A Comparison of Different Classification Techniques for Bank Direct Marketing

Classification is a data mining techniques used to predict group membership for data instance. In this paper, we present the comparison of different classification techniques in open source data mining software which consists of a decision tree methods and machine learning for a set of bank direct marketing dataset. All decision tree methods tested are J48-graft and LAD tree while machine learning tested are radial basis function network and support vector machine. The experiment results show are a bout classification sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, mean absolute error and root mean squared error. The results on bank direct marketing data also the efficiency of machine learning methods by using support vector machine is better than that of all algorithms.

[1]  Keith C. C. Chan,et al.  Market-basket analysis with principal component analysis: an exploration , 2002, IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[2]  Trilok Chand Sharma,et al.  WEKA Approach for Comparative Study of Classification Algorithm , 2013 .

[3]  W. Marsden.  I and J , 2012 .

[4]  Jooyoung Park,et al.  Universal Approximation Using Radial-Basis-Function Networks , 1991, Neural Computation.

[5]  Joydeep Ghosh,et al.  Scale-based clustering using the radial basis function network , 1996, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[6]  Cao Haiyan,et al.  Research on Association Rules Mining Based-On Ontology in E-Commerce , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing.

[7]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[8]  Vladimír Bartík.  Association based classification for relational data and its use in web mining , 2009, 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining.

[9]  R. Sumithra,et al.  Using distributed apriori association rule and classical apriori mining algorithms for grid based knowledge discovery , 2010, 2010 Second International conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies.

[10]  Alexander Kogan,et al.  Logical analysis of data – the vision of Peter L. Hammer , 2007, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[11]  Daniel Jachyra,et al.  Classification of MMPI Profiles using Decision Trees , 2011 .

[12]  Martin D. Buhmann,et al.  Radial Basis Functions: Theory and Implementations: Preface , 2003 .

[13]  Andrej Trnka,et al.  Market Basket Analysis with Data Mining methods , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Networking and Information Technology.

[14]  Thomas Reinartz,et al.  CRISP-DM 1.0: Step-by-step data mining guide , 2000 .

[15]  Xie Wen-xiu,et al.  Market Basket Analysis Based on Text Segmentation and Association Rule Mining , 2010, 2010 First International Conference on Networking and Distributed Computing.

[16]  Gary M. Weiss,et al.  Are Decision Trees Always Greener on the Open (Source) Side of the Fence? , 2009, DMIN.

[17]  Lin Yao,et al.  Improved classification based on predictive association rules , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[18]  Kevin Barraclough,et al.  I and i , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  Qiang Niu,et al.  Association Classification Based on Compactness of Rules , 2009, 2009 Second International Workshop on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.

[20]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.