Involvement of human left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in perceptual decision making is independent of response modality

Perceptual decision making typically entails the processing of sensory signals, the formation of a decision, and the planning and execution of a motor response. Although recent studies in monkeys and humans have revealed possible neural mechanisms for perceptual decision making, much less is known about how the decision is subsequently transformed into a motor action and whether or not the decision is represented at an abstract level, i.e., independently of the specific motor response. To address this issue, we used functional MRI to monitor changes in brain activity while human subjects discriminated the direction of motion in random-dot visual stimuli that varied in coherence and responded with either button presses or saccadic eye movements. We hypothesized that areas representing decision variables should respond more to high- than to low-coherence stimuli independent of the motor system used to express a decision. Four areas were found that fulfilled this condition: left posterior dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), left posterior cingulate cortex, left inferior parietal lobule, and left fusifom/parahippocampal gyrus. We previously found that, when subjects made categorical decisions about degraded face and house stimuli, left posterior DLPFC showed a greater response to high- relative to low-coherence stimuli. Furthermore, the left posterior DLPFC appears to perform a comparison of signals from sensory processing areas during perceptual decision making. These data suggest that the involvement of left posterior DLPFC in perceptual decision making transcends both task and response specificity, thereby enabling a flexible link among sensory evidence, decision, and action.

[1]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Spatial vision. , 1971, Annual review of psychology.

[2]  M. Petrides Deficits in non-spatial conditional associative learning after periarcuate lesions in the monkey , 1985, Behavioural Brain Research.

[3]  J. Movshon,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Dissociation of human mid-dorsolateral from posterior dorsolateral frontal cortex in memory processing. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of functional MRI time‐series , 1994, Human Brain Mapping.

[7]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[9]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[10]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[11]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Neural correlates of a decision in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the macaque , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  J L Lancaster,et al.  Automated Talairach Atlas labels for functional brain mapping , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[13]  Nikos K. Logothetis,et al.  Nonmonotonic noise tuning of BOLD fMRI signal to natural images in the visual cortex of the anesthetized monkey , 2001, Current Biology.

[14]  D. Wilkin,et al.  Neuron , 2001, Brain Research.

[15]  W. Newsome,et al.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  J. Gold,et al.  Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Temporal Autocorrelation in Univariate Linear Modeling of FMRI Data , 2001, NeuroImage.

[18]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[19]  Darren R Gitelman,et al.  ILAB: A program for postexperimental eye movement analysis , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[20]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  J. Gold,et al.  Banburismus and the Brain Decoding the Relationship between Sensory Stimuli, Decisions, and Reward , 2002, Neuron.

[22]  Anthony R. Dickinson,et al.  Non-spatial, motor-specific activation in posterior parietal cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[24]  R. Romo,et al.  Temporal Evolution of a Decision-Making Process in Medial Premotor Cortex , 2002, Neuron.

[25]  K. Zilles,et al.  Differential Involvement of Parietal and Precentral Regions in Movement Preparation and Motor Intention , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Microstimulation of visual cortex affects the speed of perceptual decisions , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Emilio Salinas,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Flutter Discrimination: neural codes, perception, memory and decision making , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Neural Evidence for Representation-Specific Response Selection , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  Lawrence H. Snyder,et al.  Task preparation in macaque monkeys (Macaca mulatta) , 2003, Animal Cognition.

[30]  J. Gold,et al.  The Influence of Behavioral Context on the Representation of a Perceptual Decision in Developing Oculomotor Commands , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neuroimaging Studies of Attention: From Modulation of Sensory Processing to Top-Down Control , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  G. Orban,et al.  A Higher Order Motion Region in Human Inferior Parietal Lobule Evidence from fMRI , 2003, Neuron.

[33]  R. Romo,et al.  Correlated Neuronal Discharges that Increase Coding Efficiency during Perceptual Discrimination , 2003, Neuron.

[34]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  A general mechanism for perceptual decision-making in the human brain , 2004, Nature.

[35]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[36]  R. Romo,et al.  Neuronal Correlates of a Perceptual Decision in Ventral Premotor Cortex , 2004, Neuron.

[37]  C. Pierrot-Deseilligny,et al.  Eye movement control by the cerebral cortex , 2004, Current opinion in neurology.

[38]  W. Newsome,et al.  A general mechanism for decision-making in the human brain? , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  C. Bruce,et al.  Neural circuitry of judgment and decision mechanisms , 2005, Brain Research Reviews.

[40]  R. Romo,et al.  Neuronal correlates of subjective sensory experience , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Shadlen,et al.  The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[42]  R. Andersen,et al.  Movement Intention Is Better Predicted than Attention in the Posterior Parietal Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  J. Hirsch,et al.  A Neural Representation of Categorization Uncertainty in the Human Brain , 2006, Neuron.