Parameter estimation of dynamic biological network models using integrated fluxes

BackgroundParameter estimation is often the bottlenecking step in biological system modeling. For ordinary differential equation (ODE) models, the challenge in this estimation has been attributed to not only the lack of parameter identifiability, but also computational issues such as finding globally optimal parameter estimates over highly multidimensional search space. Recent methods using incremental estimation approach could alleviate the computational difficulty by performing the parameter estimation one-reaction-at-a-time. However, incremental estimation strategies usually require data smoothing and are known to produce biased parameter estimates.ResultsIn this article, we presented a new parameter estimation method called integrated flux parameter estimation (IFPE). We employed the integral form of the ODE such that we could compute the integral of reaction fluxes from time-series concentration data without data smoothing. Here, we formulated the parameter estimation as a nested optimization problem. In the outer optimization, we performed a minimization of model prediction errors over parameters associated with a subset of reactions labeled as independent. The dimension of the independent reaction subset was equal to the degrees of freedom in the calculation of integrated fluxes (IF) from concentration data. We selected the independent reactions such that given their IF values, the IFs of the remaining (dependent) reactions could be uniquely determined. Meanwhile, in the inner optimization, we estimated the model parameters associated with the dependent reactions, one-reaction-at-a-time, by minimizing the dependent IF prediction errors. We demonstrated the performance of the IFPE method using two case studies: a generalized mass action model of a branched pathway and a lin-log ODE model of Lactococcus lactis glycolytic pathway.ConclusionsThe IFPE significantly outperformed standard simultaneous parameter estimation in terms of computational efficiency and scaling. In comparison to incremental parameter estimation (IPE) method, the IFPE produced parameter estimates with significantly lower bias and did not require time-series data smoothing. The advantages of IFPE over the IPE however came at the cost of a small increase in the computational time.

[1]  P. Pardalos,et al.  Handbook of global optimization , 1995 .

[2]  M. Kleerebezem,et al.  In vivo nuclear magnetic resonance studies of glycolytic kinetics in Lactococcus lactis. , 1999, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[3]  János D. Pintér,et al.  Global Optimization: Software, Test Problems, and Applications , 2002 .

[4]  J. Heijnen,et al.  Dynamic simulation and metabolic re-design of a branched pathway using linlog kinetics. , 2003, Metabolic engineering.

[5]  W. Marquardt,et al.  Incremental and simultaneous identification of reaction kinetics: methods and comparison , 2004 .

[6]  Jonas S. Almeida,et al.  Decoupling dynamical systems for pathway identification from metabolic profiles , 2004, Bioinform..

[7]  Carol S. Woodward,et al.  Enabling New Flexibility in the SUNDIALS Suite of Nonlinear and Differential/Algebraic Equation Solvers , 2020, ACM Trans. Math. Softw..

[8]  E. Voit,et al.  Regulation of glycolysis in Lactococcus lactis: an unfinished systems biological case study. , 2006, Systems biology.

[9]  Julio R. Banga,et al.  Novel metaheuristic for parameter estimation in nonlinear dynamic biological systems , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[10]  Julio R. Banga,et al.  Scatter search for chemical and bio-process optimization , 2007, J. Glob. Optim..

[11]  Eberhard O. Voit,et al.  System estimation from metabolic time-series data , 2008, Bioinform..

[12]  E. Voit,et al.  Challenges in lin-log modelling of glycolysis in Lactococcus lactis. , 2008, IET systems biology.

[13]  I. Chou,et al.  Recent developments in parameter estimation and structure identification of biochemical and genomic systems. , 2009, Mathematical biosciences.

[14]  Julio R. Banga,et al.  An evolutionary method for complex-process optimization , 2010, Comput. Oper. Res..

[15]  D. Bonvin,et al.  Extents of reaction and flow for homogeneous reaction systems with inlet and outlet streams , 2010 .

[16]  Rudiyanto Gunawan,et al.  Parameter identifiability of power-law biochemical system models. , 2010, Journal of biotechnology.

[17]  Rudiyanto Gunawan,et al.  Parameter estimation of kinetic models from metabolic profiles: two-phase dynamic decoupling method , 2011, Bioinform..

[18]  D. Bonvin,et al.  Incremental Identification of Reaction and Mass-Transfer Kinetics Using the Concept of Extents , 2011 .

[19]  Julio R. Banga,et al.  Inference of complex biological networks: distinguishability issues and optimization-based solutions , 2011, BMC Systems Biology.

[20]  Rudiyanto Gunawan,et al.  Incremental parameter estimation of kinetic metabolic network models , 2012, BMC Systems Biology.

[21]  W. Marquardt,et al.  Incremental Identification of Reaction Systems - A Comparison between Rate-based and Extent-based Approaches , 2012 .

[22]  Jacob K. White,et al.  Systematic parameter estimation in data-rich environments for cell signalling dynamics , 2013, Bioinform..

[23]  M. Jirstrand,et al.  Stochastic differential equations as a tool to regularize the parameter estimation problem for continuous time dynamical systems given discrete time measurements. , 2014, Mathematical biosciences.