Computational generation of slogans

Abstract In advertising, slogans are used to enhance the recall of the advertised product by consumers and to distinguish it from others in the market. Creating effective slogans is a resource-consuming task for humans. In this paper, we describe a novel method for automatically generating slogans, given a target concept (e.g., car) and an adjectival property to express (e.g., elegant) as input. Additionally, a key component in our approach is a novel method for generating nominal metaphors, using a metaphor interpretation model, to allow generating metaphorical slogans. The method for generating slogans extracts skeletons from existing slogans. It then fills a skeleton in with suitable words by utilizing multiple linguistic resources (such as a repository of grammatical relations, and semantic and language models) and genetic algorithms to optimize multiple objectives such as semantic relatedness, language correctness, and usage of rhetorical devices. We evaluate the metaphor and slogan generation methods by running crowdsourced surveys. On a five-point Likert scale, we ask online judges to evaluate whether the generated metaphors, along with three other metaphors generated using different methods, highlight the intended property. The slogan generation method is evaluated by asking crowdsourced judges to rate generated slogans from five perspectives: (1) how well is the slogan related to the topic, (2) how correct is the language of the slogan, (3) how metaphoric is the slogan, (4) how catchy, attractive, and memorable is it, and (5) how good is the slogan overall. Similarly, we evaluate existing expert-made slogans. Based on the evaluations, we analyze the method and provide insights regarding existing slogans. The empirical results indicate that our metaphor generation method is capable of producing apt metaphors. Regarding the slogan generator, the results suggest that the method has successfully produced at least one effective slogan for every evaluated input.

[1]  I. Richards The Philosophy of Rhetoric , 1936 .

[2]  J. Reinsch An investigation of the effects of the metaphor and simile in persuasive discourse , 1971 .

[3]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Aptness in metaphor , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Richard J. Vondruska,et al.  Salience, similes, and the asymmetry of similarity , 1985 .

[5]  A. Katz On choosing the vehicles of metaphors: Referential concreteness, semantic distances, and individual differences , 1989 .

[6]  Beatrice Santorini,et al.  Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank , 1993, CL.

[7]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  The role of similarity in similes and metaphors , 1993 .

[8]  Hairong Li,et al.  What Makes a Slogan Memorable and Who Remembers It , 1994 .

[9]  Lynette Knowles Mathur,et al.  THE EFFECT OF ADVERTISING SLOGAN CHANGES ON THE MARKET VALUES OF FIRMS , 1995 .

[10]  Boris Kabanoff,et al.  Computer-aided content analysis: What do 240 advertising slogans have in common? , 1996 .

[11]  G. Tom The Use of Rhetorical Devices in Advertising , 1999 .

[12]  Pedro A. Fuertes-Olivera,et al.  Persuasion and advertising English: Metadiscourse in slogans and headlines , 2001 .

[13]  Gary Dahl,et al.  Advertising For Dummies , 2001 .

[14]  S. Glucksberg Understanding figurative language : from metaphors to idioms , 2001 .

[15]  Chiranjeev Kohli,et al.  Creating effective logos: Insights from theory and practice , 2002 .

[16]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[17]  R. Giora On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language , 2003 .

[18]  Kamran Baig An act of creation , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  Ning Yu On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language , 2005, Language in Society.

[20]  Stefan Evert,et al.  Corpora and collocations , 2007 .

[21]  Carlo Strapparava,et al.  Automatizing Two Creative Functions for Advertising , 2007 .

[22]  Silvia Bernardini,et al.  The WaCky wide web: a collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora , 2009, Lang. Resour. Evaluation.

[23]  Yair Neuman,et al.  Literal and Metaphorical Sense Identification through Concrete and Abstract Context , 2011, EMNLP.

[24]  Tony Veale,et al.  Specifying Viewpoint and Information Need with Affective Metaphors: A System Demonstration of the Metaphor-Magnet Web App/Service , 2012, ACL.

[25]  Hannu Toivonen,et al.  Corpus-Based Generation of Content and Form in Poetry , 2012, ICCC.

