Effects of time of weaning, supplement, and sire breed of calf during the fall grazing period on cow and calf performance.

A 4-yr experiment was conducted to determine effects of protein supplementation, age at weaning, and calf sire breed on cow and calf performance during fall grazing. Each year 48 pregnant, crossbred cows nursing steer calves (mean calving date = April 8) were assigned to a 2 x 2 x 2 factorial experiment replicated in three native range pastures. Treatment factors were: 1) no supplement (NS) or an individually fed supplement (S, 3 kg of a 34% protein supplement fed to cows every 3rd d); 2) calves weaned at the beginning (W, mid to late September) or at the end (NW, mid to late December) of the trial each year; or 3) calves sired by Hereford or Charolais bulls. Data were adjusted for cow size (initial hip height and initial and final weights and condition scores) by analyses of covariance using principal component coefficients as covariates. Change in cow weight and condition score were increased by S and W (P < .01), but these responses interacted and were not the same each year (yr x S, year x W, and year x S x W, P < .01). Forage intake was decreased (P < .1) by S and W. Total intake (forage+supplement) was not affected by S but was decreased by W (P < .1). Digestibility of OM was decreased by S (P < .01). Some carryover effects of treatments were observed the next spring in cow weight, condition score, and birth weight (NW decreased birth weight by 2 kg, P < .01), but there were no effects by the next fall on weaning weights or pregnancy rates. Milk yield decreased during the experimental period, and S maintained higher milk production in late lactation (P < .01). Calf ADG was increased by S and Charolais sires (P < .01). Efficiency (grams of output/ megacalorie of input) was not affected by sire breed but was enhanced by S (P < .01). Our conclusions are that 1) effects of feeding a 34% protein supplement to cows were to increase calf gains and improve persistency of lactation and efficiency; 2) delaying weaning decreased cow weight and condition score; 3) effects of weaning age and protein supplementation were highly dependent on forage and environmental conditions in any given year; and 4) whatever effects existed in a given year did not carry over to effects on next year's production as measured by pregnancy rates and weaning weights.

[1]  W. Stroup,et al.  Range or meadow regrowth and weaning effects on 2-year-old cows. , 1997 .

[2]  T. Klopfenstein,et al.  Supplement and forage effects on fecal output estimates from an intra-ruminal marker device. , 1995 .

[3]  D. Adams,et al.  Extended grazing systems for improving economic returns from Nebraska sandhills cow/calf operations , 1994 .

[4]  M. Borman,et al.  Effects of mechanical treatments and climatic factors on the productivity of Northern Great Plains rangelands. , 1993 .

[5]  B. Knapp,et al.  Selection for postweaning growth in inbred Hereford cattle: the Fort Keogh, Montana line 1 example. , 1992, Journal of animal science.

[6]  D. Adams,et al.  Surgical establishment of esophageal fistulae in suckling calves. , 1991 .

[7]  M. Borman,et al.  Estimation of fecal output with an intra-ruminal continuous release marker device. , 1991 .

[8]  R. Randel Nutrition and postpartum rebreeding in cattle. , 1990, Journal of animal science.

[9]  W. L. Reynolds,et al.  Biological type effects on gestation length, calving traits and calf growth rate. , 1990, Journal of Animal Science.

[10]  R. Short,et al.  Physiological mechanisms controlling anestrus and infertility in postpartum beef cattle. , 1990, Journal of animal science.

[11]  D. Sanson,et al.  Intake and digestion of low-quality meadow hay by steers and performance of cows on native range when fed protein supplements containing various levels of corn. , 1990, Journal of animal science.

[12]  C. Dinkel THE INTERACTION OF COW SIZE WITH GROWTH POTENTIAL OF THE SERVICE SIRE , 1988 .

[13]  D. Adams,et al.  Body size and body condition effects on performance and behavior of grazing beef cows , 1987 .

[14]  J. D. Wallace,et al.  Predicting Digestibility of Different Diets with Internal Markers: Evaluation of Four Potential Markers , 1986 .

[15]  D. Adams,et al.  Winter Grazing Activity and Forage Intake of Range Cows in the Northern Great Plains , 1986 .

[16]  M. W. Richards,et al.  Effect of Varying Levels of Postpartum Nutrition and Body Condition at Calving on Subsequent Reproductive Performance in Beef Cattle , 1986 .

[17]  R. Koch Ed.: S. Williams: Official Methods of Analysis. 14. Auflage, Arlington, Va., Publ. Assoc. Official Analytical Chemists, INC, 1984, 1141 S., US $ 151.50 , 1986 .

[18]  R. M. Koch,et al.  Genetic Diversity Among Cattle Breeds and Its Use to Increase Beef Production Efficiency in a Temperate Environment , 1986 .

[19]  R. J. Kartchner Effects of protein and energy supplementation of cows grazing native winter range forage on intake and digestibility. , 1980 .

[20]  W. Horwitz Official Methods of Analysis , 1980 .

[21]  J. M. Barker,et al.  Milk-fed calves: 1. The effect of milk intake upon the herbage intake and performance of grazing calves , 1976, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[22]  L. Rittenhouse,et al.  Estimating digestible energy from digestible dry and organic matter in diets of grazing cattle. , 1971 .

[23]  L. Rittenhouse,et al.  Intake and Digestibility of Winter-Range Forage by Cattle with and without Supplements , 1970 .

[24]  G. Dickerson Efficiency of animal production-molding the biological components. , 1970 .

[25]  C. Williams,et al.  The determination of chromic oxide in faeces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry , 1962, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[26]  W. Black,et al.  Factors influencing rate of gain of beef calves daring the suckling period. , 1941 .