Effects of heat and electricity saving measures in district-heated multistory residential buildings

The effects of heat and electricity saving measures in district-heated buildings can be complex because these depend not only on how energy is used on the demand side but also on how energy is provided from the supply side. In this study, we analyze the effects of heat and electricity saving measures in multistory concrete-framed and wood-framed versions of an existing district-heated building and examine the impacts of the reduced energy demand on different district heat (DH) production configurations. The energy saving measures considered are for domestic hot water reduction, building thermal envelope improvement, ventilation heat recovery (VHR), and household electricity savings. Our analysis is based on a measured heat load profile of an existing DH production system in Vaxjo, Sweden. Based on the measured heat load profile, we model three minimum-cost DH production system using plausible environmental and socio-political scenarios. Then, we investigate the primary energy implications of the energy saving measures applied to the two versions of the existing building, taking into account the changed DH demand, changed cogenerated electricity, and changed electricity use due to heat and electricity saving measures. Our results show that the difference between the final and primary energy savings of the concrete-framed and wood-framed versions of the case-study building is minor. The primary energy efficiency of the energy saving measures depends on the type of measure and on the composition of the DH production system. Of the various energy saving measures explored, electricity savings give the highest primary energy savings for the building versions. In contrast to the other heat savings measures, VHR gives lower primary energy savings as it also increases electricity demand. Primary energy savings for the building versions are lower where the minimum-cost DH production system includes cogeneration unit compared to where the minimum-cost DH production system comprises heat-only boilers. The primary energy savings are mainly from peak and medium-load boilers even though these production units cover a small share of the total DH production. This study shows that it is essential to consider the interaction between end-use energy saving measures and supply systems for district-heated buildings, to estimate the primary energy efficiency of energy saving measures.

[1]  Tomas Persson.  Combined solar and pellet heating systems for single-family houses : how to achieve decreased electricity usage, increased system efficiency and increased solar gains , 2006 .

[2]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Swedish biomass strategies to reduce CO2 emission and oil use in an EU context , 2012 .

[3]  Brian Vad Mathiesen,et al.  Energy system analysis of 100% renewable energy systems-The case of Denmark in years 2030 and 2050 , 2009 .

[4]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Cost and primary energy efficiency of small-scale district heating systems , 2014 .

[5]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Future production and utilisation of biomass in Sweden: potentials and CO2 mitigation , 1997 .

[6]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Effect of thermal mass on life cycle primary energy balances of a concrete- and a wood-frame building , 2012 .

[7]  Magnus Åberg,et al.  Optimisation of a Swedish district heating system with reduced heat demand due to energy efficiency measures in residential buildings , 2011 .

[8]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  District heating systems and energy conservation—part I , 1994 .

[9]  W. Gilijamse,et al.  Energy efficiency in new houses. Heat demand reduction versus cogeneration , 1995 .

[10]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Variability in energy and carbon dioxide balances of wood and concrete building materials , 2006 .

[11]  Louise Trygg,et al.  Energy conservation measures in buildings heated by district heating – A local energy system perspective , 2010 .

[12]  Moncef Krarti,et al.  Energy Audit of Building Systems : An Engineering Approach , 2000 .

[13]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Coproduction of district heat and electricity or biomotor fuels , 2011 .

[14]  Diana Ürge-Vorsatz,et al.  Drivers of market transformation: analysis of the Hungarian lighting success story , 2001 .

[15]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Integrated biomass-based production of district heat, electricity, motor fuels and pellets of different scales , 2013 .

[16]  W. Nordhaus.  The "Stern Review" on the Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[17]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Primary energy implications of end-use energy efficiency measures in district heated buildings , 2011 .

[18]  T. Hall,et al.  The Million Homes Programme: a review of the great Swedish planning project , 2005 .

[19]  Barbara Schlomann,et al.  Characterization of the household electricity consumption in the EU, potential energy savings and sp , 2011 .

[20]  Jonas Nässén.  Energy efficiency - Trends, determinants, trade-offs and rebound effects with examples from Swedish housing , 2007 .

[21]  Svend Svendsen,et al.  Energy-efficient houses built according to the energy performance requirements introduced in Denmark in 2006 , 2007 .

[22]  Bernd Möller,et al.  End-use energy savings and district heating expansion in a local renewable energy system: A short-term perspective , 2012 .

[23]  Hans Lind,et al.  Incentives for Improving Energy Efficiency When Renovating Large-Scale Housing Estates: A Case Study of the Swedish Million Homes Programme , 2009 .

[24]  Tomas Persson.  Dishwasher and washing machine heated by a hot water circulation loop , 2007 .