An ASM/ADM model interface for dynamic plant-wide simulation.

Mathematical modelling has proven to be very useful in process design, operation and optimisation. A recent trend in WWTP modelling is to include the different subunits in so-called plant-wide models rather than focusing on parts of the entire process. One example of a typical plant-wide model is the coupling of an upstream activated sludge plant (including primary settler, and secondary clarifier) to an anaerobic digester for sludge digestion. One of the key challenges when coupling these processes has been the definition of an interface between the well accepted activated sludge model (ASM1) and anaerobic digestion model (ADM1). Current characterisation and interface models have key limitations, the most critical of which is the over-use of X(c) (or lumped complex) variable as a main input to the ADM1. Over-use of X(c) does not allow for variation of degradability, carbon oxidation state or nitrogen content. In addition, achieving a target influent pH through the proper definition of the ionic system can be difficult. In this paper, we define an interface and characterisation model that maps degradable components directly to carbohydrates, proteins and lipids (and their soluble analogues), as well as organic acids, rather than using X(c). While this interface has been designed for use with the Benchmark Simulation Model No. 2 (BSM2), it is widely applicable to ADM1 input characterisation in general. We have demonstrated the model both hypothetically (BSM2), and practically on a full-scale anaerobic digester treating sewage sludge.

[1]  U Jeppsson,et al.  Benchmark simulation Model no 2 in Matlab-simulink: towards plant-wide WWTP control strategy evaluation. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[2]  W. Gujer,et al.  Mathematical model for meso- and thermophilic anaerobic sewage sludge digestion. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Irini Angelidaki,et al.  Anaerobic digestion model No. 1 (ADM1) , 2002 .

[4]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  Towards an ASM1 – ADM1 state variable interface for plant-wide wastewater treatment modeling , 2003 .

[5]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Transformers for interfacing anaerobic digestion models to pre- and post-treatment processes in a plant-wide modelling context , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[6]  J. Gossett,et al.  Anaerobic Digestion of Waste Activated Sludge , 1982 .

[7]  Peter Dold,et al.  SIMULATION FOR OPERATION AND CONTROL OF REJECT WATER TREATMENT PROCESSES , 2007 .

[8]  T. Noike,et al.  An approach for substrate mapping between ASM and ADM1 for sludge digestion. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[9]  G A Ekama,et al.  Biodegradability of activated sludge organics under anaerobic conditions. , 2007, Water research.

[10]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  Continuity-based interfacing of models for wastewater systems described by Petersen matrices. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[11]  U Jeppsson,et al.  WWTP dynamic disturbance modelling--an essential module for long-term benchmarking development. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[12]  M de Gracia,et al.  ADM1-based methodology for the characterisation of the influent sludge in anaerobic reactors. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[13]  Peter A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Continuity-based model interfacing for plant-wide simulation: a general approach. , 2006, Water research.

[14]  P A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Towards a benchmark simulation model for plant-wide control strategy performance evaluation of WWTPs. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[15]  J. B. Copp,et al.  Benchmark Simulation Model No 2: finalisation of plant layout and default control strategy. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[16]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Towards a simulation-benchmark for evaluating respirometry-based control strategies , 1997 .

[17]  P A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Benchmark simulation model no 2: general protocol and exploratory case studies. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[18]  Sylvie Gillot,et al.  The COST Simulation Benchmark: Description and Simulator Manual , 2001 .

[19]  W. Gujer,et al.  Activated sludge model No. 3 , 1995 .

[20]  R Kleerebezem,et al.  Waste characterization for implementation in ADM1. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[21]  M Ogurek,et al.  Description of nitrogen incorporation and release in ADM1. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.