A morphological study of galaxies in ZwCl0024+1652, a galaxy cluster at redshift z ∼ 0.4
暂无分享,去创建一个
M. S'anchez-Portal | J. Cepa | Zeleke Beyoro Amado | M. Povi'c | S. B. Tessema | 'Angel Bongiovanni | M. Cerviño | J. I. Serrano | J. Nadolny | Ana Maria P'erez Garcia | Ricardo P'erez-Martinez | I. Pintos-Castro
[1] Esteban Cristian Fernández,et al. Digitalización de los primeros volúmenes del Boletín de la Asociación Argentina de Astronomía , 2019 .
[2] R. C. Smith,et al. A catalogue of structural and morphological measurements for DES Y1 , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[3] R. P. Norris,et al. Radio Galaxy Zoo: compact and extended radio source classification with deep learning , 2018, 1801.04861.
[4] H. D. S'anchez,et al. Improving galaxy morphologies for SDSS with Deep Learning , 2017, 1711.05744.
[5] A. Aniyan,et al. Classifying Radio Galaxies with the Convolutional Neural Network , 2017, 1705.03413.
[6] C. Lintott,et al. Galaxy Zoo: morphological classifications for 120 000 galaxies in HST legacy imaging , 2016, 1610.03068.
[7] C. Lintott,et al. Galaxy Zoo: Quantitative visual morphological classifications for 48 000 galaxies from CANDELS , 2016, 1610.03070.
[8] B. Altieri,et al. Multi-wavelength landscape of the young galaxy cluster RXJ 1257.2+4738 at z = 0.866: II. Morphological properties , 2016, 1604.08850.
[9] L. Shamir,et al. A COMPUTER-GENERATED VISUAL MORPHOLOGY CATALOG OF ∼3,000,000 SDSS GALAXIES , 2016, 1602.06854.
[10] R. Nichol,et al. The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy - an overview , 2016, 1601.00329.
[11] Santiago,et al. A CATALOG OF VISUAL-LIKE MORPHOLOGIES IN THE 5 CANDELS FIELDS USING DEEP LEARNING , 2015, 1509.05429.
[12] F. Castander,et al. The impact from survey depth and resolution on the morphological classification of galaxies , 2015, 1507.05846.
[13] Sander Dieleman,et al. Rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for galaxy morphology prediction , 2015, ArXiv.
[14] F. Castander,et al. GLACE survey : OSIRIS/GTC tuneable filter Hα imaging of the rich galaxy cluster ZwCl 0024.0+1652 at z = 0.395. I. Survey presentation, TF data reduction techniques, and catalogue. , 2015, 1502.03020.
[15] K. V. Heyden,et al. Morphology parameters: substructure identification in X-ray galaxy clusters , 2014, 1411.6525.
[16] Lior Shamir,et al. Combining Human and Machine Learning for Morphological Analysis of Galaxy Images , 2014, ArXiv.
[17] O. I. Wong,et al. The green valley is a red herring: Galaxy Zoo reveals two evolutionary pathways towards quenching of star formation in early-and late-type galaxies , 2014, 1402.4814.
[18] J. Trump,et al. CANDELS VISUAL CLASSIFICATIONS: SCHEME, DATA RELEASE, AND FIRST RESULTS , 2014, 1401.2455.
[19] E. Carrasco,et al. Low X-ray luminosity galaxy clusters – II. Optical properties and morphological content at 0.18 < z < 0.70 , 2013, 1311.0788.
[20] A. Cimatti,et al. Reversal or no reversal: the evolution of the star formation rate–density relation up to z ∼ 1.6 , 2013, 1310.1398.
[21] B. Altieri,et al. Multi-wavelength landscape of the young galaxy cluster RX J1257.2+4738 at z = 0.866 - I. The infrared view , 2013, 1309.1298.
[22] C. Lintott,et al. Galaxy Zoo 2: detailed morphological classifications for 304,122 galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2013, 1308.3496.
[23] M. Moles,et al. The ALHAMBRA survey: reliable morphological catalogue of 22 051 early- and late-type galaxies , 2013, 1308.3146.
