Emergency Logistics Planning in Natural Disasters

Logistics planning in emergency situations involves dispatching commodities (e.g., medical materials and personnel, specialised rescue equipment and rescue teams, food, etc.) to distribution centres in affected areas as soon as possible so that relief operations are accelerated. In this study, a planning model that is to be integrated into a natural disaster logistics Decision Support System is developed. The model addresses the dynamic time-dependent transportation problem that needs to be solved repetitively at given time intervals during ongoing aid delivery. The model regenerates plans incorporating new requests for aid materials, new supplies and transportation means that become available during the current planning time horizon. The plan indicates the optimal mixed pick up and delivery schedules for vehicles within the considered planning time horizon as well as the optimal quantities and types of loads picked up and delivered on these routes.In emergency logistics context, supply is available in limited quantities at the current time period and on specified future dates. Commodity demand is known with certainty at the current date, but can be forecasted for future dates. Unlike commercial environments, vehicles do not have to return to depots, because the next time the plan is re-generated, a node receiving commodities may become a depot or a former depot may have no supplies at all. As a result, there are no closed loop tours, and vehicles wait at their last stop until they receive the next order from the logistics coordination centre. Hence, dispatch orders for vehicles consist of sets of “broken” routes that are generated in response to time-dependent supply/demand.The mathematical model describes a setting that is considerably different than the conventional vehicle routing problem. In fact, the problem is a hybrid that integrates the multi-commodity network flow problem and the vehicle routing problem. In this setting, vehicles are also treated as commodities. The model is readily decomposed into two multi-commodity network flow problems, the first one being linear (for conventional commodities) and the second integer (for vehicle flows). In the solution approach, these sub-models are coupled with relaxed arc capacity constraints using Lagrangean relaxation. The convergence of the proposed algorithm is tested on small test instances as well as on an earthquake scenario of realistic size.

[1]  J. Kennington,et al.  An Effective Subgradient Procedure for Minimal Cost Multicommodity Flow Problems , 1977 .

[2]  Cynthia Barnhart,et al.  A Network-Based Primal-Dual Heuristic for the Solution of Multicommodity Network Flow Problems , 1993, Transp. Sci..

[3]  José L. Verdegay,et al.  Solving fuzzy solid transportation problems by an evolutionary algorithm based parametric approach , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  S. Mathies,et al.  A hybrid algorithm for solving network flow problems with side constraints , 1998, Comput. Oper. Res..

[5]  Marshall L. Fisher,et al.  The Lagrangian Relaxation Method for Solving Integer Programming Problems , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[6]  Celso C. Ribeiro,et al.  A Column Generation Approach to the Multiple-Depot Vehicle Scheduling Problem , 1991, Oper. Res..

[7]  Warren B. Powell,et al.  Multicommodity network flows: The impact of formulation on decomposition , 1993, Math. Program..

[8]  Jan Karel Lenstra,et al.  Towards a model and algorithm management system for vehicle routing and scheduling problems , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  Boontariga Kasemsontitum Vehicle routing with time windows and driver learning , 2006 .

[10]  Jan Karel Lenstra,et al.  A classification scheme for vehicle routing and scheduling problems , 1990 .

[11]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Using global search heuristics for the capacity vehicle routing problem , 1998, Comput. Oper. Res..

[12]  C. Barnhart Dual‐ascent methods for large‐scale multicommodity flow problems , 1993 .

[13]  Matteo Fischetti,et al.  A polyhedral approach to an integer multicommodity flow problem , 2000, Discret. Appl. Math..

[14]  M. Dror,et al.  Split delivery routing , 1990 .

[15]  A. K. Aggarwal,et al.  A heuristic solution procedure for multicommodity integer flows , 1995, Comput. Oper. Res..

[16]  M. Venkataramanan,et al.  A surrogate and Lagrangian approach to constrained network problems , 1989 .

[17]  A. Rathi,et al.  ALLOCATING RESOURCES TO SUPPORT A MULTICOMMODITY FLOW WITH TIME WINDOWS , 1992 .

[18]  James B. Orlin A Faster Strongly Polynomial Minimum Cost Flow Algorithm , 1993, Oper. Res..

[19]  Michel Gendreau,et al.  Parallel Tabu Search for Real-Time Vehicle Routing and Dispatching , 1999, Transp. Sci..

[20]  Marshall L. Fisher,et al.  A Network Flow Based Heuristic for Bulk Pickup and Delivery Routing , 1995, Transp. Sci..

[21]  John L. Gross,et al.  Implications for Earthquake Risk Reduction in the United States From the Kocaeli, Turkey, Earthquake of August 17, 1999 | NIST , 2000 .

[22]  Lawrence Bodin,et al.  Twenty Years of Routing and Scheduling , 1990, Oper. Res..

[23]  Bruce L. Golden,et al.  VEHICLE ROUTING: METHODS AND STUDIES , 1988 .

[24]  G. Gallo,et al.  A combined transportation and scheduling problem , 1997 .

[25]  Gilbert Laporte,et al.  The vehicle routing problem: An overview of exact and approximate algorithms , 1992 .

[26]  Athanasios K. Ziliaskopoulos,et al.  An intermodal optimum path algorithm for multimodal networks with dynamic arc travel times and switching delays , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Baruch Awerbuch,et al.  Multicommodity Flows: A Survey of Recent Research , 1993, ISAAC.