Individual Differences in Reading to Summarize Expository Text: Evidence From Eye Fixation Patterns

Eye fixation patterns were used to identify reading strategies of adults as they read multiple-topic expository texts. A clustering technique distinguished 4 strategies that differed with respect to the ways in which readers reprocessed text. The processing of fast linear readers was characterized by the absence of fixations returning to previous text. Slow linear readers made lots of forward fixations and reinspected each sentence before moving to the next. The reading of nonselective reviewers was characterized by look backs to previous sentences. The distinctive feature of topic structure processors was that they paid close attention to headings. They also had the largest working-memory capacity and wrote the most accurate text summaries. Thus, qualitatively distinct reading strategies are observable among competent, adult readers.

[1]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[2]  K. Haberlandt,et al.  The episode schema in story processing , 1980 .

[3]  Karl Haberlandt,et al.  Story grammar and reading time of story constituents , 1980 .

[4]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[5]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[6]  D. Kieras Component processes in the comprehension of simple prose , 1981 .

[7]  J. Mandler,et al.  On the psychological validity of story structure , 1982 .

[8]  Wayne L. Shebilske,et al.  9 – Eye Movements and Context Effects during Reading of Extended Discourse , 1983 .

[9]  L C Morey,et al.  A Comparison of Cluster Analysis Techniques Withing a Sequential Validation Framework. , 1983, Multivariate behavioral research.

[10]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  On-line processing of the topic structure of a text ☆ , 1985 .

[11]  Asghar Iran-Nejad,et al.  Comprehension Processes and Eye Movement Patterns in the Reading of Surprise-Ending Stories. Technical Report No. 344. , 1985 .

[12]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  Effects of Number Signals on Reading and Recall. , 1986 .

[13]  Charles R. Fletcher,et al.  Strategies for the allocation of short-term memory during comprehension , 1986 .

[14]  R. F. Lorch,et al.  On-line processing of topic structure by children and adults , 1987 .

[15]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  Task effects and individual differences in on‐line processing of the topic structure of a text , 1987 .

[16]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  The Role of Working Memory in Language Comprehension , 1988 .

[17]  C. Fletcher,et al.  Causal reasoning in the comprehension of simple narrative texts , 1988 .

[18]  A C Graesser,et al.  Processing of new arguments at clause boundaries , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Flexibility in text processing: A strategy competition model , 1990 .

[20]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .

[21]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  Comprehending coherent and incoherent texts: evidence from eye movement patterns and recall performance , 1992 .

[22]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Inference during reading. , 1992, Psychological review.

[23]  R. Engle,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: a test of four hypotheses. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  R. F. Lorch,et al.  Effects of signaling topic structure on text recall , 1993 .

[25]  S. Garrod,et al.  Resolving sentences in a discourse context: How discourse representation affects language understanding. , 1994 .

[26]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements in reading: Psycholinguistic studies. , 1994 .

[27]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[28]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  Processing of Topic Shifts by Adults and Children. , 1994 .

[29]  C. Clifton,et al.  Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: implications for eye movement control. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  J Hyönä An eye movement analysis of topic-shift effect during repeated reading. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  R. F. Lorch,et al.  Effects of organizational signals on free recall of expository text , 1996 .

[32]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  K. Rayner,et al.  Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[34]  M A Klusewitz,et al.  Effects of headings and familiarity with a text on strategies for searching a text , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[35]  K. Rayner,et al.  The Effect of Clause Wrap-Up on Eye Movements during Reading , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.