Dynamic Approach to Space and Habitat Use Based on Biased Random Bridges

Background Although habitat use reflects a dynamic process, most studies assess habitat use statically as if an animal's successively recorded locations reflected a point rather than a movement process. By relying on the activity time between successive locations instead of the local density of individual locations, movement-based methods can substantially improve the biological relevance of utilization distribution (UD) estimates (i.e. the relative frequencies with which an animal uses the various areas of its home range, HR). One such method rests on Brownian bridges (BBs). Its theoretical foundation (purely and constantly diffusive movements) is paradoxically inconsistent with both HR settlement and habitat selection. An alternative involves movement-based kernel density estimation (MKDE) through location interpolation, which may be applied to various movement behaviours but lacks a sound theoretical basis. Methodology/Principal Findings I introduce the concept of a biased random (advective-diffusive) bridge (BRB) and show that the MKDE method is a practical means to estimate UDs based on simplified (isotropically diffusive) BRBs. The equation governing BRBs is constrained by the maximum delay between successive relocations warranting constant within-bridge advection (allowed to vary between bridges) but remains otherwise similar to the BB equation. Despite its theoretical inconsistencies, the BB method can therefore be applied to animals that regularly reorientate within their HRs and adapt their movements to the habitats crossed, provided that they were relocated with a high enough frequency. Conclusions/Significance Biased random walks can approximate various movement types at short times from a given relocation. Their simplified form constitutes an effective trade-off between too simple, unrealistic movement models, such as Brownian motion, and more sophisticated and realistic ones, such as biased correlated random walks (BCRWs), which are too complex to yield functional bridges. Relying on simplified BRBs proves to be the most reliable and easily usable way to estimate UDs from serially correlated relocations and raw activity information.

[1]  Norman A. Slade,et al.  Influence of sampling interval on estimates of home-range size , 1985 .

[2]  Norman A. Slade,et al.  Testing For Independence of Observations in Animal Movements , 1985 .

[3]  P. J. Green,et al.  Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , 1987 .

[4]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  An olfactory orientation model for mammals' movements in their home ranges , 1989 .

[5]  B. Worton Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies , 1989 .

[6]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  Spatial memory and searching efficiency , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  Paul G. Blackwell,et al.  Random diffusion models for animal movement , 1997 .

[8]  Gary C. White,et al.  Autocorrelation of location estimates and the analysis of radiotracking data , 1999 .

[9]  R. Bonduriansky,et al.  Eliminating autocorrelation reduces biological relevance of home range estimates , 1999 .

[10]  Orientation and Navigation , 2001 .

[11]  Jason Matthiopoulos,et al.  The use of space by animals as a function of accessibility and preference , 2003 .

[12]  Juan M. Morales,et al.  EXTRACTING MORE OUT OF RELOCATION DATA: BUILDING MOVEMENT MODELS AS MIXTURES OF RANDOM WALKS , 2004 .

[13]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  HABITAT-SPECIFIC MOVEMENT PARAMETERS ESTIMATED USING MARK–RECAPTURE DATA AND A DIFFUSION MODEL , 2004 .

[14]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  Detecting an orientation component in animal paths when the preferred direction is individual-dependent. , 2006, Ecology.

[15]  DANA L. THOMAS,et al.  Study Designs and Tests for Comparing Resource Use and Availability II , 2006 .

[16]  Clément Calenge,et al.  The package “adehabitat” for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals , 2006 .

[17]  Robert A. Gitzen,et al.  Analysis of Resource Selection Using Utilization Distributions , 2006 .

[18]  Paul R Moorcroft,et al.  Mechanistic home range models capture spatial patterns and dynamics of coyote territories in Yellowstone , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Jon S. Horne,et al.  Likelihood Cross-Validation Versus Least Squares Cross-Validation for Choosing the Smoothing Parameter in Kernel Home-Range Analysis , 2006 .

[20]  Stephen M. Krone,et al.  Analyzing animal movements using Brownian bridges. , 2007, Ecology.

[21]  John Fieberg,et al.  Kernel density estimators of home range: smoothing and the autocorrelation red herring. , 2007, Ecology.

[22]  Devin S Johnson,et al.  A General Framework for the Analysis of Animal Resource Selection from Telemetry Data , 2008, Biometrics.

[23]  Göran Ericsson,et al.  Screening Radiolocation Datasets for Movement Strategies With Time Series Segmentation , 2008 .

[24]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  Animal movements in heterogeneous landscapes: identifying profitable places and homogeneous movement bouts. , 2008, Ecology.

[25]  Edward A. Codling,et al.  Random walk models in biology , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[26]  J. Fryxell,et al.  Are there general mechanisms of animal home range behaviour? A review and prospects for future research. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[27]  Wayne M Getz,et al.  Methods for assessing movement path recursion with application to African buffalo in South Africa. , 2009, Ecology.

[28]  Trent L McDonald,et al.  Estimating habitat selection when GPS fix success is less than 100%. , 2009, Ecology.

[29]  Darcy R. Visscher,et al.  Memory keeps you at home: a mechanistic model for home range emergence , 2009 .

[30]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  Incorporating Movement Behavior and Barriers to Improve Kernel Home Range Space Use Estimates , 2010 .

[31]  Jason Matthiopoulos,et al.  The interpretation of habitat preference metrics under use–availability designs , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  Edward A Codling,et al.  Diffusion about the mean drift location in a biased random walk. , 2010, Ecology.

[33]  J. M. Fryxell,et al.  Foraging theory upscaled: the behavioural ecology of herbivore movement , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  Francesca Cagnacci,et al.  The home-range concept: are traditional estimators still relevant with modern telemetry technology? , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  Mark S Boyce,et al.  Correlation and studies of habitat selection: problem, red herring or opportunity? , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  Francesca Cagnacci,et al.  Resolving issues of imprecise and habitat-biased locations in ecological analyses using GPS telemetry data , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.