Evaluation of cytotoxicity and antimicrobial activity of Acticoat Burn Dressing for management of microbial contamination in cultured skin substitutes grafted to athymic mice.

Cultured skin substitutes (CSS) have become a useful adjunctive treatment for closure of burn wounds, but CSS are avascular and remain susceptible to microbial destruction longer than split-thickness skin grafts. Irrigation of CSS grafted to burn wounds with a topical antimicrobial solution (TAS) has been shown to promote engraftment of CSS, but TAS usage has potential limitations. Acticoat Burn Dressing (Acticoat; Westaim Biomedical, Exeter, NH) is a silver-coated barrier dressing reported to exhibit antimicrobial activity and to reduce infection in partial-thickness and full-thickness wounds. This study evaluated the cytotoxicity of Acticoat with CSS and the efficacy of Acticoat for the management of microbial contamination in CSS grafted to full-thickness wounds in athymic mice. The cytotoxicity of Acticoat was assessed in preliminary studies after 1 week of exposure to CSS during in vitro maturation or healing on wounds in athymic mice. Histologies were analyzed and cellular viability in the CSS was determined by MTT conversion on days 0, 1, and 7 of Acticoat exposure. At 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks after grafting, wounds were traced, and areas of healing CSS were calculated by image analysis. At 4 weeks, wound biopsies were evaluated and scored for engraftment of human cells. In a subsequent study, wounds were inoculated with strain SBI-N of Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 1 x 10(5) cfu/wound before the application of CSS or inoculated onto the surface of Acticoat. At 4 weeks, swab cultures were collected from the surface of CSS and scored for the presence of SBI-N. Statistical significance was accepted at the 95% confidence level (P <.05). The data show that exposure in vitro of CSS to Acticoat was cytotoxic within 1 day, but 1 week of exposure in vivo did not injure CSS or inhibit wound healing. Contaminated wounds treated with Acticoat healed similarly to control treatments, with comparable rates of engraftment, and detection of SBI-N on the surface of only one graft. No SBI-N was detected on CSS after inoculation onto the surface of Acticoat. These results suggest that Acticoat may be suitable as a protective dressing to reduce environmental contamination of CSS, if used in conjunction with additional antimicrobials to control organisms present in the wound.

[1]  M. Walker,et al.  Microbicidal properties of a silver-containing hydrofiber dressing against a variety of burn wound pathogens. , 2004, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[2]  R. Kimble,et al.  An in vitro study of the anti-microbial efficacy of a 1% silver sulphadiazine and 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate cream, 1% silver sulphadiazine cream and a silver coated dressing. , 2004, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[3]  S. Boyce,et al.  Assessment of a silver-coated barrier dressing for potential use with skin grafts on excised burns. , 2003, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[4]  A. Buret,et al.  Early healing events in a porcine model of contaminated wounds: effects of nanocrystalline silver on matrix metalloproteinases, cell apoptosis, and healing , 2002, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[5]  S. Boyce,et al.  Vitamin C regulates keratinocyte viability, epidermal barrier, and basement membrane in vitro, and reduces wound contraction after grafting of cultured skin substitutes. , 2002, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[6]  D. Greenhalgh,et al.  Cultured Skin Substitutes Reduce Donor Skin Harvesting for Closure of Excised, Full-Thickness Burns , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[7]  D. Greenhalgh,et al.  Expression of insulin-like growth factor I by cultured skin substitutes does not replace the physiologic requirement for insulin in vitro. , 2001, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[8]  D. Heimbach,et al.  Clinical Benefits and Cost Effectiveness of Acticoat as a Dressing for Donor Sites: 57. , 2001 .

[9]  S. Boyce,et al.  The 1999 clinical research award. Cultured skin substitutes combined with Integra Artificial Skin to replace native skin autograft and allograft for the closure of excised full-thickness burns. , 1999, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[10]  S. Boyce,et al.  Assessment of the potential for microbial resistance to topical use of multiple antimicrobial agents , 1999, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[11]  S. Boyce,et al.  Incubation of cultured skin substitutes in reduced humidity promotes cornification in vitro and stable engraftment in athymic mice , 1999, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[12]  R. Burrell,et al.  Comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of ACTICOAT antimicrobial barrier dressing. , 1999, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[13]  E. Tredget,et al.  A matched-pair, randomized study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Acticoat silver-coated dressing for the treatment of burn wounds. , 1998, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[14]  S. Boyce,et al.  Effective management of microbial contamination in cultured skin substitutes after grafting to athymic mice , 1997, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[15]  D. Greenhalgh,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Cultured Skin Substitutes and Native Skin Autograft for Treatment of Full‐Thickness Burns , 1995, Annals of surgery.

[16]  S. Boyce,et al.  Noncytotoxic combinations of topical antimicrobial agents for use with cultured skin substitutes , 1995, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.

[17]  S. Boyce,et al.  Cytotoxicity testing of topical antimicrobial agents on human keratinocytes and fibroblasts for cultured skin grafts. , 1995, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[18]  S. Boyce,et al.  Selection of Topical Antimicrobial Agents for Cultured Skin for Burns by Combined Assessment of Cellular Cytotoxicity and Antimicrobial Activity , 1993, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[19]  D. Greenhalgh,et al.  Skin anatomy and antigen expression after burn wound closure with composite grafts of cultured skin cells and biopolymers. , 1993, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[20]  S. Sakabu,et al.  Skin wound closure in athymic mice with cultured human cells, biopolymers, and growth factors. , 1991, Surgery.

[21]  G. Ville,et al.  Wound healing of human skin transplanted onto the nude mouse. II. An immunohistological and ultrastructural study of the epidermal basement membrane zone reconstruction and connective tissue reorganization. , 1987, Developmental biology.

[22]  J. Naglich,et al.  Experimental studies of the pathogenesis of infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa: immunization using divalent flagella preparations. , 1986, The Journal of trauma.

[23]  T. Mosmann.  Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. , 1983, Journal of immunological methods.

[24]  D. Supp,et al.  Enhanced vascularization of cultured skin substitutes genetically modified to overexpress vascular endothelial growth factor. , 2000, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[25]  S. Boyce,et al.  Cultured skin substitutes: a review. , 1996, Tissue engineering.

[26]  M. Prunieras,et al.  Wound healing of human skin transplanted onto the nude mouse. I. An immunohistological study of the reepithelialization process. , 1986, Developmental biology.