Semantic Radicals Contribute More Than Phonetic Radicals to the Recognition of Chinese Phonograms: Behavioral and ERP Evidence in a Factorial Study

The Chinese phonograms consist of a semantic radical and a phonetic radical. The two types of radicals have different functional contributions to their host phonogram. The semantic radical typically signifies the meaning of the phonogram, while the phonetic radical usually contains a phonological clue to the phonogram’s pronunciation. However, it is still unclear how they interplay with each other when we attempt to recognize a phonogram because previous studies rarely manipulated the functionality of the two types of radicals in a single design. Using a full factorial design, the present study aimed to probe this issue by directly manipulating the functional validity of the two types of radicals in a lexical decision task with both behavioral and event-related potential (ERP) measurements. The results showed that recognition of phonograms which were related to their semantic radicals in meaning took a shorter reaction time, showed a lower error rate, and elicited a smaller P200 and a larger N400 than did recognition of those which had no semantic relation with their semantic radicals. However, the validity of phonetic radicals did not show any main effect or interaction with that of semantic radicals on either behavioral or ERP measurements. These results indicated that semantic radicals played a dominant role in the recognition of phonograms. Transparent semantic radicals, which provide valid semantic cues to phonograms, can facilitate the recognition of phonograms.

[1]  Denise H. Wu,et al.  Tracking the temporal dynamics of the processing of phonetic and semantic radicals in Chinese character recognition by MEG , 2014, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[2]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Positional Specificity of Radicals in Chinese Character Recognition , 1999 .

[3]  Gang Peng,et al.  Sub-lexical phonological and semantic processing of semantic radicals: a primed naming study , 2013 .

[4]  B. Weekes,et al.  Effects of Semantic Radicals on Chinese Character Categorization and character Decision , 2004 .

[5]  I. Su,et al.  Taking a Radical Position: Evidence for Position-Specific Radical Representations in Chinese Character Recognition Using Masked Priming ERP , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[6]  Zhang Ming,et al.  The effects of semantic radicals and phonetic radicals in Chinese phonogram recognition , 2016 .

[7]  J. Hsiao,et al.  Position of phonetic components may influence how written words are processed in the brain: Evidence from Chinese phonetic compound pronunciation , 2010, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[8]  M. Taft The Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics: Processing of characters by native Chinese readers , 2006 .

[9]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Sublexical Processing in Reading Chinese , 1999 .

[10]  Hsuan-Chich Chen,et al.  The processing of homographic morphemes in Chinese: an ERP study , 2017 .

[11]  Chia-Ying Lee,et al.  Orthographic combinability and phonological consistency effects in reading Chinese phonograms: An event-related potential study , 2009, Brain and Language.

[12]  D. Hung,et al.  The temporal signatures of semantic and phonological activations for Chinese sublexical processing: An event-related potential study , 2006, Brain Research.

[13]  Hong-Yan Bi,et al.  Orthographic neighborhood size effect in Chinese character naming: orthographic and phonological activations. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[14]  M. Taft,et al.  Submorphemic Processing in Reading Chinese , 2001 .

[15]  Yiu-Kei Tsang,et al.  ERPs reveal sub-lexical processing in Chinese character recognition , 2012, Neuroscience Letters.

[16]  Terezinha Nunes,et al.  Children's understanding of the formal and functional characteristics of written Chinese , 1998, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[17]  I. Su,et al.  An ERP study of effects of regularity and consistency in delayed naming and lexicality judgment in a logographic writing system , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[18]  L. Feldman,et al.  Semantic radicals contribute to the visual identification of Chinese characters , 1999 .

[19]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Role of Radical Awareness in the Character and Word Acquisition of Chinese Children. Technical Report No. 615. , 1995 .

[20]  M. Eimer,et al.  An ERP study on the time course of emotional face processing , 2002, Neuroreport.

[21]  Xiaolin Zhou,et al.  The nature of sublexical processing in reading Chinese characters. , 1999 .

[22]  Man-Ying Wang EXAMINING THE BIAS FOR ORTHOGRAPHIC COMPONENTS USING AN APPARENT MOTION DETECTION TASK , 2006 .

[23]  Jing Zhao,et al.  The Special Role of Higher-Frequency Neighbors at the Phonological Level: An Event-Related Potential Study of Chinese Character Naming , 2013, ISRN neuroscience.

[24]  C. Ho,et al.  A “Radical” Approach to Reading Development in Chinese: The Role of Semantic Radicals and Phonetic Radicals , 2003 .

[25]  L. Feldman,et al.  The role of component function in visual recognition of Chinese characters. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Janet Hui-wen Hsiao,et al.  Analysis of a Chinese Phonetic Compound Database: Implications for Orthographic Processing , 2006, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[27]  M. Carreiras,et al.  The role of the frequency of constituents in compound words: Evidence from Basque and Spanish , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  Charles A. P Erfetti,et al.  Reading in two writing systems: Accommodation and assimilation of the brain's reading network , 2007, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[29]  Clay Williams Emerging development of semantic and phonological routes to character decoding in Chinese as a foreign language learners , 2013 .

[30]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[31]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Chinese character decoding: a semantic bias? , 2010 .

[32]  M. Taft,et al.  The nature of the mental representation of radicals in Chinese: a priming study. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  John Xuexin Zhang,et al.  An ERP study on the time course of phonological and semantic activation in Chinese word recognition. , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[34]  D. Hung,et al.  Temporal dynamics of the consistency effect in reading Chinese: an event-related potentials study , 2007, Neuroreport.

[35]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The nature of sublexical processing in reading Chinese characters. , 1999 .