Industrial symbiosis and the policy instruments of sustainable consumption and production

Abstract Industrial symbioses (ISs) and eco-industrial parks (EIPs) are key concepts of industrial ecology (IE). The aim of ISs and EIPs is to minimise inefficient material and energy use by utilising local by-product and energy flows. Industrial symbioses tend to develop through spontaneous action of economic actors, for gaining of economic benefit, but these systems can be designed and promoted via policy instruments as well. A literature review showed that national programmes for eco-industrial parks can be found in different parts of the world. In the action programmes and other sustainable consumption and production (SCP) policy documents of the EU, on the other hand, industrial symbioses gain less recognition as a path to enhanced sustainable production. In this article, we consider this and also analyse how the evolution and environmental performance of an industrial symbiosis system centred on a Finnish pulp and paper mill have been affected by SCP policy instruments. With regard to the system forming the subject of the case study, and Finnish industrial systems in general, policy instruments have succeeded in reducing emissions but not in systematically encouraging operators toward symbiosis-like activities. All in all, few studies exist on the overall impact of policy instruments promoting design of eco-industrial parks. It is not self-evident that symbiosis-like production systems would be sustainable in every case, as the background assumptions for political promotion of EIPs suggest. We concluded that industrial symbioses should be analysed and developed on a life cycle basis, with documentation of the real environmental benefits due to efficient resource use and decreased emissions in comparison to standalone production. ISs can then bring eco-competitiveness to companies in relation to SCP tools, such as environmental permits, ecolabels, and future product regulation based on the Ecodesign Directive in Europe. Indirect encouragement of symbiosis through land-use regulation and planning, in such a way that material fluxes between companies are possible both in operations and in financial terms, may prove effective. The same holds for waste policies that encourage increased reuse of a company’s waste by other enterprises.

[1]  Evert Vedung,et al.  Evaluation of environmental policy instruments – a case study of the Finnish pulp & paper and chemical industries , 2002 .

[2]  W. Ashton Understanding the Organization of Industrial Ecosystems , 2008 .

[3]  Judy Kincaid,et al.  Industrial Ecosystem Development at the Metropolitan Level , 2001 .

[4]  L. Sokka,et al.  Quantifying the total environmental impacts of an industrial symbiosis - a comparison of process-, hybrid and input-output life cycle assessment. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Geraldo Lombardi,et al.  The benefits of a Brazilian agro-industrial symbiosis system and the strategies to make it happen. , 2007 .

[6]  Y. Geng,et al.  Environmental Management Systems at the Industrial Park Level in China , 2003, Environmental management.

[7]  F. Rubik,et al.  Integrated Product Policy (IPP) in Europe—a development model and some impressions , 2002 .

[8]  Magnus Karlsson,et al.  Evaluating the environmental benefits of industrial symbiosis: discussion and demonstration of a new approach , 2008 .

[9]  D. Silverman Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction , 1994 .

[10]  Han Shi,et al.  Developing country experience with eco-industrial parks: a case study of the Tianjin Economic-Technological Development Area in China , 2010 .

[11]  Andreas Koenig,et al.  Quo Vadis EIP? How Eco‐industrial Parks are Evolving , 2005 .

[12]  P. Desrochers,et al.  INDUSTRIAL SYMBIOSIS: THE CASE FOR MARKET COORDINATION , 2004 .

[13]  J. Korhonen Regional industrial ecology: examples from regional economic systems of forest industry and energy supply in Finland. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[14]  W. Vermeulen,et al.  Eco-industrial park initiatives in the USA and the Netherlands: first lessons , 2004 .

[15]  Janne Hukkinen,et al.  Beyond effectiveness: the uses of Finland’s national programme to promote sustainable consumption and production , 2011 .

[16]  Thomas Ott,et al.  The industrial region as a promising unit for eco-industrial development—reflections, practical experience and establishment of innovative instruments to support industrial ecology , 2004 .

[17]  J. Korhonen,et al.  Analysing the evolution of industrial ecosystems: concepts and application , 2005 .

[18]  Y. Geng,et al.  Assessment of the National Eco‐Industrial Park Standard for Promoting Industrial Symbiosis in China , 2009 .

[19]  Jukka Similä Pollution Regulation and Its Effects on Technological Innovations , 2002 .

[20]  Murat Mirata,et al.  Experiences from early stages of a national industrial symbiosis programme in the UK: determinants and coordination challenges , 2004 .

[21]  Han Brezet,et al.  Ecodesign : a promising approach to sustainable production and consumption , 1997 .

[22]  Jouni Korhonen,et al.  Material and energy flows of a local forest industry system in Finland , 2003 .

[23]  Olli Salmi,et al.  Eco-efficiency and industrial symbiosis – a counterfactual analysis of a mining community , 2007 .

[24]  Rong Qin,et al.  Industrial sustainability in China: practice and prospects for eco-industrial development. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[25]  D. Silverman Interpreting Qualitative Data , 1993 .

[26]  A. Wolf,et al.  Using an optimization model to evaluate the economic benefits of industrial symbiosis in the forest industry , 2008 .

