CTG Analyzer: A graphical user interface for cardiotocography

Cardiotocography (CTG) is the most commonly used test for establishing the good health of the fetus during pregnancy and labor. CTG consists in the recording of fetal heart rate (FHR; bpm) and maternal uterine contractions (UC; mmHg). FHR is characterized by baseline, baseline variability, tachycardia, bradycardia, acceleration and decelerations. Instead, UC signal is characterized by presence of contractions and contractions period. Such parameters are usually evaluated by visual inspection. However, visual analysis of CTG recordings has a well-demonstrated poor reproducibility, due to the complexity of physiological phenomena affecting fetal heart rhythm and being related to clinician's experience. Computerized tools in support of clinicians represents a possible solution for improving correctness in CTG interpretation. This paper proposes CTG Analyzer as a graphical tool for automatic and objective analysis of CTG tracings. CTG Analyzer was developed under MATLAB®; it is a very intuitive and user friendly graphical user interface. FHR time series and UC signal are represented one under the other, on a grid with reference lines, as usually done for CTG reports printed on paper. Colors help identification of FHR and UC features. Automatic analysis is based on some unchangeable features definitions provided by the FIGO guidelines, and other arbitrary settings whose default values can be changed by the user. Eventually, CTG Analyzer provides a report file listing all the quantitative results of the analysis. Thus, CTG Analyzer represents a potentially useful graphical tool for automatic and objective analysis of CTG tracings.

[1]  D. Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography , 2015, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[2]  Sandro Fioretti,et al.  Clinical application of the Segmented-Beat Modulation Method for fetal ECG extraction , 2015, 2015 12th International Workshop on Intelligent Solutions in Embedded Systems (WISES).

[3]  J. Parer Handbook of Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring , 1983 .

[4]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  Internal versus external intrapartum foetal heart rate monitoring: the effect on linear and nonlinear parameters , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[5]  R. Mantel,et al.  Automated analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate in relation to fetal rest-activity states: a longitudinal study of uncomplicated pregnancies using the Sonicaid System 8000. , 1997, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[6]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Physionet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals". Circu-lation Vol , 2000 .

[7]  Alessandra Biagini,et al.  The correlation between fetal bradycardia area in the second stage of labor and acidemia at birth , 2013, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[8]  Sandro Fioretti,et al.  Relationship between deceleration areas in the second stage of labor and neonatal acidemia , 2016, 2016 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC).

[9]  L. Burattini,et al.  Noninvasive Fetal Electrocardiography: An Overview of the Signal Electrophysiological Meaning, Recording Procedures, and Processing Techniques , 2015, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[10]  D. Ayres-de- Campos,et al.  SisPorto 2.0: a program for automated analysis of cardiotocograms. , 2000, The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine.

[11]  Sandro Fioretti,et al.  Statistical baseline assessment in cardiotocography , 2017, 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[12]  João Bernardes,et al.  Comparison of fetal heart rate baseline estimation by SisPorto 2.01 and a consensus of clinicians. , 2004, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[13]  J. Curran,et al.  Fetal Heart Monitoring. , 2018, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.

[14]  Lenka Lhotská,et al.  Open access intrapartum CTG database , 2014, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[15]  M. A. Mohd. Ali,et al.  Cardiotocography Trace Pattern Evaluation Using MATLAB Program , .

[16]  Sandro Fioretti,et al.  A New Segmented-Beat Modulation Algorithm for Maternal ECG Estimation from Abdominal Recordings , 2014, mBiDA.

[17]  Kazuo Maeda,et al.  Uterine Contractions in Normal Labor Developed by a Positive Feed-backand Oscillation , 2013 .

[18]  T. Todros,et al.  Fetal heart rate tracings: observers versus computer assessment. , 1996, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.