[24] P. Rosati,et al. Morphology with Light Profile Fitting of Confirmed Cluster Galaxies at z=0.84 , 2013, 1305.0826.
[25] P. Martini,et al. THE CLUSTER AND FIELD GALAXY ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS FRACTION AT z = 1–1.5: EVIDENCE FOR A REVERSAL OF THE LOCAL ANTICORRELATION BETWEEN ENVIRONMENT AND AGN FRACTION , 2013, 1302.6253.
[26] J. Newman,et al. Dependence of galaxy quenching on halo mass and distance from its centre , 2012, 1203.1625.
[27] Ignacio Trujillo,et al. Early type galaxies have been the predominant morphological class for massive galaxies since only z~1 , 2011, 1111.6993.
[28] A. Finoguenov,et al. EARLY-TYPE GALAXIES AT z = 1.3. I. THE LYNX SUPERCLUSTER: CLUSTER AND GROUPS AT z = 1.3. MORPHOLOGY AND COLOR–MAGNITUDE RELATION , 2012, 1205.1785.
[29] M. Huertas-Company,et al. AGN-host galaxy connection: morphology and colours of X-ray selected AGN at z ≤ 2 , 2012, 1202.1662.
[30] R. Barrena,et al. Environmental effects on the bright end of the galaxy luminosity function in galaxy clusters , 2012, 1201.3796.
[31] D. Elbaz,et al. GOODS-HERSCHEL AND CANDELS: THE MORPHOLOGIES OF ULTRALUMINOUS INFRARED GALAXIES AT z ∼ 2 , 2011, 1110.4057.
[32] S. Bamford,et al. The fraction of early‐type galaxies in low‐redshift groups and clusters of galaxies , 2011, 1110.6320.
[33] Puragra Guhathakurta,et al. The DEEP3 Galaxy Redshift Survey: the impact of environment on the size evolution of massive early-type galaxies at intermediate redshift , 2011, 1109.5698.
[34] Kirpal Nandra,et al. CANDELS: CONSTRAINING THE AGN–MERGER CONNECTION WITH HOST MORPHOLOGIES AT z ∼ 2 , 2011, 1109.2588.
[35] M. Moles,et al. Morphology of galaxies in the WINGS clusters , 2011, 1109.2026.
[36] J. Tinker,et al. Galaxy evolution in groups and clusters: star formation rates, red sequence fractions and the persistent bimodality , 2011, 1107.5311.
[37] Luc Simard,et al. A CATALOG OF BULGE+DISK DECOMPOSITIONS AND UPDATED PHOTOMETRY FOR 1.12 MILLION GALAXIES IN THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY , 2011, 1107.1518.
[38] H. Hildebrandt,et al. TRACING THE STAR-FORMATION–DENSITY RELATION TO z ∼ 2 , 2011, 1104.1426.
[39] Marc Huertas-Company,et al. Revisiting the Hubble sequence in the SDSS DR7 spectroscopic sample: a publicly available Bayesian automated classification , 2010, 1010.3018.
[40] M. Nonino,et al. STAR FORMATION HISTORIES IN A CLUSTER ENVIRONMENT AT z ∼ 0.84 , 2010, 1009.3986.
[41] C. Lintott,et al. Galaxy Zoo 1: data release of morphological classifications for nearly 900 000 galaxies , 2010, 1007.3265.
[42] J. Dunlop,et al. REVERSAL OF FORTUNE: CONFIRMATION OF AN INCREASING STAR FORMATION–DENSITY RELATION IN A CLUSTER AT z = 1.62 , 2010, 1005.5126.
[43] M. Huertas-Company,et al. Evolution of blue E/S0 galaxies from z ∼ 1: merger remnants or disk-rebuilding galaxies? , 2010, 1002.3076.
[44] Roberto G. Abraham,et al. A CATALOG OF DETAILED VISUAL MORPHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATIONS FOR 14,034 GALAXIES IN THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY , 2010, 1001.2401.