[27]  M. Chertow “Uncovering” Industrial Symbiosis , 2007 .

[28]  The environmental activities of industrial park organisations in Hungary , 2008 .

[29]  Brian H. Roberts,et al.  The application of industrial ecology principles and planning guidelines for the development of eco-industrial parks: an Australian case study , 2004 .

[30]  J. W. Bruce,et al.  The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths , 2001 .

[31]  David Gibbs,et al.  Reflections on implementing industrial ecology through eco-industrial park development , 2007 .

[32]  Lei Shi,et al.  Improving enterprise competitive advantage with industrial symbiosis: case study of a smeltery in China , 2009 .

[33]  M. Chertow,et al.  Quantifying economic and environmental benefits of co-located firms. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  Raymond P. Côté,et al.  Designing eco-industrial parks: a synthesis of some experiences , 1998 .

[35]  Raimo Lilja,et al.  From waste prevention to promotion of material efficiency: change of discourse in the waste policy of Finland , 2009 .

[36]  Tsuyoshi Fujita,et al.  Industrial and urban symbiosis in Japan: analysis of the Eco-Town Program 1997-2006. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[37]  Marian Chertow,et al.  INDUSTRIAL SYMBIOSIS: Literature and Taxonomy , 2000 .

[38]  Kimmo Silvo,et al.  Implications of regulation based on the IPPC directive – A review on the Finnish pulp and paper industry , 2009 .

[39]  L. B. E. Veiga,et al.  Eco-industrial park development in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: a tool for sustainable development , 2009 .

[40]  Kent Petersson,et al.  Industrial symbiosis in the Swedish forest industry , 2007 .

[41]  Mats Söderström,et al.  Developing integration in a local industrial ecosystem : An explorative approach , 2007 .

[42]  Joshua M. Pearce,et al.  Utilization of Virtual Globes for Open Source Industrial Symbiosis , 2009 .

[43]  Ernest A. Lowe,et al.  Industrial ecology and industrial ecosystems , 1995 .

[44]  H. Nash The European Commission's sustainable consumption and production and sustainable industrial policy action plan , 2009 .

[45]  D. Gibbs Trust and Networking in Inter-firm Relations: the Case of Eco-industrial Development , 2003 .

[46]  Steven W. Peck When Is an Eco‐Industrial Park Not an Eco‐Industrial Park? , 2001 .

[47]  Tapio S. Katko,et al.  Water pollution control and strategies in Finnish pulp and paper industries in the 20th century , 2005 .

[48]  Ichiro Sakata,et al.  An analysis of geographical agglomeration and modularized industrial networks in a regional cluster: A case study at Yamagata prefecture in Japan , 2008 .

[49]  Marcus G. van Leeuwen,et al.  Planning eco-industrial parks: An analysis of Dutch planning methods , 2003 .

[50]  P. Mickwitz Is it as bad as it sounds or as good as it looks? Experiences of Finnish water discharge limits , 2003 .

[51]  Tareq Emtairah,et al.  Industrial symbiosis networks and the contribution to environmental innovation: The case of the Landskrona industrial symbiosis programme , 2005 .

[52]  E. Hertwich,et al.  CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[53]  J. Korhonen,et al.  Industrial ecosystem evolution of North Karelia heating energy system , 2003 .

[54]  Paula Kivimaa,et al.  The role of policy instruments in the innovation and diffusion of environmentally friendlier technologies: popular claims versus case study experiences , 2008 .

[55]  J. Korhonen Co-production of heat and power: an anchor tenant of a regional industrial ecosystem , 2001 .

[56]  Jouni Korhonen,et al.  Industrial ecology in the strategic sustainable development model , 2004 .

[57]  J. Ehrenfeld,et al.  Industrial Ecology in Practice: The Evolution of Interdependence at Kalundborg , 1997 .

[58]  T. Tudor,et al.  Drivers and limitations for the successful development and functioning of EIPs (eco-industrial parks): A literature review , 2007 .

[59]  Perspectives on Finland’s sustainable consumption and production policy , 2011 .

[60]  N. Jacobsen Industrial Symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: A Quantitative Assessment of Economic and Environmental Aspects , 2006 .

[61]  Laura Sokka,et al.  Industrial symbiosis contributing to more sustainable energy use – an example from the forest industry in Kymenlaakso, Finland , 2011 .

[62]  Audrey L. Mayer,et al.  Conservation implications of exporting domestic wood harvest to neighboring countries , 2006 .

[63]  Geng Yong,et al.  On the industrial ecology potential in Asian Developing Countries , 2004 .

[64]  Ari Nissinen,et al.  Sustainability and industrial symbiosis—The evolution of a Finnish forest industry complex , 2010 .

[65]  Marian Chertow,et al.  The Eco‐industrial Park Model Reconsidered , 1998 .

[66]  J. Bi,et al.  The Circular Economy: A New Development Strategy in China , 2006 .

[67]  Soo-Mi Choi,et al.  Strategies for sustainable development of industrial park in Ulsan, South Korea--from spontaneous evolution to systematic expansion of industrial symbiosis. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.