[26]  Walter Daelemans,et al.  Pattern for Python , 2012, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[27]  Anna Jordanous,et al.  A Standardised Procedure for Evaluating Creative Systems: Computational Creativity Evaluation Based on What it is to be Creative , 2012, Cognitive Computation.

[28]  Simon Mille,et al.  Perspective-oriented generation of football match summaries: Old tasks, new challenges , 2012, TSLP.

[29]  Simon Colton,et al.  Computational Creativity: The Final Frontier? , 2012, ECAI.

[30]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Componential Theory of Creativity , 2012 .

[31]  Marc Parizeau,et al.  DEAP: evolutionary algorithms made easy , 2012, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[32]  Josep Blat,et al.  Generating Apt Metaphor Ideas for Pictorial Advertisements , 2013, ICCC.

[33]  Gözde Özbal,et al.  BRAINSUP: Brainstorming Support for Creative Sentence Generation , 2013, ACL.

[34]  Masafumi Hagiwara,et al.  Tag line generating system using knowledge extracted from statistical analyses , 2013, AI & SOCIETY.

[35]  Tony Veale,et al.  Creating Similarity: Lateral Thinking for Vertical Similarity Judgments , 2013, ACL.

[36]  Martin Znidarsic,et al.  Implementation of a Slogan Generator , 2014, ICCC.

[37]  Martin Znidarsic,et al.  Using a Genetic Algorithm to Produce Slogans , 2015, Informatica.

[38]  Gözde Özbal,et al.  Slogans Are Not Forever: Adapting Linguistic Expressions to the News , 2015, IJCAI.

[39]  Hannu Toivonen,et al.  Computational generation and dissection of lexical replacement humor* , 2015, Natural Language Engineering.

[40]  Sarah Harmon,et al.  FIGURE8: A Novel System for Generating and Evaluating Figurative Language , 2015, ICCC.

[41]  Case-Based Slogan Production , 2015, ICCBR.

[42]  Matthew Purver,et al.  From Distributional Semantics to Conceptual Spaces: A Novel Computational Method for Concept Creation , 2015, J. Artif. Gen. Intell..

[43]  G. Steen,et al.  Making ads less complex, yet more creative and persuasive: the effects of conventional metaphors and irony in print advertising , 2015 .

[44]  Gözde Özbal,et al.  Automatic Creation of Flexible Catchy Headlines , 2016, IJCAI 2016.

[45]  Gözde Özbal,et al.  Heady-Lines: A Creative Generator Of Newspaper Headlines , 2016, IUI Companion.

[46]  Gonzalo Méndez,et al.  Exploring the Role of Word Associations in the Construction of Rhetorical Figures , 2016, ICCC.

[47]  Darryl W. Miller,et al.  An analysis of rhetorical figures and other linguistic devices in corporation brand slogans , 2016 .

[48]  Khalid Al-Najjar,et al.  Meta4meaning: Automatic Metaphor Interpretation Using Corpus-Derived Word Associations , 2016, ICCC.

[49]  Hannu Toivonen,et al.  Expanding and Weighting Stereotypical Properties of Human Characters for Linguistic Creativity , 2017, ICCC.

[50]  Hannu Toivonen,et al.  Data-Driven News Generation for Automated Journalism , 2017, INLG.

[51]  Martin Znidarsic,et al.  BISLON: BISociative SLOgaN generation based on stylistic literary devices , 2018, ICCC.

[52]  Mika Hämäläinen,et al.  A Master-Apprentice Approach to Automatic Creation of Culturally Satirical Movie Titles , 2018, INLG.

[53]  Hadaytullah Hadaytullah,et al.  "Talent, Skill and Support." A Method for Automatic Creation of Slogans , 2018, ICCC.

[54]  Yoshinobu Kano,et al.  Japanese Advertising Slogan Generator using Case Frame and Word Vector , 2018, INLG.

[55]  Khalid Alnajjar Computational Analysis and Generation of Slogans , 2019 .

[56]  Stuart Adam Battersby,et al.  Conceptual Representations for Computational Concept Creation , 2019, ACM Comput. Surv..

[57]  Hannu Toivonen,et al.  No Time Like the Present: Methods for Generating Colourful and Factual Multilingual News Headlines , 2019, ICCC.