A new type of anti-heave semi-submersible drilling platform

Abstract A new type of semi-submersible drilling platform is designed. The numerical simulation software is used to analyze the heave response of the new platform in the frequency domain and time domain, and the semi-submersible drilling platforms with double-floating four-column structure and heave plate structure are compared with the new platform. This paper introduces the design principles of the new platform and the theoretical basis, mathematical model and boundary conditions during correlation analysis. The numerical simulation results show that the maximum and mean values of the heave response of the new platform are significantly reduced in the frequency domain analysis compared with the double-floating four-column and the heave-plate structure platform; and the new platform has a significant increase in the natural heaving period of the new platform, which can effectively prevent the occurrence of resonance. In the mooring time domain coupling analysis, the surge, sway and roll response of the new platform is small, and the heave response is greatly reduced. In the spectral analysis, the new platform has a smaller peak response and better wave frequency characteristics. The new platform has excellent anti-heave performance, reasonable structure and feasibility, and can provide reference for the design and selection of new generation semi-submersible drilling platform.

[1]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Atmospheric metallic and arsenic pollution at an offshore drilling platform in the Bo Sea: A health risk assessment for the workers. , 2016, Journal of hazardous materials.

[2]  Linsong Song,et al.  A Field Trial of a New System Using Both Free-Standing Drilling Riser and Mid-Depth BOP in the South China Sea , 2015 .

[3]  J. Halkyard,et al.  Large Spar Drilling and Production Platforms for Deep Water Oil and Gas , 2015 .

[4]  Hui Cheng,et al.  An analytical method for predicting the fluctuation of thrust force during drilling of unidirectional carbon fiber reinforced plastics , 2015 .

[5]  Yi Li,et al.  Hydrodynamic response for flexible connectors of mobile offshore base at rough sea states , 2016 .

[6]  Bo Liu,et al.  Petrologic characteristics and genetic model of lacustrine lamellar fine-grained rock and its significance for shale oil exploration: A case study of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Malang sag, Santanghu Basin, NW China , 2015 .

[7]  Yazhou Zhu,et al.  Sensitivity of self-elevating unit leg strength to different chord space , 2015 .

[8]  Song Deng,et al.  An Optimization Method of Top Tension in Drilling Riser–Conductor System , 2016 .

[9]  Qiang Fu,et al.  Hydrodynamic performance of a novel semi-submersible platform with nonsymmetrical pontoons , 2015 .

[10]  Anil Sablok,et al.  Heave Plate Design With Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2001 .

[11]  Krzysztof J. Kaliński,et al.  Mechatronic design of strongly nonlinear systems on a basis of three wheeled mobile platform , 2014 .

[12]  Roger Skjetne,et al.  Experimental and phenomenological investigation of dynamic positioning in managed ice , 2015 .