Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in upgrading and refining of Canada's oil sands products

A model-FUNNEL-GHG-OS (FUNdamental ENgineering PrinciplEs- based ModeL for Estimation of GreenHouse Gases in the Oil Sands) based on fundamental engineering principles was developed to estimate the specific energy consumption and GHGs (greenhouse gas emissions) for upgrading bitumen to produce SCO (synthetic crude oil). The model estimates quantity of SCO produced, the consumption of hydrogen, steam, natural gas and power in two different upgrading operations, namely delayed coking and hydroconversion. Hydroconversion upgrading is more energy and GHG (433.4 kgCO2eq/m3 of bitumen) intensive than delayed coker upgrading (240.3 kgCO2eq/m3 of bitumen) but obtains a higher yield of SCO. This research explores bitumen pathways in oil sands – upgrading bitumen to SCO, followed by transporting and refining SCO as compared to transporting and refining dilbit. The energy consumption, GHG emissions and volume of transportation fuels obtained from refining of different oil sands feeds has been investigated. Refining of oil sands products produce 7.9 to 15.72 gCO2eq per MJ of refined product. Refining of SCO to transportation fuels produces 41% and 49% less emissions than dilbit and bitumen respectively.

[1]  Adam R. Brandt,et al.  Variability and uncertainty in life cycle assessment models for greenhouse gas emissions from Canadian oil sands production. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Jessica P. Abella,et al.  Model to investigate energy and greenhouse gas emissions implications of refining petroleum: impacts of crude quality and refinery configuration. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Q. H. Yin,et al.  Energy-use analysis and improvement for delayed coking units , 2004 .

[4]  Heather L. MacLean,et al.  Should Alberta upgrade oil sands bitumen? An integrated life cycle framework to evaluate energy systems investment tradeoffs , 2013 .

[5]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in the recovery and extraction of crude bitumen from Canada’s oil sands , 2015 .

[6]  G. Karras,et al.  Combustion emissions from refining lower quality oil: what is the global warming potential? , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Heather L. MacLean,et al.  Understanding the Canadian oil sands industry’s greenhouse gas emissions , 2009 .

[8]  Balwinder Nimana.  Life Cycle Assessment of Transportation Fuels from Canada’s Oil Sands through Development of Theoretical Engineering Models , 2014 .

[9]  Mahmudur Rahman,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from recovery of various North American conventional crudes , 2014 .

[10]  Heather L MacLean,et al.  Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of current oil sands technologies: GHOST model development and illustrative application. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Ali Elkamel,et al.  Modeling the energy demands and greenhouse gas emissions of the Canadian oil sands industry , 2007 .

[12]  Tyler Joseph Tarnoczi,et al.  Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions from transportation of Canadian oil sands to future markets , 2013 .

[13]  Pamela L. Spath,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrogen Production via Natural Gas Steam Reforming , 2000 .

[14]  Larry Bredeson,et al.  Factors driving refinery CO2 intensity, with allocation into products , 2010 .

[15]  Adam R. Brandt,et al.  Upstream greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from Canadian oil sands as a feedstock for European reneries , 2011 .

[16]  Joule A Bergerson,et al.  Life cycle Greenhouse gas emissions of current Oil Sands Technologies: surface mining and in situ applications. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Edward Furimsky.  Emissions of Carbon Dioxide from Tar Sands Plants in Canada , 2003 .

[18]  Babatunde Olateju,et al.  Hydrogen production from wind energy in Western Canada for upgrading bitumen from oil sands , 2011 .