The impact of hearing conservation programs on incidence of noise-induced hearing loss in Canadian workers.

BACKGROUND Noise exposure remains one of the most ubiquitous of occupational hazards. Hearing conservation program legislation and the programs themselves were designed to lower risk of resulting occupational noise-induced hearing loss, but there has been no broad-based effort to assess the effectiveness of this policy. METHODS The incidence of a 10-dB standard threshold shift was examined in a group of Canadian lumber mill workers, using annual audiogram series obtained from the Workers' Compensation Board of British Columbia for the period 1979-1996 and using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS Mean cumulative noise exposure was 98.1 dB-years. The audiograms from 22,376 individuals, among whom there were 2,839 threshold shifts of 10 dB or greater (i.e., a "standard threshold shift"), were retained in multivariable analyses. After adjusting for potential confounders, continuous use of hearing protection, and initial hearing tests later in the study period, the risk for standard threshold shift was reduced by 30%. Risk increased sixfold, however, in those with the highest noise exposure. CONCLUSIONS Hearing conservation programs may be effective in reducing overall incidence of hearing loss. In the absence of noise control at source, however, highly exposed workers remain at unnecessary risk.

[1]  D. Coggon Research methods in occupational epidemiology, 2nd edition , 2004 .

[2]  M. M. McDaniel,et al.  Noise exposure and hearing conservation practices in an industry with high incidence of workers' compensation claims for hearing loss. , 2002, American journal of industrial medicine.

[3]  T. Adera,et al.  Time trends analysis of hearing loss: an alternative approach to evaluating hearing loss prevention programs. , 2000, AIHAJ : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety.

[4]  T. Adera,et al.  Use of comparison populations for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing loss prevention programs. , 2000, AIHAJ : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety.

[5]  Judith D. Goldberg,et al.  Applied Survival Analysis , 1999, Technometrics.

[6]  M J Reilly,et al.  Occupational noise-induced hearing loss surveillance in Michigan. , 1998, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[7]  W. Daniell,et al.  Occupational hearing loss in Washington state, 1984-1991: II. Morbidity and associated costs. , 1998, American journal of industrial medicine.

[8]  W. Rintelmann,et al.  Effects of pre-existing hearing loss on proposed ANSI S12.13 outcomes for characterizing hearing conservation program effectiveness: follow-up investigation. , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[9]  E. Arslan,et al.  Audiological management of noise induced hearing loss. , 1998, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[10]  Rena H. Glaser,et al.  Preventing Occupational Hearing Loss-A Practical Guide , 1997 .

[11]  T. Helfer,et al.  Should the audiometric database analysis method (draft ANSI S12.13-1991) for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs be accepted as a US national standard?. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[12]  R. Hetu,et al.  The hearing conservation paradigm and the experienced effects of occupational noise exposure , 1994 .

[13]  J C Gaydos,et al.  An epidemiologic method for assessing the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs using audiometric data. , 1993, Military medicine.

[14]  T H Simpson,et al.  Effects of audiometric threshold step size on proposed ANSI S12.13 outcomes for characterizing hearing conservation program effectiveness. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[15]  A. Donahue,et al.  Assessment of the proposed Draft American National Standard method for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs. , 1993, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[16]  David Kriebel,et al.  Research Methods in Occupational Epidemiology , 1989 .

[17]  W Melnick Evaluation of industrial hearing conservation programs: a review and analysis. , 1984, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[18]  E. B. Clark,et al.  Workers' Compensation Board of British Columbia , 1981 .