Mandating Citizen Participation in Plan Making: Six Strategic Planning Choices

Abstract In addition to requiring that local governments plan for and manage urban development, state growth management laws require that citizens be given an opportunity to participate in the local planning process. In this article, we examine the strengths and weaknesses of citizen involvement mandates and the degree to which mandates and related local planning practices have resulted in broader citizen participation in plan making. We show that mandates do indeed affect local government attention to citizen involvement and that the choices planners make in crafting citizen involvement programs do affect the resulting level of public participation. Based on these results, we make suggestions for improving the efficacy of state growth management legislation and local planning practice directed toward enhancing citizen involvement in local planning.

[1]  David R. Godschalk,et al.  A Collaborative Approach to Planning Through Urban Activities , 1966 .

[2]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[3]  J. Glass.  Citizen participation in planning: the relationship between objectives and techniques. , 1979, Journal of the American Planning Association. American Planning Association.

[4]  Edmund M. Burke.  A participatory approach to urban planning , 1979 .

[5]  Citizen Participation In American Communities : Strategies for Success, by Daniel M. Barber. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing, 1981. Paper, $9.95. Pp. 213 , 1981 .

[6]  Morris Hill,et al.  The impact of public participation on planning: the case of the Derbyshire Structure Plan , 1984 .

[7]  Desmond M. Connor.  A new ladder of citizen participation , 1988 .

[8]  P. Dreier,et al.  The rebirth of urban democracy , 1993 .

[9]  Raymond J. Burby,et al.  Plans Can Matter! The Role of Land Use Plans and State Planning Mandates in Limiting the Development of Hazardous Areas , 1994 .

[10]  P. Berke,et al.  The Influence of State Planning Mandates on Local Plan Quality , 1994 .

[11]  P. Berke.  Evaluating environmental plan quality: the case of planning for sustainable development in New Zealand , 1994 .

[12]  Douglas R. Porter,et al.  Pulling together : a planning and development consensus-building manual , 1994 .

[13]  P. Berke.  Enhancing Plan Quality: Evaluating the Role of State Planning Mandates for Natural Hazard Mitigation , 1996 .

[14]  J. Innes.  Planning Through Consensus Building: A New View of the Comprehensive Planning Ideal , 1996 .

[15]  P. Healey.  The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory and its Implications for Spatial Strategy Formation , 1996 .

[16]  M van Leusen.  A Typology of Dwelling Arrangements , 1996 .

[17]  P. May,et al.  Making Governments Plan: State Experiments in Managing Land Use , 1997 .

[18]  Peter Adler,et al.  Participating the Public: Group Process, Politics, and Planning , 1997 .

[19]  D. Day.  Citizen Participation in the Planning Process: An Essentially Contested Concept? , 1997 .

[20]  C. King,et al.  The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration , 1998 .

[21]  L. C. Plein,et al.  Organic planning: A new approach to public participation in local governance , 1998 .

[22]  Jerry Weitz,et al.  From Quiet Revolution to Smart Growth: State Growth Management Programs, 1960 to 1999 , 1999 .

[23]  Ruth Yabes,et al.  Community Participation Methods in Design and Planning , 2000 .

[24]  D. Roush.  Making collaboration work : lessons from innovation in natural resource management , 2002 .

[25]  R. Burby.  Making Plans that Matter: Citizen Involvement and Government Action , 2003 .