Finite Element Analysis of the Jaw-Teeth/Dental Implant System: A Note About Geometrical and Material Modeling

A critical comparison of several Finite Element models is presented, with reference to the analysis of the stress and strain states around a tooth or a fixed dental implant. Such an analysis, if performed on a full, three-dimensional geometry of the jaw-tooth/dental implant system, requires significant computational resources, and it is therefore often done on simplified models, whose validity can be questionable. On the other side, the use of simplified models is adequate — almost mandatory — when detailed results are needed, or when geometrical and material nonlinearities, as well as other complicating factors, are to be taken into account. The first issue addressed here is that of the correct boundary conditions to apply to simplified models in order to obtain results reasonably resembling those given by a full, three-dimensional numerical analysis. It is shown that several simplified models can give acceptable results in terms of stress distribution in the cortical bone, in the proximity of the studied tooth/implant, but that only the study of three-dimensional portions of the total jawtooth/implant system can lead to accurate enough results for stresses far from the tooth/implant or, in any case, in the trabecular bone. A second issue is that of the importance, on the stress state around a loaded tooth or fixed implant, of the presence of the surrounding teeth. It is shown that such a presence has a non-negligible influence, and that, therefore, simplified models describing isolated teeth or implants have only comparative value. Finally, some comments are given about the material properties definition, with special reference to the inclusion of the periodontal ligament into the Finite Element model. 1 Professor of Engineering Department of Nuclear Engineering, Politecnico di Milano Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32 — 20133 Milano, Italy 2 Professor of Engineering (Corresponding Author) Department of Civil Engineering, University of Brescia Via Branze, 38 — 25123 Brescia, Italy

[1]  F. Bosman,et al.  A three-dimensional, finite-element analysis of bone around dental implants in an edentulous human mandible. , 1993, Archives of oral biology.

[2]  R L Sakaguchi,et al.  Nonlinear contact analysis of preload in dental implant screws. , 1995, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[3]  W C Van Buskirk,et al.  Modeling the biomechanics of the mandible: a three-dimensional finite element study. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  S. Atluri,et al.  The meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) method , 2002 .

[5]  B Melsen,et al.  Material parameters and stress profiles within the periodontal ligament. , 1991, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[6]  G L Kinzel,et al.  Alternative materials for three endosseous implants. , 1989, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  J B Brunski,et al.  Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface. , 1992, Clinical materials.

[8]  S. Atluri,et al.  The Meshless Local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) Method: A Simple \& Less-costly Alternative to the Finite Element and Boundary Element Methods , 2002 .

[9]  C H Jooste,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible incorporating six osseointegrated implants for stress analysis of mandibular cantilever prostheses. , 1995, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[10]  B Melsen,et al.  Determination of stress levels and profiles in the periodontal ligament by means of an improved three-dimensional finite element model for various types of orthodontic and natural force systems. , 1991, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[11]  A G Hannam,et al.  Deformation of the Human Mandible During Simulated Tooth Clenching , 1994, Journal of dental research.

[12]  Francesco Genna,et al.  An interface model for the periodontal ligament. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[13]  G J PARFITT,et al.  Measurement of the Physiological Mobility of Individual Teeth in an Axial Direction , 1960, Journal of dental research.

[14]  S. Cook,et al.  The influence of the bone-implant interface stiffness on stress profiles surrounding Al2O3 and carbon dental implants , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  P H Jacobsen,et al.  Elastic modulus of the periodontal ligament. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[16]  J Middleton,et al.  The role of the periodontal ligament in bone modeling: the initial development of a time-dependent finite element model. , 1996, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[17]  F. Bosman,et al.  A comparison of three finite element models of an edentulous mandible provided with implants. , 1993, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[18]  J Middleton,et al.  A stress analysis of the periodontal ligament under various orthodontic loadings. , 1991, European journal of orthodontics.

[19]  A G Hannam,et al.  Mandibular forces during simulated tooth clenching. , 1994, Journal of orofacial pain.

[20]  E. Richter,et al.  Dental implant abutment resembling the two-phase tooth mobility. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  C J Burstone,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis for stress in the periodontal tissue by orthodontic forces. , 1987, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.