Smooth-pursuit eye movements elicited by first-order and second-order motion

Abstract The perception of the displacement of luminance-defined contours (i.e., first-order motion) is an important and well-examined function of the visual system. It can be explained, for example, by the operation of elementary motion detectors (EMDs), which cross-correlate the spatiotemporal luminance distribution. More recent studies using second-order motion stimuli, i.e., shifts of the distribution of features such as contrast, texture, flicker, or motion, extended classic concepts of motion perception by including nonlinear or hierarchical processing in the EMD. Smooth-pursuit eye movements can be used as a direct behavioral probe for motion processing. The ability of the visual system to extract motion signals from the spatiotemporal changes of the retinal image can be addressed by analyzing the elicited eye movements. We measured the eye movement response to moving objects defined by two different types of first-order motion and two different types of second-order motion. Our results clearly showed that the direction of smooth-pursuit eye movements was always determined by the direction of object motion. In particular, in the case of second-order motion stimuli, smooth-pursuit did not follow the retinal image motion. The latency of the initial saccades during pursuit of second-order stimuli was slightly but significantly increased, compared with the latency of saccades elicited by first-order motion. The processing of second-order motion in the peripheral visual field was less exact than the processing of first-order motion in the peripheral field. Steady state smooth-pursuit eye speed did not reflect the velocity of second-order motion as precisely as that of first-order motion, and the resulting retinal error was compensated by saccades. Interestingly, for slow second-order stimuli we observed that the eye could move faster than the target, leading to small, corrective saccades in the opposite direction to the ongoing smooth-pursuit eye movement. We conclude from our results that both visual perception and the control of smooth-pursuit eye movements have access to processing mechanisms extracting first- and second-order motion.

[1]  J M Zanker.  Second-order motion perception in the peripheral visual field. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[2]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Illusory motion in visual displays , 1984, Vision Research.

[3]  J M Zanker,et al.  Does Motion Perception Follow Weber's Law? , 1995, Perception.

[4]  J. van Santen,et al.  Elaborated Reichardt detectors. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  H. Komatsu,et al.  Relation of cortical areas MT and MST to pursuit eye movements. II. Differentiation of retinal from extraretinal inputs. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  A. Terry Bahill,et al.  Smooth pursuit eye movements in response to predictable target motions , 1983, Vision Research.

[7]  T D Albright,et al.  Form-cue invariant motion processing in primate visual cortex. , 1992, Science.

[8]  G. Sperling,et al.  Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  A. Pantle.  Immobility of some second-order stimuli in human peripheral vision. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Motion: the long and short of it. , 1989, Spatial vision.

[11]  R D Yee,et al.  Effects of an optokinetic background on pursuit eye movements. , 1983, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system , 1961 .

[13]  G. Sperling,et al.  The dimensionality of texture-defined motion: a single channel theory , 1993, Vision Research.

[14]  Robert M. Steinman,et al.  The effect of luminance on human smooth pursuit of perifoveal and foveal targets , 1978, Vision Research.

[15]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Motion defined exclusively by second-order characteristics does not evoke optokinetic nystagmus , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[16]  Harry J. Wyatt,et al.  Active and passive smooth eye movements: Effects of stimulus size and location , 1985, Vision Research.

[17]  D. Whitteridge.  Movements of the eyes R. H. S. Carpenter, Pion Ltd, London (1977), 420 pp., $27.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[18]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Perceived direction of moving two-dimensional patterns depends on duration, contrast and eccentricity , 1992, Vision Research.

[19]  H. Wilson,et al.  A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[20]  Johannes M. Zanker,et al.  Theta motion: a paradoxical stimulus to explore higher order motion extraction , 1993, Vision Research.

[21]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[22]  P. Thier,et al.  Responses of Visual‐Tracking Neurons from Cortical Area MST‐I to Visual, Eye and Head Motion , 1992, The European journal of neuroscience.

[23]  A. Derrington,et al.  Discriminating the direction of second-order motion at short stimulus durations , 1993, Vision Research.

[24]  S. Lisberger,et al.  Attention and target selection for smooth pursuit eye movements , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  S G Lisberger,et al.  Visual motion processing for the initiation of smooth-pursuit eye movements in humans. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.