[45] Chien Y. Peng,et al. DETAILED DECOMPOSITION OF GALAXY IMAGES. II. BEYOND AXISYMMETRIC MODELS , 2009, 0912.0731.
[46] CNRS,et al. How was the Hubble sequence 6 Gyr ago , 2009, 0906.2805.
[47] R. Pelló,et al. Evolution of the early-type galaxy fraction in clusters since z = 0.8 , 2009, 0910.1612.
[48] S. Moran,et al. LoCuSS: THE MID-INFRARED BUTCHER–OEMLER EFFECT , 2009, 0908.3003.
[49] C. Lintott,et al. Galaxy Zoo: reproducing galaxy morphologies via machine learning★ , 2009, 0908.2033.
[50] B. Garilli,et al. The zCOSMOS redshift survey: the role of environment and stellar mass in shaping the rise of the morphology-density relation from z ~ 1 , 2009, 0906.4556.
[51] M. S'anchez-Portal,et al. OTELO SURVEY: DEEP BVRI BROADBAND PHOTOMETRY OF THE GROTH STRIP. II. OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF X-RAY EMITTERS , 2009, 0901.3483.
[52] K. Abazajian,et al. THE SEVENTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY , 2008, 0812.0649.
[53] M. Salvato,et al. A robust morphological classification of high-redshift galaxies using support vector machines on seeing limited images II. Quantifying morphological k-correction in the COSMOS field at 1 < z < 2: Ks band vs. I band , 2008, 0811.1045.
[54] T. Treu,et al. THE NATURE OF DUSTY STARBURST GALAXIES IN A RICH CLUSTER AT z = 0.4: THE PROGENITORS OF LENTICULARS? , 2008, 0809.4260.
[55] J. Kneib,et al. THE SURVIVAL OF DARK MATTER HALOS IN THE CLUSTER Cl 0024+16 , 2007, 0711.4587.
[56] F. Castander,et al. The ALHAMBRA Project: A large area multi medium-band optical and NIR photometric survey , 2008, 0806.3021.
[57] C. Lintott,et al. Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2008, 0804.4483.
[58] O. Fèvre,et al. A robust morphological classification of high-redshift galaxies using support vector machines on seeing limited images I. Method description , 2007, 0709.1359.
[59] T. Treu,et al. A Wide-Field Survey of Two z ~ 0.5 Galaxy Clusters: Identifying the Physical Processes Responsible for the Observed Transformation of Spirals into S0s , 2007, 0707.4173.
[60] M. Postman,et al. Mass Selection and the Evolution of the Morphology-Density Relation from z = 0.8 to 0 , 2007, 0707.2782.
[61] Morphological evolution of z ~ 1 galaxies from deep K-band AO imaging in the COSMOS deep field , 2007 .
[62] The Cosmic Evolution Survey (COSMOS): The Morphological Content and Environmental Dependence of the Galaxy Color-Magnitude Relation at z ~ 0.7 , 2007, astro-ph/0701483.
[63] S. Faber,et al. Radius-dependent Luminosity Evolution of Blue Galaxies in GOODS-N , 2006, astro-ph/0612362.
[64] S. J. Lilly,et al. COSMOS Morphological Classification with the Zurich Estimator of Structural Types (ZEST) and the Evolution Since z = 1 of the Luminosity Function of Early, Disk, and Irregular Galaxies* , 2006 .
[65] R. Pelló,et al. The build-up of the colour-magnitude relation in galaxy clusters since z ~ 0.8 , 2006, astro-ph/0610373.
[66] T. Treu,et al. A Wide-Field Hubble Space Telescope Survey of the Cluster Cl 0024+16 at z = 0.4. III. Spectroscopic Signatures of Environmental Evolution in Early-Type Galaxies , 2005, astro-ph/0508092.
[67] R. Bouwens,et al. The Morphology-Density Relation in z ~ 1 Clusters , 2005, astro-ph/0501224.
[68] N. Benı́tez,et al. Weak-Lensing Analysis of the z ≃ 0.8 Cluster CL 0152–1357 with the Advanced Camera for Surveys , 2004, astro-ph/0409304.
