The self-regulation concept of motivation at work

In recent years there has been a growing interest in activity theory. The systemic–structural theory of activity is an outgrowth of the general activity theory, which has been employed to develop practical approaches and methods for the study of human work. The most important of these approaches are the morphological and functional analyses of activity. The basic concept within the morphological analysis is action. On the other hand, in the functional analysis of activity the functional mechanism or function block is the major concept. This functional analysis approaches activity as a self-regulating system. In this work we will use the functional analysis to study motivation. From the perspective of the functional analysis, motivation is not a unitary process, but rather consists of different stages, which may be either in agreement or in conflict with each other. Here we will attempt to demonstrate that contradictions between the different stages of motivation can be reduced to increase work motivation and productivity.

[1]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[2]  N. Wiener,et al.  Purposeful and Non-Purposeful Behavior , 1950, Philosophy of Science.

[3]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  The situational reflection of reality in activity theory and the concept of situation awareness in cognitive psychology , 2004 .

[4]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  The Principle of Unity of Cognition and Behavior: Implications of Activity Theory for the Study of Human Work , 2001 .

[5]  David Meister,et al.  Performance Measurement : Current Perspectives and Future Challenges , 2006 .

[6]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1997 .

[7]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  A functional model of the human orienting activity , 2004 .

[8]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. , 1982 .

[9]  G. Bedny,et al.  The Systemic-Structural Theory of Activity: Applications to the Study of Human Work , 2005 .

[10]  G. Bedny,et al.  Individual Features of Personality in the Former Soviet Union , 1999 .

[11]  James M. Nyce.  Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996, 400 pp. , 1997 .

[12]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Play, learning, and instruction , 1999 .

[13]  G. Bedny,et al.  Theory of Activity and Situation Awareness , 1999 .

[14]  O. Bertelsen,et al.  Activity Theory , 2003 .

[15]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Goal setting theory and job performance. , 1989 .

[16]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Through the Interface: A Human Activity Approach To User Interface Design , 1990 .

[17]  Gregory Z. Bedny,et al.  Individual style of activity and adaptation to standard performance requirements. , 1999 .

[18]  David Meister,et al.  Activity theory: History, research and application , 2000 .

[19]  J. Wertsch.  The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology , 1981 .

[20]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  A methodology for systemic‐structural analysis and design of manual‐based manufacturing operations , 2001 .

[21]  Per Capita,et al.  About the authors , 1995, Machine Vision and Applications.

[22]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .