Competing complexity metrics and adults' production of complex sentences

ABSTRACT The adequacy of 11 metrics for measuring linguistic complexity was evaluated by applying each metric to language samples obtained from 30 different adult speakers, aged 60–90 years. The analysis then determined how well each metric indexed age-group differences in complexity. In addition, individual differences in the complexity of adults' language were examined as a function of these complexity metrics using structural equation modeling techniques. In a follow-up study, judges listened to sentences in noise, rated their comprehensibility, and attempted to recall each sentence verbatim. Hierarchical multiple regression was used to evaluate the structural equation model, derived from the language samples, with respect to sentence comprehensibility and recall. While most of the metrics provided an adequate account of age-group and individual differences in complexity, the amount of embedding and the type of embedding proved to predict how easily sentences are understood and how accurately they are recalled.

[1]  M. Baltin,et al.  The Mental representation of grammatical relations , 1985 .

[2]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational, and Theoretical Perspectives , 1985 .

[3]  James D. McCawley,et al.  The syntactic phenomena of English , 1988 .

[4]  Susan Kemper,et al.  Imitation of complex syntactic constructions by elderly adults , 1986, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[5]  J. Pickova.  The Measurement and Appraisal of Adult Intelligence , 1959 .

[6]  Patricia M. Clancy,et al.  Processing strategies in the acquisition of relative clauses: Universal principles and language-specific realizations , 1986, Cognition.

[7]  Janet D. Fodor,et al.  The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model , 1978, Cognition.

[8]  John Limber,et al.  THE GENESIS OF COMPLEX SENTENCES , 1973 .

[9]  R S Chapman,et al.  The relation between age and mean length of utterance in morphemes. , 1981, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[11]  T. Klee,et al.  The relation between grammatical development and mean length of utterance in morphemes , 1985, Journal of Child Language.

[12]  Susan Kemper,et al.  Telling stories: The structure of adults' narratives , 1990 .

[13]  Sheldon Rosenberg,et al.  Indicators of linguistic competence in the peer group conversational behavior of mildly retarded adults , 1987, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[14]  Raymond J. Shaw,et al.  Effects of adult age on structural and operational capacities in working memory. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[15]  W. C. Watt,et al.  On two hypotheses concerning psycholinguistics , 1969 .

[16]  R. Brown.  A First Language , 1973 .

[17]  Victor H. Yngve,et al.  A model and an hypothesis for language structure , 1960 .

[18]  L. Nilsson.  Perspectives on memory research , 1979 .

[19]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Psychology of Language , 1974 .

[20]  Morton Botel,et al.  A Formula for Measuring Syntactic Complexity; A Directional Effort. , 1972 .

[21]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences , 1973 .

[22]  P. E. Morris,et al.  Practical aspects of memory : current research and issues , 1988 .

[23]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Evaluation of the role of phonological STM in the development of vocabulary in children: A longitudinal study , 1989 .

[24]  Robert C. Berwick,et al.  The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance: Language Use and Acquisition , 1986 .

[25]  Marily Ford,et al.  A method for obtaining measures of local parsing complexity throughout sentences , 1983 .

[26]  E. Zurif,et al.  Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs , 1987, Cognition.

[27]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .

[28]  Stephen Crain,et al.  Language mechanisms and reading disorder: A modular approach , 1986, Cognition.

[29]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Phonological memory deficits in language disordered children: Is there a causal connection? ☆ , 1990 .

[30]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Natural language parsing: Syntactic complexity , 1985 .

[31]  Donald Shankweilert,et al.  SYNTACTIC COMPLEXITY AND READING ACQUISITION , 1986 .

[32]  Barry K. Rosen,et al.  Syntactic Complexity , 1974, Inf. Control..

[33]  Mitchell P. Marcus,et al.  A theory of syntactic recognition for natural language , 1979 .

[34]  Susan Kemper,et al.  Aging and the loss of grammatical forms: a cross-sectional study of language performance , 1986 .

[35]  J. Hayes.  Cognition and the development of language , 1970 .

[36]  H. Scarborough.  Index of Productive Syntax , 1990, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[37]  Susan Kemper,et al.  Language, memory, and aging: Geriatric psycholinguistics: Syntactic limitations of oral and written language , 1988 .

[38]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  X Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure , 1980 .

[39]  Helen Smith Cairns,et al.  The development of grammars underlying children's interpretation of complex sentences , 1985, Cognition.

[40]  S. Kemper.  Life-span changes in syntactic complexity. , 1987, Journal of gerontology.

[41]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View , 1988 .

[42]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice and psychological theory , 1979 .

[43]  C. S. Smith,et al.  Linguistic complexity and performance , 1986, Journal of Child Language.

[44]  D. Wechsler.  The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence, 4th ed. , 1958 .

[45]  S. Kemper,et al.  Life-span changes to adults' language: Effects of memory and genre , 1989, Applied Psycholinguistics.