Aversion to Ambiguity Regarding Medical Tests and Treatments: Measurement, Prevalence, and Relationship to Sociodemographic Factors

Aversion to “ambiguity”—uncertainty about the reliability, credibility, or adequacy of risk-related information—is an important problem that may influence judgments and decisions about medical interventions. Ambiguity aversion (AA) varies among individuals, however, and has been understudied in the health domain. To explore this phenomenon further, we developed a new theory-based measure of aversion to ambiguity regarding medical tests and treatments, and examined the prevalence and association of AA with sociodemographic factors. The “AA-Med” scale was developed using a large survey sample of the U.S. public (n = 4,398), and scale psychometric properties and the population distribution of AA were evaluated. The scale demonstrated acceptable reliability (α = .73) and validity as ascertained by association with respondents' interest in a hypothetical ambiguous cancer screening test. Ambiguity aversion (AA) was associated with older age, non-White race, lower education and income, and female sex. The AA-Med scale is a promising new measure, and AA is associated with several sociodemographic factors. We discuss implications of these findings and potential applications of the scale for future research.

[1]  W. Klein,et al.  Predictors of Perceived Ambiguity About Cancer Prevention Recommendations: Sociodemographic Factors and Mass Media Exposures , 2009, Health communication.

[2]  E. Maibach,et al.  Use of consumer survey data to target cessation messages to smokers through mass media. , 2008, American journal of public health.

[3]  W. Klein,et al.  Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: associations with cancer‐related perceptions and behaviours in a US population survey , 2007, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[4]  Paul K J Han,et al.  Communicating the Uncertainty of Harms and Benefits of Medical Interventions , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[5]  W. Klein,et al.  Perceived Ambiguity about Screening Mammography Recommendations: Association with Future Mammography Uptake and Perceptions , 2007, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[6]  H. Valdimarsdottir,et al.  Tolerance for uncertainty and perceived risk among women receiving uninformative BRCA1/2 test results , 2006, American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics.

[7]  G. Hancock,et al.  Understanding Consumers' Health Information Preferences Development and Validation of a Brief Screening Instrument , 2006, Journal of health communication.

[8]  D. Asch,et al.  Racial differences in attitudes toward innovative medical technology , 2006, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[9]  Paul K J Han,et al.  Perceived Ambiguity About Cancer Prevention Recommendations: Relationship to Perceptions of Cancer Preventability, Risk, and Worry , 2006, Journal of health communication.

[10]  G. Nowak,et al.  Parent attitudes toward immunizations and healthcare providers the role of information. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[11]  M. Kreuter,et al.  Awareness of mammography controversy among lower-income African American women in urban public health centers. , 2004, Journal of women's health.

[12]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Radiologist Uncertainty and the Interpretation of Screening , 2004, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[13]  Kathleenl N. Lohr,et al.  Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria , 2002, Quality of Life Research.

[14]  Nisha Gandhi,et al.  Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems. , 2004, American journal of preventive medicine.

[15]  D. Asch,et al.  Early adoption of BRCA1/2 testing: who and why. , 2003 .

[16]  D. Asch,et al.  Early adoption of BRCA1/2 testing: Who and why , 2003, Genetics in Medicine.

[17]  K. Buhr,et al.  The Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale: psychometric properties of the English version. , 2002, Behaviour research and therapy.

[18]  H. K. Cordell,et al.  The use of surveillance data and market research to promote physical activity. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[19]  William E. Pollard,et al.  USE OF CONSUMER PANEL SURVEY DATA FOR PUBLIC HEALTH COMMUNICATION PLANNING: AN EVALUATION OF SURVEY RESULTS , 2002 .

[20]  V. Greco,et al.  Coping with uncertainty: the construction and validation of a new measure , 2001 .

[21]  A. Raffle,et al.  Information about screening – is it to achieve high uptake or to ensure informed choice? , 2001, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[22]  A. Sowden,et al.  Increasing informed uptake and non‐uptake of screening: evidence from a systematic review , 2001, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[23]  R. Sorrentino,et al.  The Uncertain Mind: Individual Differences in Facing the Unknown , 2002 .

[24]  W. Viscusi,et al.  Smoking Status and Public Responses to Ambiguous Scientific Risk Evidence , 1999 .

[25]  M. Smithson,et al.  Conflict Aversion: Preference for Ambiguity vs Conflict in Sources and Evidence. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[26]  Kristine M. Kuhn.  Communicating Uncertainty: Framing Effects on Responses to Vague Probabilities☆ , 1997 .

[27]  Elizabeth B. Goldsmith,et al.  An Empirical Study of Overlap of Innovativeness , 1996 .

[28]  Kristine M. Kuhn,et al.  The Relative Importance of Probabilities, Outcomes, and Vagueness in Hazard Risk Decisions , 1996 .

[29]  A. Maxfield,et al.  Translating Health Psychology into Effective Health Communication , 1996, Journal of health psychology.

[30]  H Kunreuther,et al.  Cognitive processes and the decisions of some parents to forego pertussis vaccination for their children. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[31]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing". , 1996, Psychological review.

[32]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the concept, its measurement and applications , 1995 .

[33]  G A Chase,et al.  Measuring Physicians' Tolerance for Ambiguity and its Relationship to Their Reported Practices Regarding Genetic Testing , 1993, Medical care.

[34]  Melissa C. Brouwers,et al.  Uncertainty orientation and protection motivation theory : the role of individual differences in health compliance , 1993 .

[35]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity , 1992 .

[36]  Charles F. Hofacker,et al.  Measuring consumer innovativeness , 1991 .

[37]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Behavioral Law and Economics: Reluctance to Vaccinate: Omission Bias and Ambiguity , 1990 .

[38]  M S Gerrity,et al.  Physicians' Reactions to Uncertainty in Patient Care: A New Measure and New Insights , 1990, Medical care.

[39]  Shawn P. Curley,et al.  An empirical evaluation of descriptive models of ambiguity reactions in choice situations , 1989 .

[40]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Modeling Ambiguity in Decisions Under Uncertainty , 1988 .

[41]  S. M. Miller,et al.  Monitoring and blunting: validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Decision Making under Ambiguity , 1986 .

[43]  M. Mishel.  Adjusting the Fit: Development of Uncertainty Scales for Specific Clinical Populations , 1983, Western journal of nursing research.

[44]  M. Mishel,et al.  The Measurement of Uncertainty in Illness , 1981, Nursing research.

[45]  S. Budner.  Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. , 1962, Journal of personality.

[46]  D. Ellsberg.  Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .