

[5]  S. Gunst,et al.  Mechanical modulation of pressure-volume characteristics of contracted canine airways in vitro. , 1990, Journal of applied physiology.

[6]  A. Woolcock,et al.  Is a myogenic response involved in deep inspiration-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatics? , 1989, The American review of respiratory disease.

[7]  Macklem Pt Mechanical factors determining maximum bronchoconstriction. , 1989 .

[8]  E. Ingenito,et al.  Responsiveness, inflammation, and effects of deep breaths on obstruction in mild asthma. , 1989, Journal of applied physiology.

[9]  J. Wheatley,et al.  Reversibility of induced bronchoconstriction by deep inspiration in asthmatic and normal subjects. , 1989, The European respiratory journal.

[10]  S. Gunst,et al.  Parenchymal interdependence and airway response to methacholine in excised dog lobes. , 1988, Journal of applied physiology.

[11]  S. Gunst,et al.  Pressure-volume and length-stress relationships in canine bronchi in vitro. , 1988, Journal of applied physiology.

[12]  P. Macklem,et al.  Effects of lung volume on maximal methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in normal humans. , 1987, Journal of applied physiology.

[13]  E. Juniper,et al.  Total lung capacity does not change during methacholine-stimulated airway narrowing. , 1986, Journal of applied physiology.

[14]  Albert Miller Pulmonary function tests in clinical and occupational lung disease , 1986 .

[15]  W. R. Taylor,et al.  Effects of deep inhalation in asthma: relative airway and parenchymal hysteresis. , 1985, Journal of applied physiology.

[16]  P. Sterk,et al.  Limited bronchoconstriction to methacholine using partial flow-volume curves in nonasthmatic subjects. , 1985, The American review of respiratory disease.

[17]  K. Beck,et al.  Effect of edema and height on bronchial diameter and shape in excised dog lung. , 1984, Respiration physiology.

[18]  J. Fish,et al.  Analysis of time course and magnitude of lung inflation effects on airway tone: relation to airway reactivity. , 2015, The American review of respiratory disease.

[19]  S. Gunst Contractile force of canine airway smooth muscle during cyclical length changes. , 1983, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[20]  J. Fish,et al.  Regulation of bronchomotor tone by lung inflation in asthmatic and nonasthmatic subjects. , 1981, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[21]  F. Hoppin,et al.  Hysteresis of contracted airway smooth muscle. , 1979, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[22]  R. Hyatt,et al.  Effect of parenchymal shear modulus and lung volume on bronchial pressure-diameter behavior. , 1978, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[23]  J. Mead,et al.  Time dependence of flow-volume curves. , 1974, Journal of applied physiology.

[24]  S. Permutt,et al.  Bronchial closure with Mecholyl in excised dog lobes. , 1971, Journal of applied physiology.

[25]  J. Mead,et al.  Stress distribution in lungs: a model of pulmonary elasticity. , 1970, Journal of applied physiology.

[26]  N. Pride,et al.  Determinants of maximal expiratory flow from the lungs. , 1967, Journal of applied physiology.

[27]  N. Lapp,et al.  Some factors affecting the relationship of maximal expiratory flow to lung volume in health and disease. , 1967, Diseases of the chest.

[28]  J. Wyatt,et al.  Chronic Bronchitis, Asthma, and Pulmonary Emphysema , 1962 .

[29]  J. Nadel,et al.  Effect of a previous deep inspiration on airway resistance in man. , 1961, Journal of applied physiology.