[69] T. Treu,et al. Evolution since z = 1 of the Morphology-Density Relation for Galaxies , 2004, astro-ph/0403455.
[70] J. Brinkmann,et al. The environmental dependence of the relations between stellar mass, structure, star formation and nuclear activity in galaxies , 2004, astro-ph/0402030.
[71] P. Madau,et al. A NEW NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH TO GALAXY MORPHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION , 2003, astro-ph/0311352.
[72] M. Bershady,et al. A Direct Measurement of Major Galaxy Mergers at z ≲ 3 , 2003, astro-ph/0306106.
[73] J. Kneib,et al. A Wide-Field Hubble Space Telescope Study of the Cluster Cl 0024+16 at z = 0.4. I. Morphological Distributions to 5 Mpc Radius , 2003, astro-ph/0303267.
[74] E. Bell,et al. The Optical and Near-Infrared Properties of Galaxies. I. Luminosity and Stellar Mass Functions , 2003, astro-ph/0302543.
[75] University of Toronto,et al. A New Approach to Galaxy Morphology. I. Analysis of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Early Data Release , 2003, astro-ph/0301239.
[76] N. Vogt,et al. The DEEP Groth Strip Survey. II. Hubble Space Telescope Structural Parameters of Galaxies in the Groth Strip , 2002, astro-ph/0205025.
[77] L. Ho,et al. Detailed structural decomposition of galaxy images , 2002, astro-ph/0204182.
[78] R. Nichol,et al. Galaxy colours in high-redshift, X-ray-selected clusters – I. Blue galaxy fractions in eight clusters , 2001, astro-ph/0111169.
[79] Giovanni Fasano,et al. The Evolution of the Galactic Morphological Types in Clusters , 2000 .
[80] M.Moles,et al. The evolution of the galactic morphological types in clusters , 2000, astro-ph/0005171.
[81] Anna Jangren,et al. STRUCTURAL AND PHOTOMETRIC CLASSIFICATION OF GALAXIES. I. CALIBRATION BASED ON A NEARBY GALAXY SAMPLE , 2000 .
[82] A Spectroscopic Redshift for the Cl 0024+16 Multiple Arc System: Implications for the Central Mass Distribution. , 1999, The Astrophysical journal.
[83] C. J.,et al. THE ASYMMETRY OF GALAXIES: PHYSICAL MORPHOLOGY FOR NEARBY AND HIGH-REDSHIFT GALAXIES , .
[84] Jr.,et al. Evolution since z = 0.5 of the Morphology-Density Relation for Clusters of Galaxies , 1997, astro-ph/9707232.
[85] Karl Glazebrook,et al. The morphologies of distant galaxies. II. Classifications from the Hubble Space Telescope medium deep survey , 1996 .
[86] E. Bertin,et al. SExtractor: Software for source extraction , 1996 .
[87] Francisco Valdes,et al. The Morphologies of Distant Galaxies. I. an Automated Classification System , 1994 .
[88] B. Whitmore. What determines the morphological fractions in clusters of galaxies , 1993 .
[89] A. Oemler,et al. The Evolution of galaxies in clusters. 5. A Study of populations since Z approximately equal to 0.5 , 1984 .
[90] M. Postman,et al. The morphology-density relation - The group connection , 1984 .
[91] J. B. Oke,et al. Secondary standard stars for absolute spectrophotometry , 1983 .
[92] A. Dressler. Galaxy morphology in rich clusters: Implications for the formation and evolution of galaxies , 1980 .
[93] A. Oemler,et al. Evolution of galaxies in clusters. I. ISIT photometry of Cl 0024 + 1654 and 3C 295 , 1978 .
[94] J. Sérsic. Influence of the atmospheric and instrumental dispersion on the brightness distribution in a galaxy , 1963 .
[95] I. F. Zwicky. On the Clustering of Nebulae. , 1942 .
[96] J. H. Reynolds. Nebula, Photometric measures of the nuclei of some typical spiral nebulæ , 1920 .
[97] A. L.. Spherical Trigonometry , 1902, Nature.