Learning for the workplace and beyond: the challenge for university-community engagement

For many years the benefits of Work-Based Learning (WBL) experiences in preparing students for work have been understood and valued. A plethora of WBL programmes have been developed and implemented in courses and institutions around the world. Studies have shown benefits of WBL to students including ease of obtaining employment, academic achievement, progression and retention, increased starting salaries, improved career progression and development of generic and professional skills. Until the last decade, the benefits of work-based learning activities to the university have generally been viewed in terms of benefits to the student with other research and curriculum development benefits as secondary effects. New models of university-community engagement acknowledge that the learning institution is doing more than prepare students for employment: it is also preparing them to be fully functioning members of the community. The workplace and perhaps the community for which we are preparing our students will be a different place from our past and present experiences. There will be less emphasis on a single lifetime career, a greater importance of lifelong learning and an increasing reliance on diverse sources of learning and knowledge, beyond the university and beyond the traditional workplace. If it is to adequately equip our students, WBL must change to meet these changing needs. This will require a change of focus at the institution level. Increasingly we will need to be implementing innovative models of WBL that reflect a changed attitude to community engagement. The challenge for the university is twofold: to develop real, effective partnerships with industry, community groups and other organisations based on appreciation of mutual benefit; and, to embrace this wider understanding of engaged scholarship with its requirement for flexibility, adaptiveness and customisation.

[1]  Elizabeth Halsey,et al.  Keeping the customer satisfied. , 1995, International journal of health care quality assurance.

[2]  Darwin V. Kysor An evaluation of the career progress and satisfaction of cooperative education/internship graduates and regular graduates at Mercyhurst College , 1994 .

[3]  C. Williams,et al.  Unshackling the Future of Work from the Ideology of Full-Employment , 1999 .

[4]  Graham J. Hooley,et al.  The future that has already happened , 2001 .

[5]  William A. Stull,et al.  Employer Benefits of, and Attitudes toward Postsecondary Cooperative Education. , 2001 .

[6]  S. Garlick Creative Regional Development: Knowledge-Based Associations Between Universities and their Places , 2003 .

[7]  S. Garlick,et al.  Compendium of Good Practice University - Regional Development Engagement Initiatives , 2003 .

[8]  P. Rowe,et al.  Effects of Cooperative Education on Student Adaptation to University. , 1993 .

[9]  M. Weisz The added value of a cooperative education program , 2001 .

[10]  Elaine Martin,et al.  Conceptions of Workplace University Education , 1998 .

[11]  Developing human potential at work , 2001 .

[12]  Lee Harvey,et al.  The Impact of Sandwich Education on the Activities of Graduates Six Months Post- Graduation , 1999 .

[13]  W. Rickard Work-based Learning in Health: Evaluating the experience of learners, community agencies and teachers , 2002 .

[14]  Penelope Curtin,et al.  Employability skills for the future , 2004 .

[15]  S. Rickard Future employment and ageism in Britain , 1999 .

[16]  Brendan Nelson,et al.  Higher education at the crossroads: an overview paper , 2002 .

[17]  Nicola Morelli,et al.  Future configurations for remote work , 1999 .

[18]  Carl E. Meacham Cooperative Education: An Answer?. , 1969 .